Data deposited at Dryad: doi: 10.5061/dryad.td18m
Curves as traits: genetic and environmental variation in mate preference functions
Version of Record online: 17 DEC 2012
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2012 European Society For Evolutionary Biology
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume 26, Issue 2, pages 434–442, February 2013
How to Cite
Rodríguez, R. L., Hallett, A. C., Kilmer, J. T. and Fowler-Finn, K. D. (2013), Curves as traits: genetic and environmental variation in mate preference functions. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 26: 434–442. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12061
- Issue online: 17 JAN 2013
- Version of Record online: 17 DEC 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 25 OCT 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 10 OCT 2012
- Manuscript Received: 1 AUG 2012
- NSF. Grant Numbers: IOS–1120790, IOS–0919962
- UWM SURF
- 1994 Sexual Selection. Princeton, Princeton, NJ.
- 2006. Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21: 296–302. &
- 2006. A comparison of methods to estimate cross–environmental genetic correlations. J. Evol. Biol. 19: 114–122. , &
- 2008. Love will tear you apart: different components of female choice exert contrasting selection pressures on male field crickets. Behav. Ecol. 19: 960–966.
- 2008. Acoustic experience shapes female mate choice in field crickets. Proc. Biol. Sci. 275: 2645–2650. &
- 1999. The study of intersexual selection using quantitative genetics. Behaviour 136: 1237–1266.
- 1995. The genetic basis of female mate preferences. J. Evol. Biol. 8: 129–171. &
- 2001. Female guppies agree to differ: phenotypic and genetic variation in mate–choice behavior and the consequences for sexual selection. Evolution 55: 1644–1655. &
- 2008. Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progess. Genetica 134: 69–78. , , , &
- 2008. Adaptive plasticity in female mate choice dampens sexual selection on male ornaments in the lark bunting. Science 319: 459–462. &
- 2006. Dissecting the complex genetic basis of mate choice. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7: 681–692. &
- 2010. The genetic basis of sexually selected variation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 41: 81–101. &
- 2012. The role of power versus energy in courtship: what is the ‘energetic cost’ of a courtship display? Anim. Behav. 84: 269–277.
- 2008. Host shifts, the evolution of communication, and speciation in the Enchenopa binotata species complex of treehoppers. In: Specialization, Speciation, and Radiation: The Evolutionary Biology of Herbivorous Insects (K. Tilmon, ed.), pp. 88–100. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. , &
- 2010. Host shifts and signal divergence: mating signals covary with host use in a complex of specialized plant-feeding insects. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 99: 60–72. , &
- 2004 Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA. &
- 2011. A unified approahc to the evolutionary consequences of genetic and nongenetic inheritance. Am. Nat. 178: E18–E36. &
- 2010. Quantitative genetics of female mate preferences in an ancestral and a novel environment. Evolution 64: 2758–2766. , &
- 1958 The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. A Complete Variorum Edition. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
- 2012a. Experience-mediated plasticity in mate preferences: mating assurance in a variable environment. Evolution 66: 459–468. &
- 2012b. The evolution of experience-mediated plasticity in mate preferences. J. Evol. Biol. 25: 1855–1863. &
- 1999. Quantitative genetics of sexual selection in the field cricket, Gryllus integer. Evolution 53: 848–854. &
- 2004. Genotype-environment interaction and the reliability of mating signals. Anim. Behav. 68: 1461–1468. &
- 2009. Establishing the identity of existing names in the North American Enchenopa binotata species complex of treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae). Entomol. News 120: 554–565. &
- 2009. Environmental heterogeneity, genotype-by-environment interactions and the reliability of sexual traits as indicators of mate quality. Proc. Biol. Sci. 276: 1153–1159. &
- 2011. Condition-dependent traits as signals of the functionality of vital cellular processes. Ecol. Lett. 14: 625–634.
- 1994. Vibrational signals associated with mating behavior in the treehopper Enchenopa binotata Say (Hemiptera: Homoptera: Membracidae). J. NY Entomol. Soc. 102: 266–270.
- 2010. The role of genotype-by-environment interactions in sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol. 23: 2031–2045. , &
- 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. 72: 283–327. &
- 2008. Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox. Genetica 132: 209–216. &
- 2006. Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37: 43–66. , &
- 2007. Mate choice evolution, dominance effects, and the maintenance of genetic variation. J. Theor. Biol. 244: 282–295. , &
- 1998 Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA. &
- 2008. Genetic analysis of female preference functions as function–valued traits. Am. Nat. 172: 194–202. , &
- 2004. Quantitative genetics models of sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 264–271. &
- 2005. Up hill, down dale: quantitative genetics of curvaceous traits. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 360: 1443–1455. &
- 2004. A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behav. Ecol. 15: 1044–1045.
- 2007. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol. Rev. 82: 591–605. &
- 2010. Genotype-by-environment interactions for female preference. J. Evol. Biol. 23: 2550–2557. , , &
- 2010. The Lande–Kirkpatrick mechanism is the null model of evolution by intersexual selection: implications for meaning, honesty, and design in intersexual signals. Evolution 64: 3085–3100.
- 2001. Context-dependent genetic benefits from mate choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 5–7.
- R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.
- 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223–225.
- 1996. The shape of female mating preferences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93: 14628–14631.
- 2000. The inheritance of female preference functions in a mate recognition system. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 327–332.
- 2007. Sexual selection and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38: 79–102.
- 1998. The genetics of sexual isolation. In: Endless Forms. Species and Speciation (D.J. Howard & S.H. Berlocher, eds), pp. 291–308. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. &
- 2005. Variation, but no covariance, in female preference functions and male song in a natural population of Drosophila montana. Anim. Behav. 70: 849–854. , &
- 2012. Grain of environment explains variation in strength of genotype × environment interaction. J. Evol. Biol. 25: 1897–1901.
- 2006. Divergence in female duetting signals in the Enchenopa binotata species complex of treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae). Ethology 112: 1231–1238. &
- 2004. Vibrational communication and reproductive isolation in the Enchenopa binotata species complex of treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae). Evolution 58: 571–578. , &
- 2006. Evidence that female preferences have shaped male signal evolution in a clade of specialized plant-feedings insects. Proc. Biol. Sci. 273: 2585–2593. , &
- 2008. Host shifts and the beginning of signal divergence. Evolution 62: 12–20. , , &
- 2012. Males adjust signalling effort based on female mate preference cues. Behav. Ecol. 23: 1218–1225. , , &
- 1997 Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY.
- 2010. Heritability of and early environment effects on variation in mating preferences. Evolution 64: 998–1006. , &
- 1988. Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42: 849–861.
- Function-valued Traits Working Group & 2012. Genetics and evolution of function-valued traits: understanding environmentally responsive phenotypes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27: 637–647. ,
- 2010. The importance of female choice, male–male competition, and signal transmission as causes of selection on male mating signals. Evolution 64: 3158–3171. &
- 2012. The impact of learning on sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27: 511–519. , , , , &
- 1985. Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39: 505–522. &
- 1983. Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58: 155–183.
- 2003 Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
- 2005. Developmental plasticity and the origin of species differences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102: 6543–6549.
- 2010. Multiple genetic linkages between female preference and male signal in rapidly speciating Hawaiian crickets. Evolution 64: 2238–2245. &
- 1993 Speciation of the Enchenopa binotata complex (Insecta: Homoptera: Membracidae). In: Evolutionary Patterns and Processes (D.R. Lees, D. Edwards, eds), pp. 299–317. Academic Press, New York, NY.
- 2008. Reaction norm variants for male calling song in populations of Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): toward a resolution of the lek paradox. Evolution 62: 1317–1334. , , , , &