The Wall Street Walk when Blockholders Compete for Flows

Authors

  • AMIL DASGUPTA,

  • GIORGIA PIACENTINO

    Search for more papers by this author
    • Dasgupta is at the London School of Economics, and is affiliated with CEPR and ECGI. Piacentino is at the Olin Business School at Washington University in St Louis. We thank the referee, Associate Editor, and Editor, Cam Harvey, for insightful input. We are grateful to Ulf Axelson, Alon Brav, Elena Carletti, Alex Edmans, Simon Gervais, Oliver Hart, Wei Jiang, Arvind Krishnamurthy, Yan Li, Xuewen Liu, Mark Lowenstein, Andrey Malenko, Gustavo Manso, David Reeb, Zacharias Sautner, Rik Sen, Anand Srinivasan, Dimitri Vayanos, Michela Verardo, Ernst Ludvig von Thadden, Liyan Yang, and audiences at AFA 2013, Amsterdam, Cambridge, Duke Fuqua, EUI Florence, FIRS 2012, HKUST, Imperial, Leicester, LSE, Mannheim, Northwestern Kellogg, Nottingham, NUS, Rome Tor Vergata, Stockholm, Tilburg, WFA 2012, the 5th Conference of the Paul Woolley Centre, and UCL for helpful comments. We thank the Paul Woolley Centre at LSE for financial support. Dasgupta thanks the Faculty of Economics at Cambridge University for its kind hospitality. We have read The Journal of Finance's disclosure policy and have no conflicts of interest to disclose.


ABSTRACT

Effective monitoring by equity blockholders is important for good corporate governance. A prominent theoretical literature argues that the threat of block sale (“exit”) can be an effective governance mechanism. Many blockholders are money managers. We show that, when money managers compete for investor capital, the threat of exit loses credibility, weakening its governance role. Money managers with more skin in the game will govern more successfully using exit. Allowing funds to engage in activist measures (“voice”) does not alter our qualitative results. Our results link widely prevalent incentives in the ever-expanding money management industry to the nature of corporate governance.

Ancillary