Get access

Characteristics of nursing home residents and physical restraint: a systematic literature review

Authors

  • Hedi Hofmann MNS, EdN, RN,

    Head of the Master of Science in Nursing Program, PhD-Student, Corresponding author
    1. Department of Health, University of Applied Sciences, St. Gallen, Switzerland
    2. Doctoral Program of the University Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany
    • Correspondence: Hedi Hofmann, Head of the Master of Science in Nursing Program, Department of Health, University of Applied Sciences, Rosenbergstrasse 59, Postfach, CH 9001, St. Gallen, Switzerland. Telephone: +41 71 226 15 43.

      E-mail: hedi.hofmann@fhsg.ch

    Search for more papers by this author
  • Sabine Hahn PhD, MNS, CNS, RN

    Professor and Head of Applied Research and Development in Nursing
    1. Section of Health, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Aims and objectives

To analyse and to summarise factors associated with nursing home residents' characteristics which could lead to physical restraint, and to investigate the consequences of physical restraint use for this population.

Background

Even though the application of physical restraint is highly controversial, prevalence rates show that it is a common intervention in nursing homes. Residents' characteristics seem to be important to predict the use of physical restraint. Evidence suggests that restrained nursing home residents may have physical and psychological disadvantages as a consequence of being restrained.

Methods

A systematic literature research involving the databases PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ISI Web of Science and Cochrane Library was carried out for articles published from January 2005–November 2011. Nine Studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and the quality assessment.

Results

Restrained residents had low activities of daily living (ADL) scores and severe cognitive impairment. Residents with low cognitive status and serious mobility impairments were at high risk to be restrained, as well as residents with previous fall and/or fracture. Repeated verbal and physical agitation was found to be positively associated with restraint use. Possible consequences of physical restraint were as follows: lower cognitive and ADL performance, higher walking dependence, furthermore falls, pressure ulcers, urinary and faecal incontinence.

Conclusions

This systematic literature review reveals notable resident-related factors for physical restraint use. The consequences of restraint seem to negatively influence residents' physical and psychological well-being. Physical restraint seems to be an important risk factor for residents' further health problems.

Relevance to clinical practice

Resident's characteristics appear to be decisive factors for the use of physical restraint. Nurses need a high level of expertise and competence in evaluating the individual residents′ situation and deciding further steps, with respect for the autonomy and dignity of the person.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary