• 1
    Mocanu EV, Cottell E, Waite K, Hennelly B, Collins C, Harrison RF. Frozen-thawed transfer cycles: Are they comparable with fresh? Ir Med J 2008; 101: 181184.
  • 2
    Balaban B, Urman B, Ata B et al. A randomized controlled study of human Day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: Vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 19761982.
  • 3
    Zheng WT, Zhuang GL, Zhou CQ et al. Comparison of the survival of human biopsied embryos after cryopreservation with four different methods using non-transferable embryos. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 16151618.
  • 4
    Machtinger R, Dor J, Levron J, Mashiach S, Levran D, Seidman DS. The effect of prolonged cryopreservation on embryo survival. Gynecol Endocrinol 2002; 16: 293298.
  • 5
    Guerif F, Bidault R, Cadoret V, Couet ML, Lansac J, Royere D. Parameters guiding selection of best embryos for transfer after cryopreservation: A reappraisal. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 13211326.
  • 6
    Gabrielsen A, Fedder J, Agerholm I. Parameters predicting the implantation rate of thawed IVF/ICSI embryos: A retrospective study. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 12: 7076.
  • 7
    Edirisinghe R, Jemmott R, Allan J. Comparison of growth rates of fresh and frozen-thawed embryos according to chromosomal status. J Assist Reprod Genet 2005; 22: 295300.
  • 8
    Stokes PJ, Hawkhead JA, Fawthrop RK et al. Metabolism of human embryos following cryopreservation: Implications for the safety and selection of embryos for transfer in clinical IVF. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 829835.
  • 9
    Sturmey RG, Brison DR, Leese HJ. Symposium: Innovative techniques in human embryo viability assessment. Assessing embryo viability by measurement of amino acid turnover. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 17: 486496.
  • 10
    Marhuenda-Egea FC, Martínez-Sabater E, Gonsálvez-Alvarez R, Lledó B, Ten J, Bernabeu R. A crucial step in assisted reproduction technology: Human embryo selection using metabolomic evaluation. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 772774.
  • 11
    Booth PJ, Humpherson PG, Watson TJ, Leese HJ. Amino acid depletion and appearance during porcine preimplantation embryo development in vitro. Reproduction 2005; 130: 655668.
  • 12
    Houghton FD, Hawkhead JA, Humpherson PG et al. Non-invasive amino acid turnover predicts human embryo developmental capacity. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 9991005.
  • 13
    Brison DR, Houghton FD, Falconer D et al. Identification of viable embryos in IVF by non-invasive measurement of amino acid turnover. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 23192324.
  • 14
    Picton HM, Elder K, Houghton FD et al. Association between amino acid turnover and chromosome aneuploidy during human preimplantation embryo development in vitro. Mol Hum Reprod 2010; 16: 557569.
  • 15
    Guerif F, Cadoret V, Poindron J, Lansac J, Royere D. Overnight incubation improves selection of frozen-thawed blastocysts for transfer: Preliminary study using supernumerary embryos. Theriogenology 2003; 60: 14571466.
  • 16
    World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction, 4th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
  • 17
    Veeck L. Preembryo grading and degree of cytoplasmic fragmentation. In: Veeck L (ed.). An Atlas of Human Gametes and Conceptuses; An Illustrated Reference for Assisted Reproduction Technology. New York: The Parthenon Publishing Group, 1999; 4651.