Polyandrous females acquire indirect benefits in a nuptial feeding species
Article first published online: 3 MAY 2013
© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2013 European Society For Evolutionary Biology
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume 26, Issue 6, pages 1307–1316, June 2013
How to Cite
Tuni, C., Albo, M. J. and Bilde, T. (2013), Polyandrous females acquire indirect benefits in a nuptial feeding species. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 26: 1307–1316. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12137
- Issue published online: 10 JUN 2013
- Article first published online: 3 MAY 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 16 JAN 2013
- Manuscript Received: 10 AUG 2012
- 1999. Positive selection drives the evolution of the Acp29AB accessory gland protein in Drosophila. Genetics 152: 543–551.
- 2011. Worthless donations: male deception and female counter play a gift-giving spider. BMC Evol. Biol. 11: 329. , , , &
- 2008. Why do males of the spider Pisaura mirabilis wrap their nuptial gifts in silk: Female preference or male control? Ethology 114: 775–781. , , &
- 2005. The evolution of infidelity in social monogamous passerines: the strength of direct and indirect selection on extrapair copulation in females. Am. Nat. 165: S26–S37. &
- 2000. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim. Behav. 60: 145–164. &
- 2005. Sexual Conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. &
- 1986. Female reproductive variation in a nuptial-feeding spider, Pisaura mirabilis. Bull. Brit. Arach. Soc. 7: 48–52. &
- 2006. Death feigning in the face of sexual cannibalism. Biol. Letters 2: 23–25. , , , &
- 2007a. Inbreeding avoidance in spiders: evidence for rescue effect in fecundity of female spiders with outbreeding opportunity. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 1237–1242. , &
- 2007b. Nuptial gifts of male spiders: sensory exploitation of the female's maternal care instinct or foraging motivation? Anim. Behav. 73: 267–273. , , , &
- 2008. The genetic architecture of fitness in a seed beetle: assessing the potential for indirect genetic benefits of female choice. BMC Evol. Biol. 8: 295. , , , &
- 1990. A general model of the role of male-donated nutrients in female insects' reproduction. Am. Nat. 136: 598–617.
- 2009. Promiscuous females avoid inbreeding by controlling sperm storage. Mol. Ecol. 18: 3340–3345. , &
- 1958. The World of Spiders. Collins, London.
- 2001. Seminal fluid-mediated fitness traits in Drosophila. Heredity 87: 511–521.
- 2006. Evolutionary conflicts of interests between males and females. Curr. Biol. 16: R744–R754.
- 1995. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373: 241–244. , , , &
- 1982. Ejaculate cost and male choice. Am. Nat. 119: 601–610.
- 1999. Sperm competition in a nuptial feeding spider, Pisaura mirabilis. Behaviour 136: 877–897. &
- 2000. Copulating with Multiple Mates Enhances Female Fecundity but not Egg-to-Adult Survival in the Bruchid Beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Evolution 54: 2161–2165. , &
- 1996. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
- 2006. Females benefit from mating with different males in the scorpionfly Panorpa cognata. Behav. Ecol. 17: 435–440.
- 2002. Material and genetic benefits of female multiple mating and polyandry. Anim. Behav. 64: 361–367. &
- 2006. Post-mating sexual selection increases lifetime fitness of polyandrous females in the wild. Nature 444: 89–92. , , , &
- 2009. Diet affects female mating behaviour in a seed-feeding beetle. Physiol. Entomol. 34: 370–378. &
- 2005. The evolution of polyandry: intrinsic sire effects contribute to embryo viability. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 1097–1103. &
- 2003. Male Accessory Gland Secretions: Modulators of Female Reproductive Physiology and Behavior. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 48: 163–184.
- 2008. Sexual Conflict over Nuptial Gifts in Insects. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 53: 83–101.
- 1999. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses inter-sexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96: 5083–5088. &
- 2003. Benefits of polyandry: a life history perspective. Evol. Biol. 33: 173–194. &
- 2002. Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 97–104. &
- 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. 75: 21–64. &
- 2011. Sexual selection and sperm quantity: meta-analyses of strategic ejaculation. Biol. Rev. 86: 863–884. &
- 1997. The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94: 1282–1286. &
- 2004. Sexually transmitted diseases of insects: distribution, evolution, ecology and host behaviour. Biol. Rev. 79: 557–581. &
- 1996. Silk investment in gifts by males of the nuptial feeding spider Pisaura mirabilis (Araneae: Pisauridae). Behaviour 133: 697–716.
- 2000. Does a single meal affect female reproductive output in the sexually cannibalistic praying mantid Iris oratoria? Ecol. Entomol. 25: 54–62.
- 1999. Genetic benefits enhance the reproductive success of polyandrous females. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96: 10236–10241. , &
- 1988. “Brautgeschenk” und Umspinnen der Beute bei Pisaura mirabilis, Dolomedes fimbriatus und Thaumasia uncata (Arachnida, Araneida, Pisauridae). Verhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins Hamburg 30: 353–393.
- 1989. Nuptial feeding in insects: theoretical models of male and female interests. Ethology 82: 3–26. &
- 2008. Neither mating rate nor spermatophore feeding influences longevity in a ladybird beetle. Ethology 114: 504–511. &
- 2003. Sophisticated sperm allocation in male fowl. Nature 426: 70–74. , , , &
- 2009. Female feeding regime and polyandry in the nuptially feeding nursery web spider, Pisaura mirabilis. Naturwissenschaften 96: 259–265. &
- 1988. Mating frequency and fecundity in insects. Biol. Rev. 63: 509–549.
- 1997. Does high mortality explain semelparity in the spider Stegodyphus lineatus (Eresidae)? Oikos 79: 92–100. &
- 2001. Sperm Competition and its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
- 2005. The evolution of polyandry: sperm competition, sperm selection, and offspring viability. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36: 125–146.
- 1989. Nuptial feeding in insects: mating effort versus paternal investment. Ethology 81: 332–343. &
- 2006. Postcopulatory inbreeding avoidance by female crickets only revealed by molecular markers. Mol. Ecol. 15: 3817–3824. , , &
- 2010. Insect seminal fluid proteins: identification and function. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 56: 21–40. , , &
- 2001. Nuptial gift in the spider Pisaura mirabilis maintained by sexual selection. Behav. Ecol. 12: 691–697.
- 1983. The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. &
- 1998. Benefits of multiple mates in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Evolution 52: 1726–1730. &
- 2000. Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage. Mol. Ecol. 9: 1013–1027. &
- 2002. Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature 415: 71–73. &
- 2010. No preference for novel mating partners in the polyandrous nuptial-feeding spider Pisaura mirabilis (Araneae: Pisauridae). Anim. Behav. 80: 435–442. &
- 1998. The function of nuptial feeding in insects: review of empirical studies. Ethology 113: 105–127.
- 2003. Increases in egg production in multiply mated female bushcrickets Leptophyes punctatissima are not due to substances in the nuptial gift. Ecol. Entomol. 28: 124–128.
- 1997. No effect of nuptial gift consumption on female reproductive output in the bushcricket Leptophyes laticauda Friv. Ecol. Entomol. 22: 479–482. &
- 1991. Multiple paternity as genetic bet-hedging in female sierra dome spiders, Linyphia litigiosa (Linyphiidae). Anim. Behav. 41: 343–360.
- 1989. The wartbiter spermatophore and its effect on female reproductive output (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae, Decticus verrucivorus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24: 117–125. &
- 2002. Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm limited females. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 313–320. , &
- 1986. Variation and genomic localization of genes encoding Drosophila melanogaster male accessory gland proteins separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Genetics 114: 77–92. &
- 2005. Sex peptide causes mating costs in female Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 15: 316–321. &
- 2008. Diet quality affects mating behaviour and egg production in a wolf spider. Anim. Behav. 76: 439–445. &
- 1997. Tokens of love: Functions and regulation of drosophila male accessory gland products. Insect Biochem. Molec. 27: 179–192.
- 1997. A “good sperm” model can explain the evolution of costly multiple mating by females. Am. Nat. 149: 573–584.
- 2001. Female multiple mating as a genetic bet-hedging strategy when mate choice criteria are unreliable. Ecol. Res. 16: 605–616.
- 1996. The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 1711–1717. &
- 1997. The evolution of polyandry II: post-copulatory defenses against genetic incompatibility. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B Bio. 264: 69–75. &
- 2006. Outbred embryos rescue inbred half siblings in mixed paternity broods of live-bearing females. Nature 439: 201–203. &