Get access

Multiple Levels of Social Disadvantage and Links to Obesity in Adolescence and Young Adulthood

Authors


  • This research uses data from Add Health, a program project directed by K. M. H. and designed by J. Richard Udry, Peter S. Bearman, and K. M. H. at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and funded by grant P01-HD31921 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, with cooperative funding from 23 other federal agencies and foundations. Special acknowledgment is due Ronald R. Rindfuss and Barbara Entwisle for assistance in the original design. Information on how to obtain the Add Health data is available on the Add Health website (http://www.cpc.unc.edu/addhealth). The funding sources had no role in the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; or the decision to submit the article for publication.

Address correspondence to: Hedwig Lee, Assistant Professor, (hedylee@u.washington.edu), Department of Sociology, University of Washington, 211 Savery Hall, Box 353340, Seattle, WA 98195-3340.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

The rise in adolescent obesity has become a public health concern, especially because of its impact on disadvantaged youth. This article examines the role of disadvantage at the family-, peer-, school-, and neighborhood-level, to determine which contexts are related to obesity in adolescence and young adulthood.

METHODS

We analyzed longitudinal data from Waves I (1994-1995), II (1996), and III (2001-2002) of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, a nationally representative population-based sample of adolescents in grades 7-12 in 1995 who were followed into young adulthood. We assessed the relationship between obesity in adolescence and young adulthood, and disadvantage (measured by low parent education in adolescence) at the family-, peer-, school-, and neighborhood-level using multilevel logistic regression.

RESULTS

When all levels of disadvantage were modeled simultaneously, school-level disadvantage was significantly associated with obesity in adolescence for males and females and family-level disadvantage was significantly associated with obesity in young adulthood for females.

CONCLUSIONS

Schools may serve as a primary setting for obesity prevention efforts. Because obesity in adolescence tracks into adulthood, it is important to consider prevention efforts at this stage in the life course, in addition to early childhood, particularly among disadvantaged populations.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary