This research was partially funded by a grant from the Israel Foundations Trustees. We thank Jacob Goldenberg for his assistance in designing and running the studies, David Kenny for his help with the social relations model analyses, and Anat Bardi, IdoLiviatan and Lilach Sagiv for helpful comments on a previous version of this article. We also thank Daniella Shidlovski for her help in running Study 1 and Maya Weinstein and Jacob Shapiro for their help in collecting data for Study 2.
Source Personality and Persuasiveness: Big Five Predispositions to Being Persuasive and the Role of Message Involvement
Version of Record online: 12 AUG 2013
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Journal of Personality
Volume 82, Issue 3, pages 250–264, June 2014
How to Cite
Oreg, S. and Sverdlik, N. (2014), Source Personality and Persuasiveness: Big Five Predispositions to Being Persuasive and the Role of Message Involvement. Journal of Personality, 82: 250–264. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12049
- Issue online: 28 APR 2014
- Version of Record online: 12 AUG 2013
- Accepted manuscript online: 11 JUN 2013 06:12AM EST
- Israel Foundations Trustees
In the present studies we incorporate a Person × Situation perspective into the study of the persuasion source. Specifically, we aimed to identify the personality characteristics of the persuasive individual and test the moderating role of target and source involvement. In three studies we found support for hypothesized relationships between source persuasiveness and Extraversion, Neuroticism, and Openness to Experience, and evidence for a moderating effect of involvement. In a preliminary study (N = 66, Mage = 22.7, 64% female), we demonstrated expected differences in the personality ratings assigned to a hypothetical persuasive versus nonpersuasive individual. In Study 1 (N = 95, Mage = 24.1, 62% female), through sets of two-person debates, we showed that source Extraversion and Openness to Experience were positively, and Neuroticism negatively, associated with source persuasiveness. In Study 2 (N = 148, Mage = 24.3, 61% female), we manipulated the level of involvement and mostly replicated the results from Study 1, but, corresponding with our predictions, only when involvement was low. Our findings demonstrate the relevance of an interactionist approach to the study of persuasion, highlighting the role of personality in the study of the persuasion source.