Get access

“Where Have All the Good Men Gone?” Gendered Interactions in Online Dating

Authors

  • Derek A. Kreager,

    Corresponding author
    1. Pennsylvania State University
    • Correspondence to: Department of Sociology and Crime, Law, and Justice, Pennsylvania State University, 211 Oswald Tower, University Park, PA 16802–6207 (dkreager@psu.edu).

    Search for more papers by this author
  • Shannon E. Cavanagh,

    1. University of Texas at Austin
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, G1800, Austin, TX 78712.

  • John Yen,

    1. Pennsylvania State University
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Information Sciences and Technology, Pennsylvania State University, 313J IST Building, University Park, PA 16802–6207.

  • Mo Yu

    1. Pennsylvania State University
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Information Sciences and Technology, Pennsylvania State University, 313J IST Building, University Park, PA 16802–6207.


  • This article was edited by Ariel Kalil.

Abstract

This article explores gendered patterns of online dating and their implications for heterosexual union formation. Using 6 months of online dating data from a midsized Southwestern city (N = 8,259 men, 6,274 women), the authors found that men and women tend to send messages to the most socially desirable alters in the dating market regardless of their own desirability levels. They also found that male initiators connect with more desirable partners than men who wait to be contacted, but female initiators connect with equally desirable partners as women who wait to be contacted. Female-initiated contacts are also more than twice as likely as male-initiated contacts to result in a connection, but women send 4 times fewer messages than men. Finally, the authors compared partner desirability levels over repeated exchanges and concluded that couple similarities are more likely to result from relationship termination (i.e., nonreciprocity) than initial homophilous preferences.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary