Sexual selection on brain size in shorebirds (Charadriiformes)
Article first published online: 13 MAR 2013
© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2013 European Society For Evolutionary Biology
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume 26, Issue 4, pages 878–888, April 2013
How to Cite
García-Peña, G. E., Sol, D., Iwaniuk, A. N. and Székely, T. (2013), Sexual selection on brain size in shorebirds (Charadriiformes). Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 26: 878–888. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12104
- Issue published online: 9 APR 2013
- Article first published online: 13 MAR 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 10 DEC 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 21 OCT 2012
- Manuscript Received: 23 JUL 2012
- Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología. Grant Number: 121695-161552
- Proyecto de Investigación. Grant Number: CGL2010-1838
- Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia
- Smithsonian Office. Grant Number: NE/C004167/1
Appendix S1 Units and references.
Appendix S2 Best candidate models on the relationship between ln male brain size (response) and predictors: ln male body mass, male polygamy scores, parental care (scores of male care and female care), offspring development and ecological effects (see 'Materials and methods').
Appendix S3 Best candidate models on the relationship between ln female brain size (response) and predictors: female polygamy scores, parental care (scores of male care and female care), offspring development and ecological effects (see 'Materials and methods').
Appendix S4 Contingency table on mating system and parental care system.
Appendix S5 MCMCglmm. Model structure and priors.
Appendix S6 Diagnostics of MCMCglmm.
Appendix S7 Online file, readable in R, with 1000 reconstructions of the most likely transitions in mating systems during the evolutionary history of shorebirds.
Appendix S8 Evolutionary rates of scaled measurements of brain and body sizes in shorebird mating systems.
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.