Practical, Ethical, and Legal Challenges Underlying Crisis Standards of Care

Authors

  • James G. Hodge Jr.,

    1. Lincoln Professor of Health Law and Ethics at the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law at Arizona State University.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Dan Hanfling,

    1. Special Advisor of Emergency Preparedness and Response at Inova Health System and a Clinical Professor in the Department of Emergency Medicine at George Washington University.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Tia P. Powell

    1. Director of the Montefiore-Einstein Center for Bioethics and a Professor of Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Psychiatry at Albert Einstein College of Medicine.
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Public health emergencies implicate difficult decisions among medical and emergency first responders about how to allocate essential resources. While various actors have proffered approaches on how to make these tough choices, meaningful guidance on shifting standards of care in major emergencies remained lacking. In March 2012, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) released additional guidance to assist facilities and practitioners to address scarce resource allocation through the development of “crisis standards of care” in catastrophes. As discussed in the article, identifying and resolving of complex practical, ethical, and legal challenges underlying real-time implementation of these standards are indispensable to protecting the public's health.

Ancillary