SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ahuja, A. & Singh, R.S. 2008. Variation and evolution of male sex combs in Drosophila: nature of selection response and theories of genetic variation for sexual traits. Genetics 179: 503509.
  • Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Bacigalupe, L., Crudgington, H.S., Slate, J., Moore, A.J. & Snook, R.R. 2008. Sexual selection and interacting phenotypes in experimental evolution: a study of Drosophila pseudoobscura mating behaviour. Evolution 62: 18041812.
  • Barmina, O. & Kopp, A. 2007. Sex-specific expression of a HOX gene associated with rapid morphological evolution. Dev. Biol. 311: 277286.
  • Bass, T.M., Grandison, R.C., Wong, R., Martinez, P., Partridge, L. & Piper, M.D.W. 2007. Optimization of dietary restriction protocols in Drosophila. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 62: 10711081.
  • Butlin, R.K. 1995a. Genetic variation in mating signals and responses. In: Speciation and the Recognition Concept (M.D. Lambert & G.H. Spencer, eds), pp. 327366. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Butlin, R.K. 1995b. Reinforcement: an idea evolving. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 432434.
  • Cook, R.M. 1977. Behavioral role of the sexcombs in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Behav. Genet. 7: 349357.
  • Coyne, J.A. 1985. Genetic studies of three sibling species of Drosophila with relationship to theories of speciation. Genet. Res. 46: 169192.
  • Crudgington, H.S., Beckerman, A.P., Brüstle, L., Green, K. & Snook, R.R. 2005. Experimental removal and elevation of sexual selection: does sexual selection generate manipulative males and resistant females? Am. Nat. 165: S72S87.
  • Crudgington, H.S., Fellows, S., Badcock, N.S. & Snook, R.R. 2009. Experimental manipulation of sexual selection promotes greater mating capacity but does not alter sperm investment. Evolution 63: 926938.
  • Crudgington, H.S., Fellows, S. & Snook, R.R. 2010. Increased opportunity for sexual conflict promotes harmful males with elevated courtship frequencies. J. Evol. Biol. 23: 440446.
  • Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray, London.
  • Endler, J.A. 1986. Natural Selection in the Wild, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Holland, B. & Rice, W.R. 1998. Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction vs. resistance. Evolution 52: 17.
  • Howard, D.J. 1993. Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. In: Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process (R. Harrison, ed.), pp. 4669. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Kaufman, T.C., Lewis, R. & Wakimoto, B. 1980. Genetic analysis of chromosome 3 in Drosophila melanogaster: the homeotic gene complex in polytene chromosome interval 84A-B. Genetics 94: 115133.
  • Kopp, A. & True, J.R. 2002. Evolution of male sexual characters in the oriental Drosophila melanogaster species group. Evol. Dev. 4: 278291.
  • Lachaise, D. & Chassagnard, M.T. 2002. Divergence of sex comb phenotypes in the Drosophila fima species group and radiation on Afrotropical Ficus, including five new species from east Africa and Madagascar (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Annales de la Société entomologique de France 38: 7999.
  • Lakovaara, S. & Saura, A. 1982. Evolution and speciation in the Drosophila obscura group. In: The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, vol. 3b (M. Ashburner, H.L. Carson & J.N. Thompson Jr, eds), pp 159. Academic Press, London.
  • Lemeunier, F., David, J., Tsacas, L. & Ashburner, M. 1986. The melanogaster species group. In: The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, vol. 3e (M. Ashburner, H.L. Carson & J.N. Thompson Jr, eds), pp. 147256. Academic Press, London.
  • Lewis, R.A., Kaufman, T.C., Denell, R.E. & Tallerico, P. 1980. Genetic analysis of the Antennapedia gene complex (ANT-C) and adjacent chromosomal regions of Drosophila melanogaster I. Polytene chromosome segments 84B–D. Genetics 95: 367381.
  • Markow, T.A., Bustoz, D & Pitnick, S. 1996. Sexual selection and a secondary sexual character in two Drosophila species. Anim. Behav. 52: 759766.
  • Martin, P.R., Montgomerie, R. & Lougheed, S.C. 2010. Rapid sympatry explains greater color pattern divergence in high latitude birds. Evolution 64: 336347.
  • McClintock, W.J. & Uetz, G.W. 1996. Female choice and pre-existing bias: visual cues during courtship in two Schizocosa wolf spiders (Araaneae: Lycosidae). Anim. Behav. 52: 167181.
  • McPeek, M.A., Symes, L.B., Zong, D.M. & McPeek, C.L. 2010. Species recognition and patterns of population variation in the reproductive structures of a damselfly genus. Evolution 65: 419428.
  • Mendelson, T.C. & Shaw, K.L. 2012. The (mis)concept of species recognition. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27: 421427.
  • Moore, A.J. & Pizzari, T. 2005. Quantitative genetic models of sexual conflict based on interacting phenotypes. Am. Nat. 165: S88S97.
  • Ng, C.S. & Kopp, A. 2008. Sex combs are important for male mating success in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Genet. 38: 195201.
  • Parker, G.A. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual con?ict. In: Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (M. S. Blum & N. A. Blum, eds), pp. 123166. Academic Press, New York.
  • Pattatucci, A.M., Otteson, D.C. & Kaufman, T.C. 1991. A functional and structural analysis of the sex combs reduced locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 129: 423441.
  • Pfennig, K.S. 1998. The evolution of mate choice and the potential for conflict between species and mate-quality recognition. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 265: 17431748.
  • Pfennig, K.S. 2000. Female spadefoot toads compromise on mate quality to ensure conspecific matings. Behav. Ecol. 11: 220227.
  • Pfennig, K.S. & Pfennig, D.W. 2009. Character displacement: ecological and reproductive responses to a common evolutionary problem. Q. Rev. Biol. 84: 253276.
  • Pfenning, K.S. & Hurlbert, A.H. 2012. Heterospecific interactions and the proliferation of sexually dimorphic traits. Curr. Zool. 58: 453462.
  • Polak, M. & Simmons, L.W. 2009. Secondary sexual trait size reveals competitive fertilization success in Drosophila bipectinata Duda. Behav. Ecol. 20: 753760.
  • Polak, M. & Starmer, W.T 2005. Environmental origins of sexually selected variation and a critique of the fluctuating asymmetry-sexual selection hypothesis. Evolution 59: 577585.
  • Polak, M. & Tomkins, J.L. 2012. Developmental instability as phenodeviance in a secondary sexual trait increases with fitness-damaging thermal stress. J. Evol. Biol. 25: 277287.
  • Polak, M., Starmer, W.T. & Wolf, L.L. 2004. Sexual selection for size and symmetry in a diversifying secondary sexual character in Drosophila bipectinata Duda (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Evolution 58: 597607.
  • Reuter, M., Linklater, J.R., Lehmann, L., Fowler, K., Chapman, T. & Hurst, G.D.D. 2008. Adaptation to experimental alterations of the operational sex ratio in populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 62: 401412.
  • Rice, W.R. & Holland, B. 1997. The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE) and the intraspecific red queen. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41: 110.
  • Robertson, F.W. 1962. Changing the relative size of the body parts of Drosophila by selection. Genet. Res. 3: 169180.
  • Robinson, S.P., Kennington, W.J. & Simmons, L.W. 2012. Assortative mating for relatedness in a large naturally occurring population of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 25: 716725.
  • Ryan, M.J. & Rand, A.S. 1993. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47: 647657.
  • Servedio, M.R. & Noor, M.A.F. 2003. The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34: 339364.
  • Snook, R.R., Robertson, A., Crudgington, H.S. & Ritchie, M.G. 2005. Experimental manipulation of sexual selection and the evolution of courtship song in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Behav. Genet. 35: 245255.
  • Snook, R.R., Brüstle, L. & Slate, J. 2009. A test and review of the role of effective population size on experimental sexual selection patterns. Evolution 63: 19231933.
  • Snook, R.R., Bacigalupe, L.D. & Moore, A.J. 2010. The quantitative genetics and coevolution of male and female reproductive traits. Evolution 64: 19261934.
  • Spieth, H.T. 1952. Mating behavior within the genus Drosophila (Diptera). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 99: 395474.
  • Struhl, G. 1982. Genes controlling segmental specification in the Drosophila thorax. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79: 73807384.
  • Tanaka, K, Barmina, O. & Kopp, A. 2009. Distinct developmental mechanisms underlie the evolutionary diversification of Drosophila sex combs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106: 47644769.
  • Wagner, A. 2011. Genotype networks shed light on evolutionary constraints. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26: 577584.
  • Wigby, S. & Chapman, T. 2004. Female resistance to male harm evolves in response to manipulation of sexual selection. Evolution 58: 10281037.
  • Wigby, S., Sirot, L.K., Linklater, J.R., Lehmann, L., Buehner, N., Calboli, F.C. et al. 2009. Seminal fluid protein allocation and male reproductive success. Curr. Biol. 19: 751757.