SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
jeb12073-sup-0001-FigureS1.TIFimage/TIF2468KFigure S1 Comparisons of the Sex × Region interactions for CHCs from the population survey (top three panels) in Etges & Ahrens (2001) and in the present study (bottom three panels).
jeb12073-sup-0002-TableS1.docxWord document51KTable S1 Best discriminating CHCs for mated vs. unmated males and females from the ‘choice’ treatment in both generations, all P < 0.05.
jeb12073-sup-0003-TableS2.docxWord document72KTable S2 manova results for CHC variation in unmated males and females from the ‘choice’ treatment over two generations (n = 116).
jeb12073-sup-0004-TableS3.docxWord document108KTable S3 Correlations of CHC amounts with the first canonical variate in the ‘choice’ and ‘no choice’ trials for males only.
jeb12073-sup-0005-TableS4.docxWord document96KTable S4 Correlations of CHC amounts with the first canonical variate in the ‘choice’ and ‘no choice’ trials for females only.

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.