Data deposited at Dryad: doi:10.5061/dryad.0fm71
From nature to the laboratory: the impact of founder effects on adaptation
Article first published online: 30 OCT 2012
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2012 European Society For Evolutionary Biology
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume 25, Issue 12, pages 2607–2622, December 2012
How to Cite
Santos, J., Pascual, M., Simões, P., Fragata, I., Lima, M., Kellen, B., Santos, M., Marques, A., Rose, M. R. and Matos, M. (2012), From nature to the laboratory: the impact of founder effects on adaptation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 25: 2607–2622. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12008
- Issue published online: 16 NOV 2012
- Article first published online: 30 OCT 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 4 SEP 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 31 AUG 2012
- Manuscript Received: 23 JUL 2012
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
- 1986. Genetic drift and the loss of alleles versus heterozygosity. Zoo Biology 5: 181–190.
- 2004. Effects of genetic drift on variance components under a general model of epistasis. Evolution 58: 2111–2132. &
- 1996. Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. Ser. B 263: 1619–1626. &
- 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol. 57: 289–300. &
- 2002. Likelihood-based estimation of the effective population size using temporal changes in allele frequencies: a genealogical approach. Genetics 160: 741–751. , , &
- 1986. THe effect of an experimental bottleneck upon quantitative genetic variation in the housefly. Genetics 114: 1191–1211. , &
- 2006. The change in quantitative genetic variation with inbreeding. Evolution 60: 2428–2434. &
- 1998. The effects of founding bottlenecks on genetic variation in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris) in North America. Heredity 80: 519–525.
- 2007. Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 621–631. &
- 1999. Epistasis and the evolution of additive genetic variance in populations that pass through a bottleneck. Evolution 53: 1009–1018. , , , , , et al.
- 1970. An Introduction to Population Genetic Theory. Harper & Row, New York. &
- 2008. Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol. Ecol. 17: 431–449. &
- 1962. Genetic drift and natural selection in experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 48: 148–156. &
- 2011. Comparisons between Q(ST) and F(ST) -how wrong have we been? Mol. Ecol. 20: 4830–4839. , &
- 2003. Effects of intense versus diffuse population bottlenecks on microsatellite genetic diversity and evolutionary potential. Conserv. Genet. 4: 595–604. , , , , &
- 2010. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Res. 10: 564–567. &
- 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow, England. &
- 1999. Quantitative genetics in conservation biology. Genet. Res. 74: 237–244.
- 2003. Dynamics of genetic adaptation to captivity. Conserv. Genet. 4: 189–197. &
- 2005. Comparative losses of quantitative and molecular genetic variation in finite populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 85: 47–55. , &
- 1993. Type I repressors of P element mobility. Genetics 135: 81–95. , , , , , et al.
- 1988. Epistasis and the effect of founder events on the additive genetic variance. Evolution 42: 441–454.
- 1995. FSTAT (Vers. 2.9.3.): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J. Hered. 86: 485–486.
- 2005. Clinal variation and laboratory adaptation in the rainforest species Drosophila birchii for stress resistance, wing size, wing shape and development time. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 213–222. , &
- 2000. Laboratory selection experiments using Drosophila: what do they really tell us? Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 32–36. &
- 1994. Does variance in reproductive success limit effective population sizes of marine organisms? In: Genetics and Evolution of Aquatic Organisms (A.R. Beaumont, ed.), pp. 122–134. Chapman & Hall, London.
- 1981. Estimation of effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Genet. Res. 38: 209–216.
- 2001. Rapid loss of stress resistance in Drosophila melanogaster under adaptation to laboratory culture. Evolution 55: 436–438. , , &
- 2003. A microsatellite variability screen for positive selection associated with the “Out of Africa“ habitat expansion of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 165: 1137–1148. , &
- 2008. History, chance and adaptation during biological invasion: separating stochastic phenotypic evolution from response to selection. Ecol. Lett. 11: 852–866. &
- 2011. Applications and implications of neutral versus non-neutral markers in Molecular Ecology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 12: 3966–3988. &
- 2012. Founder effects persist despite adaptive differentiation: a field experiment with lizards. Science 335: 1086–1089. , , , &
- 1992. Effects of population bottlenecks on genetic diversity as measured by allozyme electrophoresis. Evolution 46: 477–494.
- 1985. Population bottlenecks and nonequilibrium models in population genetics. II. Number of alleles in a small population that was formed by a recent bottleneck. Genetics 111: 675–689. &
- 2001. Adaptation to the laboratory: comments on Sgrò and Partridge. Am Nat 158: 655–656. &
- 2000. An evolutionary no man's land. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 206. , , , &
- 2002. Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 285–291. &
- 1999. Genetic architecture of fitness and nonfitness traits: empirical patterns and development of ideas. Heredity 83: 103–109. &
- 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583–590.
- 1975. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29: 1–10. , &
- 2001. The Signed Mantel test to cope with autocorrelation in comparative analyses. J Appl Stat 28: 725–736. &
- 2007. The genetic effective and adult census size of an Australian population of tiger prawns (Penaeus esculentus). Mol. Ecol. 16: 127–138. , , , , , et al.
- 2003. Latitudinal divergence of common frog (Rana temporaria) life history traits by natural selection: evidence from a comparison of molecular and quantitative genetic data. Mol. Ecol. 12: 1963–1978. , , , , &
- 2000. High density of long dinucleotide microsatellites in Drosophila subobscura. Mol. Biol. 17: 1259–1267. , &
- 2006. Genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6: 288–295. &
- 2001. How closely correlated are molecular and quantitative measures of genetic variation? A meta-analysis Evolution 55: 1095–1103. &
- 2003. Correlation between Fitness and Genetic Diversity. Conserv. Biol. 17: 230–237. &
- 2003. A direct experimental test of founder-flush effects on the evolutionary potential for assortative mating. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 302–312. , &
- 1960. A theory of limits in artificial selection. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. Ser. B 153: 234–249.
- 2005. The effects of evolution are local: evidence from experimental evolution in Drosophila. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45: 486–491. , , , , , et al.
- 2008. GENEPOP'007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8: 103–106.
- 2007. Inferring local adaptation from QST-FST comparisons: neutral genetic and quantitative trait variation in European populations of great snipe. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 1563–1576. , , , , , et al.
- 2010. FISH mapping of microsatellite loci from Drosophila subobscura and its comparison to related species. Chromosome Res. 18: 213–226. , , &
- 2000. Evolutionary responses of the life history of wild-caught Drosophila melanogaster to two standard methods of laboratory culture. Am Nat 156: 341–353. &
- 2007. Evolutionary domestication in Drosophila subobscura. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 758–766. , , , &
- 2008a. Evolutionary dynamics of molecular markers during local adaptation: a case study in Drosophila subobscura. BMC Evol. Biol. 8: 66. , , , &
- 2008b. How repeatable is adaptive evolution? The role of geographical origin and founder effects in laboratory adaptation. Evolution 62: 1817–1829. , , , , &
- 2009. Experimental evolutionary domestication. In: Experimental Evolution: Concepts, Methods, and Applications of Selection Experiments (T. Garland, Jr. & M.R. Rose, eds), pp. 89–110. Regents of the University of California, California. , &
- 2010. Divergent evolution of molecular markers during laboratory adaptation in Drosophila subobscura. Genetica 138: 999–1009. , , &
- 2000. Experimental evaluation of the usefulness of microsatellite DNA for detecting demographic bottlenecks. Mol. Ecol. 9: 1517–1528. , &
- 2004. Comparative evaluation of a new effective population size estimator based on approximate bayesian computation. Genetics 167: 977–988. , &
- 1980. The theory of speciation via the founder principle. Genetics 94: 1011–1038.
- 1998. Separating the wheat from the chaff: patterns of genetic differentiation in high gene flow species. J. Hered. 89: 438–450.
- 1990. Selection on wing allometry in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 126: 975–989.
- 1990. Increased selection response in larger populations. II. Selection for ethanol vapor resistance in Drosophila melanogaster at two population sizes. Genetics 125: 585–597. &
- 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358–1370. &
- 1993. Gene interaction affects the additive genetic variance in subdivided populations with migration and extinction. Evolution 47: 1758–1769. , &
- 2006. Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37: 433–458. , &
- 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97–159.
- 1977. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations: Experimental Results and Evolutionary Deductions. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.