SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anderson-Teixeira, K. J., P. K. Snyder, T. E. Twine, S. V. Cuadra, M. H. Costa, and E. H. DeLucia. 2012. Climate-regulation services of natural and agricultural ecoregions of the Americas. Nature Climate Change 2(3): 177181.
  • Anderson-Teixeira, K. J., M. D. Masters, C. K. Black, M. Zeri, M. Z. Hussain, C. J. Bernacchi, and E. H. DeLucia. 2013. Altered belowground carbon cycling following land-use change to perennial bioenergy crops. Ecosystems 16(3): 113.
  • Arvesen, A., R. M. Bright, and E. G. Hertwich. 2011. Considering only first-order effects? How simplifications lead to unrealistic technology optimism in climate change mitigation. Energy Policy 39(11): 74487454.
  • Berndes, G., N. Bird, and A. Cowie. 2010. Bioenergy, land use change and climate change mitigation. Whakarewarewa, Rotorua, New Zealand: IEA Bioenergy.
  • Bird, N., A. Cowie, F. Cherubini, and G. Jungmeier. 2011. Using a life cycle assessment approach to estimate the net greenhouse gas emissions of bioenergy. Whakarewarewa, Rotorua, New Zealand: IEA Bioenergy.
  • Boucher, O., P. Friedlingstein, B. Collins, and K. Shine. 2009. The indirect global warming potential and global temperature change potential due to methane oxidation. Environmental Research Letters 4(4): 044007. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044007
  • Brakkee, K., M. Huijbregts, B. Eickhout, A. Jan Hendriks, and D. van de Meent. 2008. Characterisation factors for greenhouse gases at a midpoint level including indirect effects based on calculations with the IMAGE model. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13(3): 191201.
  • Brandão, M., G. Heath, and J. Cooper. 2012. What can meta-analyses tell us about the reliability of life cycle assessment for decision support? Journal of Industrial Ecology 16(Supplement s1): S3S7.
  • Bright, R. M., F. Cherubini, and A. H. Strømman. 2012. Climate impacts of bioenergy: Inclusion of carbon cycle and albedo dynamics in life cycle impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 37: 211.
  • BSI (British Standards Institution). 2008. PAS 2050: 2008, specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. London: British Standards Institution.
  • Cherubini, F., N. D. Bird, A. Cowie, G. Jungmeier, B. Schlamadinger, and S. Woess-Gallasch. 2009. Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 53(9): 434447.
  • Chester, M. and E. Martin. 2009. Cellulosic ethanol from municipal solid waste: A case study of the economic, energy, and greenhouse gas impacts in California. Environmental Science & Technology 43(14): 51835189.
  • Chiaramonti, D. and L. Recchia. 2010. Is life cycle assessment (LCA) a suitable method for quantitative CO2 saving estimations? The impact of field input on the LCA results for a pure vegetable oil chain. Biomass and Bioenergy 34(5): 787797.
  • Chum, H., A. Faaij, J. Moreira, G. Berndes, P. Dhamija, H. Dong, B. Gabrielle, et al. 2011. Bioenergy. In IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation, edited by O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth, P. Matschoss, S. Kadner, T. Zwickel, et al. Cambridge, UK, and New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Creutzig, F., A. Popp, R. J. Plevin, G. Luderer, J. Minx, and O. Edenhofer. 2012. Reconciling top-down and bottom-up modeling on future bioenergy deployment. Nature Climate Change 2: 320327.
  • Curran, M. A., M. Mann, and G. Norris. 2005. The international workshop on electricity data for life cycle inventories. Journal of Cleaner Production 13(8): 853862.
  • de Gorter, H. 2010. Does US corn-ethanol really reduce emissions by 21%? Lessons for Europe. Biofuels 1(5): 671673.
  • DeCicco, J. 2012. Biofuels and carbon management. Climatic Change 111(3–4): 627640.
  • Delucchi, M. A. 2010. Impacts of biofuels on climate change, water use, and land use. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1195(1): 2845.
  • Delucchi, M. A. 2011a. A conceptual framework for estimating the climate impacts of land-use change due to energy crop programs. Biomass and Bioenergy 35(6): 23372360.
  • Delucchi, M. A. 2011b. Beyond lifecycle analysis: Developing a better tool for simulating policy impacts. In Sustainable transportation energy pathways, edited by J. M. Ogden and L. Anderson. Davis, CA, USA: Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California Davis.
  • Deuber, O., G. Luderer, and O. Edenhofer. 2013. Physico-economic evaluation of climate metrics: A conceptual framework. Environmental Science & Policy 29: 3745.
  • Dumortier, J., D. J. Hayes, M. Carriquiry, F. Dong, X. Du, A. Elobeid, J. F. Fabiosa, and S. Tokgoz. 2011. Sensitivity of carbon emission estimates from indirect land-use change. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 33(3): 428448.
  • Earles, J. and A. Halog. 2011. Consequential life cycle assessment: A review. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 16(5): 445453.
  • EC-JRC-IES (European Commission–Joint Research Centre–Institute for Environment and Sustainability). 2010. International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) handbook—General guide for life cycle assessment—Detailed guidance, 1st ed. Luxembourg: European Commission–Joint Research Centre.
  • Ehrenfeld, J. R. 1997. The importance of LCAs—Warts and all. Journal of Industrial Ecology 1(2): 4149.
  • Ekvall, T. and A. Andrae. 2006. Attributional and consequential environmental assessment of the shift to lead-free solders. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 11(5): 344353.
  • Ekvall, T., A.-M. Tillman, and S. Molander. 2005. Normative ethics and methodology for life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production 13(13–14): 12251234.
  • Ekvall, T., G. Assefa, A. Björklund, O. Eriksson, and G. Finnveden. 2007. What life-cycle assessment does and does not do in assessments of waste management. Waste Management 27(8): 989996.
  • European Parliament. 2009. Renewable Energy Directive 2009/28/EC, edited by European Parliament: Official Journal of the European Union. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:140:0016:0062:EN:PDF. Accessed 19 September 2013.
  • Farrell, A. E., R. J. Plevin, B. T. Turner, M. O'Hare, A. D. Jones, and D. M. Kammen. 2006. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 311(5760): 506508.
  • Finkbeiner, M. 2009. Carbon footprinting—Opportunities and threats. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 14(2): 9194.
  • Finnveden, G. 2000. On the limitations of life cycle assessment and environmental systems analysis tools in general. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 5(4): 229238.
  • Finnveden, G. R., M. Z. Hauschild, T. Ekvall, J. Guinèe, R. Heijungs, S. Hellweg, A. Koehler, D. Pennington, and S. Suh. 2009. Recent developments in life cycle assessment. Journal of Environmental Management 91(1): 121.
  • Forster, P., V. Ramaswamy, P. Artaxo, T. Berntsen, R. Betts, D. W. Fahey, J. Haywood, et al. 2007. Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor, and H. L. Miller. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fritsche, U. R., R. E. H. Sims, and A. Monti. 2010. Direct and indirect land-use competition issues for energy crops and their sustainable production—An overview. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 4(6): 692704.
  • Fuglestvedt, J. S., K. P. Shine, T. Berntsen, J. Cook, D. S. Lee, A. Stenke, R. B. Skeie, G. J. M. Velders, and I. A. Waitz. 2010. Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Metrics. Atmospheric Environment 44(37): 46484677.
  • Fulton, L., P. Cazzola, F. O. Cuenot, K. Kojima, T. Onoda, J. Staub, and M. Taylor. 2009. Transport, energy and CO2: Moving toward sustainability. Paris: International Energy Agency (IEA/OECD).
  • Galdos, M., O. Cavalett, J. E. A. Seabra, L. A. H. Nogueira, and A. Bonomi. 2013. Trends in global warming and human health impacts related to Brazilian sugarcane ethanol production considering black carbon emissions. Applied Energy 104: 576582.
  • Gawel, E. and G. Ludwig. 2011. The iLUC dilemma: How to deal with indirect land use changes when governing energy crops? Land Use Policy 28(4): 846856.
  • Groves, D. G. and R. J. Lempert. 2007. A new analytic method for finding policy-relevant scenarios. Global Environmental Change 17(1): 7385.
  • Hall, J. W., R. J. Lempert, K. Keller, A. Hackbarth, C. Mijere, and D. J. McInerney. 2012. Robust climate policies under uncertainty: A comparison of robust decision making and info-gap methods. Risk Analysis 32(10): 16571672.
  • Heath, G. A. and M. K. Mann. 2012. Background and reflections on the life cycle assessment harmonization project. Journal of Industrial Ecology 16(Supplement s1): s8s11.
  • Heijungs, R. and J. B. Guinée. 2007. Allocation and ‘what-if’ scenarios in life cycle assessment of waste management systems. Waste Management 27(8): 9971005.
  • Heijungs, R., A. de Koning, S. Suh, and G. Huppes. 2006. Toward an information tool for integrated product policy: Requirements for data and computation. Journal of Industrial Ecology 10(3): 147158.
  • Hendrickson, C. T., L. B. Lave, and H. S. Matthews. 2006. Environmental life cycle assessment of goods and services: An input-output approach. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
  • Hertwich, E. G., J. K. Hammitt, and W. S. Pease. 2000. A theoretical foundation for life-cycle assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology 4(1): 1328.
  • Hoefnagels, R., E. Smeets, and A. Faaij. 2010. Greenhouse gas footprints of different biofuel production systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14(7): 16611694.
  • ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2006a. ISO 14044: Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Requirements and guidelines. ISO 14044:2006(E). Geneva: International Standards Organization.
  • ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2006b. ISO 14040: Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework. ISO 14040:2006(E). Geneva: International Standards Organization.
  • Khanna, M. and C. L. Crago. 2012. Measuring indirect land use change with biofuels: Implications for policy. Annual Review of Resource Economics 4(1): 161184.
  • Kløverpris, J., H. Wenzel, and P. Nielsen. 2008. Life cycle inventory modelling of land use induced by crop consumption: Part 1: Conceptual analysis and methodological proposal. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13(1): 1321.
  • Lasswell, H. D. and A. Kaplan. 1950. Power and society: A framework for political inquiry, Yale Law School studies, v. 2. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale University Press.
  • Lenzen, M. 2000. Errors in conventional and input-output-based life-cycle inventories. Journal of Industrial Ecology 4(4): 127148.
  • Lipman, T. E. and M. A. Delucchi. 2010. Expected greenhouse gas reductions by battery, fuel cell, and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. In Electric and hybrid vehicles: Power sources, models, sustainability, infrastructure and the market, edited by G. Pistoia. Amsterdam: Elsevier, B. V.
  • Majeau-Bettez, G., A. H. Strømman, and E. G. Hertwich. 2011. Evaluation of process- and input-output-based life cycle inventory data with regard to truncation and aggregation issues. Environmental Science & Technology 45(23): 1017010177.
  • Malça, J. and F. Freire. 2010. Uncertainty analysis in biofuel systems. Journal of Industrial Ecology 14(2): 322334.
  • Manning, M. and A. Reisinger. 2011. Broader perspectives for comparing different greenhouse gases. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 369(1943): 18911905.
  • McKone, T. E., W. W. Nazaroff, P. Berck, M. Auffhammer, T. Lipman, M. S. Torn, E. Masanet, et al. 2011. Grand challenges for life-cycle assessment of biofuels. Environmental Science & Technology 45(5): 17511756.
  • Moura, M. C. P., D. A. Castelo Branco, G. P. Peters, A. S. Szklo, and R. Schaeffer. 2013. How the choice of multi-gas equivalency metrics affects mitigation options: The case of CO2 capture in a Brazilian coal-fired power plant. Energy Policy 61: 13571366.
  • Owens, J. W. 1997. Life-cycle assessment: Constraints on moving from inventory to impact assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology 1(1): 3749.
  • Plevin, R. J. 2009. Modeling corn ethanol and climate: A critical comparison of the BESS and GREET models. Journal of Industrial Ecology 13(4): 495507.
  • Rajagopal, D. and R. J. Plevin. 2013. Implications of market-mediated emissions and uncertainty for biofuel policies. Energy Policy 56: 7582.
  • Rajagopal, D., G. Hochman, and D. Zilberman. 2011. Indirect fuel use change (IFUC) and the lifecycle environmental impact of biofuel policies. Energy Policy 39(1): 228233.
  • Reap, J., F. Roman, S. Duncan, and B. Bras. 2008a. A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment—Part 2: Impact assessment and interpretation. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13(5): 374388.
  • Reap, J., F. Roman, S. Duncan, and B. Bras. 2008b. A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment—Part 1: Goal and scope and inventory analysis. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13(4): 290300.
  • Reinhard, J. and R. Zah. 2011. Consequential life cycle assessment of the environmental impacts of an increased rapemethylester (RME) production in Switzerland. Biomass and Bioenergy 35(6): 23612373.
  • Sarewitz, D. 2004. How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science & Policy 7(5): 385403.
  • Sathre, R., M. Chester, J. Cain, and E. Masanet. 2012. A framework for environmental assessment of CO2 capture and storage systems. Energy 37(1): 540548.
  • Schmidt, J. 2008. System delimitation in agricultural consequential LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13(4): 350364.
  • Schmidt, J. and B. Weidema. 2008. Shift in the marginal supply of vegetable oil. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13(3): 235239.
  • Shine, K. 2009. The global warming potential—The need for an interdisciplinary retrial. Climatic Change 96(4): 467472.
  • Smith, S. J. and T. M. L. Wigley. 2000a. Global warming potentials: 2. Accuracy. Climatic Change 44(4): 459469.
  • Smith, S. J. and M. L. Wigley. 2000b. Global warming potentials: 1. Climatic implications of emissions reductions. Climatic Change 44(4): 445457.
  • Suh, S., M. Lenzen, G. J. Treloar, H. Hondo, A. Horvath, G. Huppes, O. Jolliet, et al. 2004. System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches. Environmental Science and Technology 38(3): 657664.
  • Tillman, A.-M. 2000. Significance of decision-making for LCA methodology. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20(1): 113123.
  • Tol, R. S. J., T. K. Berntsen, B. C. O'Neill, J. S. Fuglestvedt, and K. P. Shine. 2012. A unifying framework for metrics for aggregating the climate effect of different emissions. Environmental Research Letters 7(4): 044006. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044006
  • Udo de Haes, H. A. 1993. Applications of life cycle assessment: Expectations, drawbacks and perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production 1(3–4): 131137.
  • USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 2010. Renewable Fuel Standard Program (RFS2) regulatory impact analysis. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.
  • van der Voet, E., R. J. Lifset, and L. Luo. 2010. Life-cycle assessment of biofuels, convergence and divergence. Biofuels 1(3): 435449.
  • Wang, M., H. Huo, and S. Arora. 2011. Methods of dealing with co-products of biofuels in life-cycle analysis and consequent results within the U.S. context. Energy Policy 39(10): 57265736.
  • Wang, M., J. Han, J. B. Dunn, H. Cai, and A. Elgowainy. 2012. Well-to-wheels energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ethanol from corn, sugarcane and cellulosic biomass for US use. Environmental Research Letters 7(4): 045905.
  • Wardenaar, T., T. van Ruijven, A. Beltran, K. Vad, J. Guinée, and R. Heijungs. 2012. Differences between LCA for analysis and LCA for policy: A case study on the consequences of allocation choices in bio-energy policies. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 17(8): 10591067.
  • Weidema, B. 2003. Market information in life cycle assessment. 2.0 LCA Consultants for the Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Environmental project no. 863. www.norlca.org/resources/780.pdf. Accessed 19 September 2013.
  • Whitefoot, K. S., H. G. Grimes-Casey, C. E. Girata, W. R. Morrow, J. J. Winebrake, G. A. Keoleian, and S. J. Skerlos. 2011. Consequential life cycle assessment with market-driven design. Journal of Industrial Ecology 15(5): 726742.
  • Wicke, B., P. Verweij, H. van Meijl, D. P. van Vuuren, and A. P. C. Faaij. 2012. Indirect land use change: Review of existing models and strategies for mitigation. Biofuels 3(1): 87100.
  • York, R. 2012. Do alternative energy sources displace fossil fuels? Nature Climate Change 2(6): 441443.
  • Zamagni, A., J. Guinée, R. Heijungs, P. Masoni, and A. Raggi. 2012. Lights and shadows in consequential LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 17(7): 904918.