Fewer invited talks by women in evolutionary biology symposia
Version of Record online: 20 JUN 2013
© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Evolutionary Biology.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume 26, Issue 9, pages 2063–2069, September 2013
How to Cite
Schroeder, J., Dugdale, H. L., Radersma, R., Hinsch, M., Buehler, D. M., Saul, J., Porter, L., Liker, A., De Cauwer, I., Johnson, P. J., Santure, A. W., Griffin, A. S., Bolund, E., Ross, L., Webb, T. J., Feulner, P. G. D., Winney, I., Szulkin, M., Komdeur, J., Versteegh, M. A., Hemelrijk, C. K., Svensson, E. I., Edwards, H., Karlsson, M., West, S. A., Barrett, E. L. B., Richardson, D. S., van den Brink, V., Wimpenny, J. H., Ellwood, S. A., Rees, M., Matson, K. D., Charmantier, A., dos Remedios, N., Schneider, N. A., Teplitsky, C., Laurance, W. F., Butlin, R. K. and Horrocks, N. P. C. (2013), Fewer invited talks by women in evolutionary biology symposia. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 26: 2063–2069. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12198
- Issue online: 21 AUG 2013
- Version of Record online: 20 JUN 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 10 MAY 2013
- Manuscript Received: 2 MAY 2013
- NERC grant. Grant Number: NE ⁄ F006071 ⁄ 1
- Volkswagen Foundation
- the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research. Grant Number: 040.11.232
- NERC post-doctoral fellowship. Grant Number: NE/I021748/1
- 2010. When does contact with successful ingroup members change self-stereotypes? A longitudinal study comparing the effect of quantity vs. quality of contact with successful individuals. Soc. Psych. 41: 203–211. , &
- 1995. Implicit gender stereotyping in judgements of fame. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 62: 181–198. &
- 2007. Gender differences in grant peer-review: a meta-analysis. J. Informetrics 1: 226–238. , &
- 2005. Publication success in Nature and Science is not gender dependent. BioEssays 27: 858–859. , &
- 2011. Scouting for talent: appointment practices of women professors in academic medicine. Soc. Sci. Med. 72: 2033–2040.
- Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP). 2007. Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. National Academies Press, Washington, US.
- 2005. Visibility matters: increasing knowledge of women's contributions to ecology. Front. Ecol. Environ. 3: 212–219. , , , , &
- 2004. Seeing is believing: exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 40: 642–658. &
- 2011. Biased sampling: no ‘Homer Simpson Effect’ among high achievers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26: 622–623. , &
- European Commission. 2011. EUR 24211 – Innovative Union competitiveness report. 2011 edn. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
- 2009. Gender and web visibility of Spanish university scholars: a case study of the Universidad Complutense de Madrid (in Spanish). Rev. Esp. Doc. Cient. 32: 51–65. , , , &
- Higher Education Statistics Agency HESA. 2012. Staff in Higher Education Institutions 2010/11. Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA), Gloucestershire.
- 2007. Gender in ecology: where are the female professors? Bull. Br. Ecol. Soc. 38: 51–62. &
- 2012. Stag parties linger: continued gender bias in a female-rich scientific discipline. PLoS ONE 7: e49682. , &
- 2006. Fair measures: a behavioral realist revision of “affirmative action”. Calif. Law Rev. 94: 1063–1118. &
- 2011. Gender differences in science: no support for the ‘Homer Simpson Effect’ among tropical researchers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26: 262–263. , &
- 2004. Do Babies Matter (Part II)? Closing the Baby Gap. Academe, November-December, Berkeley. &
- 2000. Women are teachers, Men are professors: a study of student perceptions. Teach. Sociol. 28: 283–298. &
- 2010. Disruptions in women's self-promotion: the backlash avoidance model. Psychol. Women Q. 34: 186–202. &
- NERC 2011. Natural Environment Research Council Annual Report and Accounts 2010–11. The Stationery Office, London.
- 2001. Geschlechtsunterschiede bei der Einschätzung der eigenen Intelligenz im Kindes- und Jugendalter. Z. Padagog. Psychol. 15: 207–217. &
- 2008. Persistent nepotism in peer-review. Scientometrics 74: 175–189. &
- 2007. A linguistic comparison of letters of recommendation for male and female chemistry and biochemistry job applicants. Sex Roles 57: 509–514. , &
- 2003. Frauen unterschätzen sich: Selbstbeurteilungs-Biases in einer simulierten Bewerbungssituation. Z. Sozialpsychol. 34: 147–160.
- 2004. Ethnic and gender differences in science graduation at selective colleges with implications for admission policy and college choice. Res. High. Ed. 45: 353–381. &
- 1999. The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: a National Empirical Study. Sex Roles 41: 509–528.
- 2011. STEMing the tide: using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 100: 255–270. , , &
- 2006. Gender differences in publication output: towards an unbiased metric of research performance. PLoS ONE 1: e127. , , , &
- 2006. Web links and gender in science: an exploratory analysis. Scientometrics 67: 373–383. , &
- 2003. Exploring the color of glass: letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse & Soc. 14: 191–220. &
- 1999. Why so slow? The advancement of women. The MIT press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.