SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Asgari, S., Dasgupta, N. & Cote, N.G. 2010. When does contact with successful ingroup members change self-stereotypes? A longitudinal study comparing the effect of quantity vs. quality of contact with successful individuals. Soc. Psych. 41: 203211.
  • Banaji, M.R. & Greenwald, A.G. 1995. Implicit gender stereotyping in judgements of fame. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 62: 181198.
  • Bornmann, L., Mutz, R. & Daniel, H.-D. 2007. Gender differences in grant peer-review: a meta-analysis. J. Informetrics 1: 226238.
  • Braisher, T.L., Symonds, M.R.E. & Gemmell, N.J. 2005. Publication success in Nature and Science is not gender dependent. BioEssays 27: 858859.
  • van den Brink, M. 2011. Scouting for talent: appointment practices of women professors in academic medicine. Soc. Sci. Med. 72: 20332040.
  • Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP). 2007. Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. National Academies Press, Washington, US.
  • Damschen, E.I., Rosenfeld, K.M., Wyer, M., Murphy-Medley, D., Wentworth, T.R. & Haddad, N.M. 2005. Visibility matters: increasing knowledge of women's contributions to ecology. Front. Ecol. Environ. 3: 212219.
  • Dasgupta, N. & Asgari, S. 2004. Seeing is believing: exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 40: 642658.
  • Dugdale, H.L., Hinsch, M. & Schroeder, J. 2011. Biased sampling: no ‘Homer Simpson Effect’ among high achievers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26: 622623.
  • European Commission. 2011. EUR 24211 – Innovative Union competitiveness report. 2011 edn. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
  • Fernandez, M., Zamora, H., Ortega, J.L., Utrilla, A.M. & Aguillo, I.F. 2009. Gender and web visibility of Spanish university scholars: a case study of the Universidad Complutense de Madrid (in Spanish). Rev. Esp. Doc. Cient. 32: 5165.
  • Higher Education Statistics Agency HESA. 2012. Staff in Higher Education Institutions 2010/11. Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA), Gloucestershire.
  • Holt, A. & Webb, T. 2007. Gender in ecology: where are the female professors? Bull. Br. Ecol. Soc. 38: 5162.
  • Isbell, L., Young, P.T. & Harcourt, A.H. 2012. Stag parties linger: continued gender bias in a female-rich scientific discipline. PLoS ONE 7: e49682.
  • Kang, J. & Banaji, M.R. 2006. Fair measures: a behavioral realist revision of “affirmative action”. Calif. Law Rev. 94: 10631118.
  • Laurance, W.F., Laurance, S.G. & Useche, D.C. 2011. Gender differences in science: no support for the ‘Homer Simpson Effect’ among tropical researchers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26: 262263.
  • Mason, M.A. & Goulden, M. 2004. Do Babies Matter (Part II)? Closing the Baby Gap. Academe, November-December, Berkeley.
  • Miller, J.A. & Chamberlin, M. 2000. Women are teachers, Men are professors: a study of student perceptions. Teach. Sociol. 28: 283298.
  • Moss-Racusin, C.A. & Rudman, L.A. 2010. Disruptions in women's self-promotion: the backlash avoidance model. Psychol. Women Q. 34: 186202.
  • NERC 2011. Natural Environment Research Council Annual Report and Accounts 2010–11. The Stationery Office, London.
  • Rammstedt, B. & Rammsayer, T.H. 2001. Geschlechtsunterschiede bei der Einschätzung der eigenen Intelligenz im Kindes- und Jugendalter. Z. Padagog. Psychol. 15: 207217.
  • Sandström, U. & Hällsten, M. 2008. Persistent nepotism in peer-review. Scientometrics 74: 175189.
  • Schmader, T., Whitehead, J. & Wysocki, V.H. 2007. A linguistic comparison of letters of recommendation for male and female chemistry and biochemistry job applicants. Sex Roles 57: 509514.
  • Sieverding, M. 2003. Frauen unterschätzen sich: Selbstbeurteilungs-Biases in einer simulierten Bewerbungssituation. Z. Sozialpsychol. 34: 147160.
  • Smyth, F.L. & McArdle, J.J. 2004. Ethnic and gender differences in science graduation at selective colleges with implications for admission policy and college choice. Res. High. Ed. 45: 353381.
  • Steinpreis, R. 1999. The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: a National Empirical Study. Sex Roles 41: 509528.
  • Stout, J.G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M. & McManus, M.A. 2011. STEMing the tide: using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 100: 255270.
  • Symonds, M.R.E., Gemmel, N.J., Braisher, T.L., Gorringe, K.L. & Elgar, M.A. 2006. Gender differences in publication output: towards an unbiased metric of research performance. PLoS ONE 1: e127.
  • Thelwall, M., Barjak, F. & Kretschmer, H. 2006. Web links and gender in science: an exploratory analysis. Scientometrics 67: 373383.
  • Trix, F. & Psenka, C. 2003. Exploring the color of glass: letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse & Soc. 14: 191220.
  • Valian, V. 1999. Why so slow? The advancement of women. The MIT press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.