Get access

Beyond the functional matrix hypothesis: a network null model of human skull growth for the formation of bone articulations

Authors

  • Borja Esteve-Altava,

    1. Theoretical Biology Research Group, Cavanilles Institute for Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Diego Rasskin-Gutman

    Corresponding author
    1. Theoretical Biology Research Group, Cavanilles Institute for Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
    • Correspondence

      Diego Rasskin-Gutman, Theoretical Biology Research Group, Institute Cavanilles for Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, University of Valencia, Valencia 46071, Spain. T/F: 34963544463; E: diego.rasskin@uv.es

    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Craniofacial sutures and synchondroses form the boundaries among bones in the human skull, providing functional, developmental and evolutionary information. Bone articulations in the skull arise due to interactions between genetic regulatory mechanisms and epigenetic factors such as functional matrices (soft tissues and cranial cavities), which mediate bone growth. These matrices are largely acknowledged for their influence on shaping the bones of the skull; however, it is not fully understood to what extent functional matrices mediate the formation of bone articulations. Aiming to identify whether or not functional matrices are key developmental factors guiding the formation of bone articulations, we have built a network null model of the skull that simulates unconstrained bone growth. This null model predicts bone articulations that arise due to a process of bone growth that is uniform in rate, direction and timing. By comparing predicted articulations with the actual bone articulations of the human skull, we have identified which boundaries specifically need the presence of functional matrices for their formation. We show that functional matrices are necessary to connect facial bones, whereas an unconstrained bone growth is sufficient to connect non-facial bones. This finding challenges the role of the brain in the formation of boundaries between bones in the braincase without neglecting its effect on skull shape. Ultimately, our null model suggests where to look for modified developmental mechanisms promoting changes in bone growth patterns that could affect the development and evolution of the head skeleton.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary