We thank Neal Feigenson and Jane Goodman-Delahunty for their thoughtful comments and suggestions on the previous draft of this article. We also thank Judge Byungkoo Cho for his generous help with locating and collecting Korean trial records and references. This research was supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea awarded to the first and the third authors (NRF-2010-330-B00312).
Original Article
You have free access to this content
Judge-Jury Agreement in Criminal Cases: The First Three Years of the Korean Jury System
Article first published online: 18 JAN 2013
DOI: 10.1111/jels.12001
© 2013, Copyright the Authors. Journal compilation © 2013, Cornell Law School and Wiley Periodicals, Inc
Additional Information
How to Cite
Kim, S., Park, J., Park, K. and Eom, J.-S. (2013), Judge-Jury Agreement in Criminal Cases: The First Three Years of the Korean Jury System. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 10: 35–53. doi: 10.1111/jels.12001
Publication History
- Issue published online: 18 JAN 2013
- Article first published online: 18 JAN 2013
Funded by
- National Research Foundation. Grant Number: NRF-2010-330-B00312
References
- , & (2005) Jury System and Civil Participation in Law. Seoul, Korea: Jip-Mun Dang.
- , , & (2001) Managing Prejudicial Publicity: An Empirical Study of Criminal Jury Trials in New South Wales. Law and Justice Foundation of New South Wales.
- , , , , , , & (2005) “Judge-Jury Agreement in Criminal Cases: A Partial Replication of Kalven and Zeisel's The American Jury,” 2(1) J. of Empirical Legal Studies 171.Direct Link:
- (1981) Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2d ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
- (2011) “Japan's Saiban-in (a Quasi-Jury) and Kensatsu Shinsakai (a Grand Jury or Prosecution Review Commission) Systems and Their Impact on Judicial Judgments,” paper presented at the 2011 Judicial Research and Training Institute Symposium. Goyang, South Korea.
- , & (1998) “Diagnostic Test Methodology in the Design and Analysis of Judge-Jury Agreement Studies,” 39 Jurimetrics 59.
- , & (2004) “A Re-Examination of the 1966 Kalven-Zeisel Study of Judge-Jury Agreements and Disagreements and Their Causes,” 3 Law, Probability, & Risk 169.
- , , , , , , & (2008) Practices, Policies and Procedures that Influence Juror Satisfaction in Australia. Australian Institute of Criminology.
- , , , & (2002) Are Hung Juries a Problem? Available at <http://www.ncsconline.org/WC/Publications/BesJuriesHungJunesPub.pdf>.
- , & (1991) “The Twenty-Fifth Anniversary of The American Juries,” 16 Law & Social Inquiry 323.
- , & (1994) “Trial Complexity: A Field Investigation of its Meaning and its Effects,” 18 Law & Human Behavior 29.
- (2010) “Problems and Solutions for Implementing the Jury Trials,” 21(2) Hanyang Law 33.
- , & (1966) The American Jury. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
- (2003) A Study on the American Jury System. Seoul, Korea: Ehwa Women's Univ. Press.
- , & (1998–2010) Mplus User's Guide, 6th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
- , & (1990) “Practical Implications of Psychological Research on Juror and Jury Decision Making,” 16 Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 90.
- , & (1986) “The Impacts of Evidence and Extralegal Factors in Jurors' Decisions,” 20 Law & Society Rev. 423.
- (2007) “Estimating the Accuracy of Jury Verdicts,” 4 J. of Empirical Legal Studies 305.Direct Link:

1740-1461/asset/JELS_left.gif?v=1&s=19c48a9cf9a24107547fae4fba241675f19a6ab5)
1740-1461/asset/JELS_centre.gif?v=1&s=852095d9d5ce1295381ad7dae609cdf2d4b6a32a)
1740-1461/asset/JELS_right.gif?v=1&s=5956eb22c4ac82deed3c989a43d3935e4de9d461)
