Aim
To identify and test the reliability of a fall risk screening tool in an ambulatory outpatient clinic.
By continuing to browse this site you agree to us using cookies as described in About Cookies
Remove maintenance messageCorrespondence
Michael McKay
Internal Medicine Clinic
Maine Medical Center
22 Bramhall Street
Portland
ME 04102-3175
USA
E-mail: mckaym1@mmc.org
To identify and test the reliability of a fall risk screening tool in an ambulatory outpatient clinic.
The Fall Risk Screening Tool (Albert Lea Medical Center, MN, USA) was scripted for an interview format.
Two interviewers separately screened a convenience sample of 111 patients (age ≥ 65 years) in an ambulatory outpatient clinic in a northeastern US city.
The interviewers’ scoring of fall risk categories was similar. There was good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.834–0.889) and inter-rater reliability [intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) = 0.824–0.881] for total, Risk Factor and Client's Health Status subscales. The Physical Environment scores indicated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.742) and adequate reliability (ICC = 0.688). Two Physical Environment items (furniture and medical equipment condition) had low reliabilities [Kappa (K) = 0.323, P = 0.08; K = −0.078, P = 0.648), respectively.
The scripted Fall Risk Screening Tool demonstrated good reliability in this sample. Rewording two Physical Environment items will be considered.
A reliable instrument such as the scripted Fall Risk Screening Tool provides a standardised assessment for identifying high fall risk patients. This tool is especially useful because it assesses personal, behavioural and environmental factors specific to community-dwelling patients; the interview format also facilitates patient–provider interaction.
Powered by Wiley Online Library
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All Rights Reserved