Comparison of reproductive outcome, including the pattern of loss, between couples with chromosomal abnormalities and those with unexplained repeated miscarriages

Authors

  • Helen Flynn,

    1. Department of Obstetrics, The Jessop Wing, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK
    2. Medical School of Sheffield University, Sheffield, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Junhao Yan,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Obstetrics, The Jessop Wing, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK
    2. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
    • Reprint request to: Junhao Yan, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan 250021, China. Email: yyy306@126.com

    Search for more papers by this author
  • Sotirios H. Saravelos,

    1. Department of Obstetrics, The Jessop Wing, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Tin-Chiu Li

    1. Department of Obstetrics, The Jessop Wing, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK
    Search for more papers by this author

  • The work was carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jessop Wing, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHSTrust.

Abstract

Aim

Chromosomal abnormalities are an important cause of repeated miscarriage. Several studies have discussed the association between chromosomal abnormalities and repeated miscarriage. This study attempts to describe the pattern of miscarriage in this group of women and the eventual pregnancy outcome of couples with chromosomal abnormalities compared with couples with unexplained repeated pregnancy loss.

Material and Methods

This was a retrospective study involving 795 couples with repeated miscarriages.

Results

Out of 795 couples, 28 (3.52%) were found to have a chromosomal abnormality (carrier group). Over half (65.5%) of the chromosomal abnormalities were balanced reciprocal translocations. After referral, this carrier group had a total of 159 pregnancies, leading to 36 live births (22.6%) among 18 couples. The after referral miscarriage rate in the chromosomal anomaly group (55.6%) was significantly (P < 0.01) higher than that in the unexplained recurrent miscarriage group (28.1%). In couples with chromosomal anomaly, the miscarriages were more likely to occur between 6 and 12 weeks' gestation.

Conclusions

The encouraging cumulative live birth rate of 64.3% for couples with chromosomal anomaly and repeated miscarriage suggests that further attempts at natural conception are a viable option.

Ancillary