Comparison of Different Pacing Strategies to Minimize Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Authors


  • Funding for this work was provided by NIH Grant UL1TR00058 to VCU Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (L.R.T.).

  • Jose F. Huizar reports grant support from St. Jude Medical and Boston Scientific. Karoly Kaszala is an investigator for Boston Scientific, St. Jude Medical, and Sorin. Jayanthi N. Koneru received honoraria from Medtronic. Kenneth A. Ellenbogen received grant support and honoraria and is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Medtronic, St. Jude Medical, and Biotronik. Other authors: No disclosures.

Address for correspondence: Jose F. Huizar, M.D., McGuire VA Medical Center, 1201 Broad Rock Blvd. (Rm 4A-100), Richmond, VA 23249, USA. Fax: 804-675-5467; E-mails: jose.huizar2@va.gov; jfhuizar@gmail.com

Pacing Strategies to Minimize PN Stimulation

Introduction

Phrenic nerve (PN) stimulation (PNS) frequently limits cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Yet, pacing strategies to minimize PNS have not been systematically compared. We propose to: (1) compare different pacing strategies to minimize PNS in CRT and (2) evaluate differences between PN and left ventricular (LV) capture thresholds among LV pacing configurations.

Methods and Results

PN and LV thresholds were obtained using 6 LV configurations in 28 patients with any PNS during CRT implantation or replacement. Incidence of PNS was compared in all LV configurations by programming pacing output to (1) One Volt (V) above LV threshold, (2) triple pulse width (PW) at LV threshold, and (3) 1.5 times LV threshold for each patient. PN thresholds and PN strength-duration curves were statistically different between configurations (P < 0.05). Ring→RVcoil and Ring→Can had the largest difference between PN and LV thresholds. Pacing output programmed to 1.5 times LV threshold, 1 V above LV threshold, and triple PW at LV threshold had similar probability of PNS between LV configurations. However, 1 V above LV threshold and triple PW at LV threshold frequently resulted in poor (<30%) LV capture safety margin (14–43% and 53–68%, respectively). Freedom from PNS (programmed output at twice LV threshold) was found in 88%, 84%, and 52% with 6, 3, or 2 available LV configurations, respectively.

Conclusion

Multiple LV pacing configurations marginally increase the probability of avoiding PNS by electronic reprogramming. Pacing output programmed to 1.5 times LV threshold is an additional alternative to minimize PNS when electronic reprogramming options are limited.

Ancillary