SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & McClure, C. R. (2011). Public libraries and the Internet: Roles, perspectives, and implications. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
  • Chow, C., Ellis, J., Mark, J., & Wise, B. (1998). Impact of CTCNet Affiliates: Findings from a national survey of users of community technology centers. Newton, MA: Education Development Center, Inc. (http://www.ctcnetorg/impact98.html).
  • Cockburn, C. (1992). The circuit of technology. In R. Silverstone & E. Hirsch (Eds.), Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces. London: Routledge.
  • Colley, A., & Comber, C. (2003). Age and gender differences in computer use and attitudes among secondary school students: What has changed? Education Research, 45, 155165.
  • Cooper, J. (2006). The digital divide: The special case of gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 320334.
  • Cooper, J., & Weaver, K. D. (2003). Gender and computers: Understanding the digital divide. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
  • Correa, T. (2010). The participation divide among “online experts”: Experience, skills, and psychological factors as predictors of college students' web content creation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(1), 7192.
  • de Haan, J. (2004). A multifaceted dynamic model of the digital divide. IT & Society, 1(7), 6688.
  • Dutton, W. H. (2012, March). The social shaping of digital research. Paper presented at Social Science and Digital Research: Interdisciplinary Insights. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract = 2019877 or 10.2139/ssrn.2019877
  • Fallows, D. (2005). How men and women use the Internet. Pew Internet and American Life Project. April 30, 2012. http://www.pewInternet.org/Reports/2005/How-Women-and-Men-Use-the-Internet.aspx
  • Fidishun, D. (2007). Women and the public library: Using technology, using the library Library Trends, 56(2), 328343.
  • Fulk, J. (1993). “Social Construction of Communication Technology.” The Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 921950.
  • Giddens. A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
  • Gomez, R., Ambikar, R., & Coward, C. (2009). Libraries, telecentres and cybercafes: An international study of public access information venues. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 10(1), 3348.
  • Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's online skills [Electronic Version]. First Monday, 7. Retrieved October 10, 2008 from http://www.firstmonday.org/Issues/issue7_4/hargittai/.
  • Hargittai, E., & Shafer, S. (2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 432448.
  • Hargittai, E., & Steven, S. (2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 432448.
  • Hargittai, E., & Walejko, G. (2008). The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Communication & Society, 11(2), 239256.
  • Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1998). Bridging the racial divide on the Internet. Science, 280, 390391.
  • Howard, P. N., Rainie, L., & Jones, S. (2001). Days and nights on the Internet: The impact of diffusing technology. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 383404.
  • Huff, C., & Cooper, J. (1987). Sex bias in educational software: The effect of desgners' stereotypes on the software they design. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 519532.
  • Jerabek, J. A., Meyer, L. S., & Kordinak, S. T. (2001). “Library anxiety” And “computer anxiety”: Measures, validity, and research implications. Library & Information Science Research, 23(3), 277289.
  • Jiao, Q. G., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). The impact of information technology on library anxiety: The role of computer attitudes. Information Technology and Libraries, 23(4), 138144.
  • Katz, J., & Aspden, P. (1997). Motivations for and barriers to Internet usage: Results of a national public opinion survey. Internet research: Electronic networking applications and policy, 7(3).
  • Kramer, P. E., & Lehman, S. (1990). Mismeasuring women: A critique of research on computer ability and avoidance. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16(1), 158172.
  • LaRose, R., Gregg, J. L., Strover, S., Straubhaar, J., & Carpenter, S. (2007). Closing the rural broadband gap: Promoting adoption of the Internet in rural America. Telecommunications Policy, 31(6/7), 359373.
  • Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media and Society 9(4), 671696.
  • Losh, S., Carol. (2004). Gender, educational, and occupational digital gaps. Social Science Computer Review, 22(2), 152166.
  • Lunt, P., & Livingstone, S. (1996). Rethinking the focus group in media and communication research. Journal of Communication, 46(2), 7998.
  • Mackenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (1985). The social shaping of technology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  • Madden, M., & Rainie, L. (2003). America's online pursuits: The changing picture of who's online and what they do. Pew Internet & American Life Project.
  • Meraz, S. (2008). Women and technology: How socialization created a gender gap. In P. M. Poindexter, S. Meraz & A. Schmitz-Weiss (Eds.), Women, men and news: Divided and disconnected in the news media landscape (pp. 99116). New York: Routledge.
  • Moe, T. (2004). Bridging the “digital divide” In Colorado libraries: Survey results from the Colorado public libraries & the “Digital divide” 2002 study. Public Libraries, 1–10.
  • Newhagen, J. N., & Bucy, E. P. (2004). Routes to media access In J. N. Newhagen & E. P. Bucy (Eds.), Media access: Social and psychological dimensions of new technology use. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399441.
  • Pinkard, N. (2005). How the perceived masculinity and/or femininity of software applications influences students' software preferences Journal of educational Computing Research, 32, 5778.
  • Spence, J., Straubhaar, J., Machado, N., Correa, T., & Lee, K. (2010, June). Constructing a new information society in the tropics: Examining Brazilian approaches to information and communication technologies (ICTs) through the lens of the user and the non-user. Paper presented at the 60th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association conference.
  • Straubhaar, J.D. Tufekci, Z., Spence, J., & Lentz, R. eds. (forthcoming). The persistence of inequity in the Austin technopolis. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  • Terry, A., & Gomez, R. (2010). Gender and public access computing: An international perspective. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 43(5), 117.
  • van Dijk, J. (2005). The deepening divide inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • van Dijk, J. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34(4–5), 221235.
  • Wilson, K. R., Wallin, J. S., & Reiser, C. (2003). Social stratification and the digital divide. Social Science Computer Review, 21, 133143.