Knowledge and use of pressure ulcer preventive measures in nursing homes: a comparison of Dutch and German nursing staff

Authors

  • Esther Meesterberends RN, MSc,

    PhD Student, Corresponding author
    1. Department of Health Services Research, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
    • Correspondence: Esther Meesterberends, PhD Student, Department of Health Services Research, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, 6229 GT Maastricht, the Netherlands. Telephone: +31 433881553.

      E-mail: e.meesterberends@maastrichtuniversity.nl

    Search for more papers by this author
  • Doris Wilborn RN, MA, PhD,

    Professor
    1. Department Pflege und Management, University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Christa Lohrmann RN, MA, PhD,

    Professor
    1. Department of Nursing Science, Medical University of Graz, Graz, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jos MGA Schols MD, PhD,

    Professor
    1. Department of Health Services Research, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Ruud JG Halfens PhD

    Associate Professor
    1. Department of Health Services Research, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Aims and objectives

To examine the knowledge and use of pressure ulcer preventive measures among nursing staff in Dutch and German nursing homes.

Background

Studies in the Netherlands and Germany have shown a large discrepancy in pressure ulcer prevalence rates among nursing homes in both countries and concluded that some of this variance could be explained by differences in pressure ulcer prevention.

Design

A cross-sectional questionnaire survey nested in a prospective multicenter cohort study.

Methods

A questionnaire was distributed to nursing staff employed in 10 Dutch nursing homes (= 600) and 11 German nursing homes (= 578). Data were collected in January 2009.

Results

The response rate was 75·7% in the Netherlands (n = 454) and 48·4% in Germany (n = 283). Knowledge about useful pressure ulcer preventive measures was moderate in both countries, while nonuseful preventive measures were poorly known. On average, only 19·2% (the Netherlands) and 24·6% (Germany) of preventive measures were judged correctly as nonuseful. The same pattern could be seen with regard to the use of preventive measures, because nonuseful preventive measures were still commonly used according to the respondents.

Conclusions

The results indicate that the respondents' knowledge and use of pressure ulcer preventive measures could be improved in both countries, especially for nonuseful measures. Changes and improvements can be achieved by providing sufficient education and refresher courses for nurses and nursing assistants employed within Dutch and German nursing homes.

Relevance to clinical practice

Recurring education about pressure ulcer prevention is required among nursing staff employed in Dutch and German nursing homes, particularly in relation to the use of ineffective and outdated preventive measures. Obstacles regarding the implementation of preventive measures should be addressed to achieve a change in practice.

Ancillary