Neonatal exchange transfusions in the 21st century: A single hospital study

Authors

  • Helen Elizabeth Chitty,

    1. Department of Newborn Services, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Nina Ziegler,

    1. Department of Newborn Services, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Helen Savoia,

    1. Department of Haematology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Lex W Doyle,

    1. Department of Newborn Services, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    2. Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Lisa M Fox

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Newborn Services, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    • Correspondence: Dr Lisa M Fox, Neonatal Services, The Royal Women's Hospital, Locked Bag 300, Parkville, Vic. 3052, Australia. Fax: +61 3 83453588; email: helenchitty@doctors.org.uk

    Search for more papers by this author

  • Dr Helen Chitty now works at James Cook University Hospital Neonatal Unit, Middlesbrough, UK.
  • Conflict of interests: None.
  • Ethics approval: This audit was approved and endorsed by the Human Research and Ethics Committee at the Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne.
  • Funding: This study received no funding.

Abstract

Aim

In the 21st century, neonatal exchange transfusions (ETs) are uncommon procedures usually performed in tertiary neonatal units. As junior clinical staff now lack familiarity with the procedure, it is important to maintain awareness of its complications in order to manage clinical risks and counsel parents appropriately. The study aims to analyse the ET rate, its indications and its associated complications, in a single tertiary centre in the 21st century.

Methods

 This is a retrospective cohort study of all infants receiving ET from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2010 at the Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne.

Results

Sixty-four ETs were performed in 51 infants, an average of 6.4 ETs per year. Forty-nine (96%) infants were exchanged for hyperbilirubinaemia and two (4%) for anaemia. Thirty-six (71%) infants had Rhesus haemolytic disease of the newborn and six (12%) had ABO incompatibility. Six infants were intubated and mechanically ventilated after ET; these infants were significantly more acidotic during the ET than those who were never on respiratory support (mean pH 7.153 and 7.309 respectively, mean difference −0.156, 95% CI −0.196 to −0.116, t = 7.85, P < 0.001). Overall mortality was 8% (n = 4).

Conclusions

Our current ET rate is very low compared with historical data. It is difficult to ascribe mortality and morbidity directly to ET as the procedure is now often performed on smaller, sicker or more premature infants whose risks of mortality and morbidity are high regardless of ET. Prospective multi-centre studies are needed to provide adequate data to analyse complications in greater detail.

Ancillary