What Do We Know When We Know a Person Across Contexts? Examining Self-Concept Differentiation at the Three Levels of Personality
- This research was facilitated by a fellowship awarded to the first author and a research grant awarded to the second author, both from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
- We gratefully acknowledge the competent research assistance of Amanda Riches and Kim McWilliams and the comments and critiques of Jeremy Frimer.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to William L. Dunlop, Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4. E-mail: email@example.com.
Previous research examining self-concept differentiation (SCD) has been characterized by (a) a focus on behavioral traits and (b) the conflation of mean-level and inter-contextual differentiation. In two studies, we considered non-conflated measures of SCD at the three levels of personality description in relation to adjustment.
In Study 1, participants completed measures of adjustment, rated their behavioral tendencies (dispositional traits), produced a list of goals (characteristic adaptations), and recalled a self-defining memory (life narratives), from within professional and personal domains. In Study 2, the procedure was modified: Participants reporting either low or high levels of adjustment subsequently rated their behavioral traits, provided a list of goals, or produced a self-defining memory, from five contexts.
In Study 1, adjustment related positively to SCD at the level of characteristic adaptations but negatively to SCD at the level of life narratives. In Study 2, well-adjusted participants exhibited a greater degree of SCD at the level of characteristic adaptations but a greater degree of thematic consistency at the level of life narratives, relative to those low in adjustment.
These results highlight the dynamic nature of SCD across levels of personality and align with the notion that differentiation represents virtue and vice.