Get access

Effect of configuration factor on gap formation in hybrid composite resin, low-shrinkage composite resin and resin-modified glass ionomer

Authors

  • Parvin M. Boroujeni,

    1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University Khorasgan Branch, Isfahan, Iran
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Sayyed M. Mousavinasab,

    1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University Khorasgan Branch, Isfahan, Iran
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Elham Hasanli

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University Khorasgan Branch, Isfahan, Iran
    • Correspondence

      Elham Hasanli, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University Khorasgan Branch, Isfahan, Iran.

      Tel: +98-917-3033708

      Fax: +98-311-5354053

      Email: Dr.Hasanli@yahoo.com

    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Aim

Polymerization shrinkage is one of the important factors in creation of gap between dental structure and composite resin restorations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of configuration factor (C-factor) on gap formation in a hybrid composite resin, a low shrinkage composite resin and a resin modified glass ionomer restorative material.

Methods

Cylindrical dentin cavities with 5.0 mm diameter and three different depths (1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 mm) were prepared on the occlusal surface of 99 human molars and the cavities assigned into three groups (each of 33). Each group contained three subgroups depend on the different depths and then cavities restored using resin modified glass ionomer (Fuji II LC Improved) and two type composite resins (Filtek P90 and Filtek Z250). Then the restorations were cut into two sections in a mesiodistal direction in the middle of restorations. Gaps were measured on mesial, distal and pulpal floor of the cavities, using a stereomicroscope.

Results

Data analyses using Kruskal–Wallist and Mann–Whitney tests. Increasing C-factor from 1.8 to 3.4 had no effect on the gap formation in two type composite resins, but Fuji II LC Improved showed significant effect of increasing C-factor on gap formation. Taken together, when C-factor increased from 1.8 up to 3.4 had no significant effect on gap formation in two tested resin composites. Although, Filtek P90 restorations showed smaller gap formation in cavities walls compared to Filtek Z250 restorations.

Conclusions

High C-factor values generated the largest gap formation. Silorane-based composite was more efficient for cavity sealing than methacrylate-based composites and resin modified glass ionomer.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary