SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
jeb12011-sup-0001-FigS1-S5.docWord document240K

Figure S1 Values of the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) for different models of morphological clusters derived from a mclust analysis of PC scores derived from gill raker counts and eight landmark based morphmetric distances for pygmy whitefish (Prosopium coulterii) sampled from Chignik Lake, Alaska.

Figure S2 Plots of (a) δ15N and (b) δ13C vs. score along principal component 1 derived from landmark distance and gill raker counts in pygmy whitefish (Prosopium coulterii) collected from Chignik Lake, Alaska

Figure S3 Neighbor-Joining tree of inferred relationships among ATPase VI haplotypes sampled from pygmy whitefish (Prosopium coulterii) from Chignik and Black lakes, southwestern Alaska.

Figure S4 Distribution of ATPase VI sequence haplotypes among samples of pygmy whitefish (Prosopium coulterii) sampled from Chignik and Black lakes, southwestern Alaska.

Figure S5 Plot of scores for individual pygmy whitefish (Prosopium coulterii) sampled from Chignik and Black lakes, southwestern Alaska, in factorial correspondence space based on variation across nine microsatellite DNA loci.

jeb12011-sup-0002-TableS1-S2.docWord document58K

Table S1 Microsatellite DNA variation within samples of pygmy whitefish (Prosopium coulterii) sampled from Chignik and Black lakes, southwestern Alaska.

Table S2 Alignment of 512 bp of mitochondial DNA ATPase subunit VI in pygmy whitefish (Prosopium coulterii = H1–H31) and mountain whitefish (P. williamsoni).

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.