SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials And Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References

Objectives

To determine the computed tomographic stage of dogs with nasal tumours in a UK referral population, and whether stage, time to referral and treatment correlates with outcome.

Methods

Retrospective review of clinical records and computed tomography scans of dogs with nasal tumours.

Results

Dogs (n=78) presented to a referral practice in the UK with suspected nasal tumours are presented with more late stage tumours than dogs in the USA and Japan. Length of time from initial presentation to referral did not correlate with tumour stage at diagnosis. Median survival times for radiotherapy-treated dogs in this population are equivalent to those previously reported for late stage nasal tumours.

Clinical Significance

Dogs with nasal tumours are presented late in the course of disease in the North West of England. Dogs with clinical signs consistent with a nasal tumour should have timely imaging and biopsy, in order to make prompt treatment decisions. Although survival times are comparable with previous reports and radiotherapy is a valid treatment option for dogs with late stage disease, better outcomes are likely to be achievable with earlier treatment.


Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials And Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References

Nasal and paranasal tumours account for 1 to 2% of all canine tumours (Turek 2007). Fifty to seventy-five per cent of nasal/paranasal tumours are epithelial in origin, while most remaining tumours are sarcomas (Patnaik 1989, Adams et al. 2005, Turek 2007, Adams et al. 2009). Nasal tumours are locally invasive; systemic metastasis is infrequent, affecting 0 to 12% of dogs at presentation. Local lymph node involvement is reported in up to 24% of cases (Henry 1998, Rassnick et al. 2006, Buchholz 2009, Maruo et al. 2011).

Clinical signs of nasal tumours include nasal discharge, sneezing, stertor, epistaxis, facial pain and behavioural changes (Burk 1992, Tasker et al. 1999, Lefebvre et al. 2005, Rassnick et al. 2006, Turek 2007, Buchholz 2009, Kuehn 2009). Differential diagnoses include inflammatory rhinitis, aspergillosis and intranasal foreign bodies. The diagnosis of intranasal neoplasia is complicated by the difficulty in obtaining a representative biopsy and many neoplasms are initially diagnosed as inflammatory disease.

Computed tomography (CT) is the imaging modality of choice for diagnosing nasal neoplasia (Drees et al. 2009), although radiographs are often adequate (Gibbs et al. 1979, Morris et al. 1996). CT is superior for staging and also has some advantages over magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (including reduced cost to the client and shorter anaesthesia time for the patient) (Thrall et al. 1989, Saunders 2003, Drees et al. 2009). MRI is more sensitive for identifying intracranial involvement (Moore 1990). CT is required for radiotherapy treatment planning in most centres.

Several CT-based staging systems have been proposed for canine nasal tumours (Adams et al. 1998, Kondo et al. 2008, Adams et al. 2009). Most studies report an association between CT or radiographic stage at presentation with overall survival (Morris et al. 1996, Adams et al. 1998, Kondo et al. 2008, Adams et al. 2009), although this is controversial (LaDue et al. 1999, Mellanby et al. 2002, Lana et al. 2004).

The treatment of choice for canine nasal tumours is definitive radiotherapy, with reported median survival times of around 450 days (range, 428 to 474) (Henry 1998, Lana et al. 2004, Adams et al. 2005, Adams et al. 2009, Hunley et al. 2010). Reported median survival times for late stage tumours are 221 days (Henry 1998) to 315 days (Adams et al. 1998), and dogs with cribriform plate involvement have survival times in the region of 200 days (Kondo et al. 2008, Adams et al. 2009). The presence of local or distant metastasis has been associated with reduced survival times (Henry 1998).

All published work on the CT staging of canine nasal tumours has been from the USA, Japan and Switzerland. The purpose of this study was to assess the presentation of nasal tumours in a UK population using a previously reported CT staging system (Adams et al. 2009), and describe treatment outcomes. Late stage tumours were defined as stage 3 to 4 nasal tumours. It was hypothesized that UK dogs are frequently presented with late stage disease; that this negatively affected choice of treatment and clinical outcome and that time from initial presentation to diagnosis would correlate with tumour stage.

Materials And Methods

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials And Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References

The CT database of the Small Animal Teaching Hospital, University of Liverpool was searched for dogs having nasal CT and findings consistent with a nasal tumour (soft tissue opacity within the nasal cavity, turbinate or other bone destruction) between April 2007 and August 2011. Seventy-eight dogs met the criteria. Dogs with no or non-diagnostic biopsies were included if the CT report was consistent with neoplasia.

Medical records were reviewed and the following data was recorded: age, sex, breed, weight, time from initial presentation to the referring veterinary surgeon to referral, staging performed (thoracic CT or radiographs and local lymph node aspiration), presence of metastasis, biopsy result, tumour type, treatment, and time from diagnosis to death (survival time).

Transverse CT images of the head and thorax were acquired from rostral to caudal with the patient in sternal recumbency (Somatom Volume Zoom; Siemens). Postcontrast images were acquired using the same parameters following administration of 740 mgI/kg iopromide, intravenously (370 mgI/mL Ultravist 370; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc). Images were reconstructed using a soft tissue algorithm (3 mm slice thickness, 3 mm increment) and a bone algorithm (slice thickness (1·25 mm slice thickness, 1·2 mm increment). Images were viewed in transverse and multi-planar format in soft tissue (window level 50, window width 350) and bone (WL 700, WW 4000) windows using proprietary software (OsiriX v.4.1.1; Pixmeo).

One ACVR diplomate and one resident in diagnostic imaging were provided with case numbers and asked to review the CT scans and stage the tumour. Staging was by the modified Adams system (Table 1). In cases where there was disagreement between radiologists (22 cases), they re-reviewed the scan together and made a consensus decision on the tumour stage.

Table 1. Modified Adams CT staging system for canine nasal tumours (Adams et al 2009)
CT stageDescription
T1Tumour confined to one nasal passage with no bone involvement beyond turbinates
T2Any bone involvement beyond turbinates but with no evidence of orbit involvement or subcutaneous/submucosal mass
T3 (T3a)Orbit involved or subcutaneous/submucosal mass (Nasopharyngeal involvement)
T4Tumour causing lysis of the cribiform plate

Date and cause of death was obtained from patient records or telephone follow-up with referring veterinarians. Where the cause of death or reason for euthanasia was not known, it was assumed to be the nasal tumour. None of the dogs had postmortem examination. Survival time was calculated from the date of CT scan (date of diagnosis) to the date of death to allow comparison between treatment groups.

Treatment groups comprised: (1) No histological/cytological diagnosis-palliative medical care only (NSAIDs± antibiotic±additional analgesia). (2) Definitive diagnosis-palliative medical care (NSAIDS±antibiotic±additional analgesia. (3) Hypofractionated (palliative) radiotherapy and (4) Definitive radiotherapy. A single dog who received epirubicin/carboplatin was excluded from survival analysis. Dogs which received no treatment and/or where owners indicated that they planned to euthanase the dog imminently or elected for euthanasia at the time of diagnosis were grouped separately and excluded from survival analysis.

Median survival times for treated dogs were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival plots in a commercial package (SPSS 16.0 for Windows; SPSS Inc). Dogs still alive or lost to follow-up were right censored. Kruskall-Wallis test was used to assess significance of time from presentation to referral and log rank tests were used to determine significance of survival times between groups. Fisher's exact test was used to assess significance of tumour stage on treatment group. P<0.05 was used to set significance.

Hypofractionated (palliative) radiotherapy consisted of 4 weekly fractions of 9Gy. Definitive radiotherapy was defined as 12 fractions of 4Gy on a Monday, Wednesday, Friday basis. Patients were treated with a Dual Energy Linear Accelerator (Clinac 2100C; Varian). All treatments were carried out at 6MV, and were 3D planned from CT using Pinnacle (version 8; Phillips Healthcare NV), with the intent to include 95% of the planning treatment volume (planning treatment volume based on clinical target volume plus 0.5 cm, adjusting planned treatment volume margins manually in some cases to spare one eye or brain tissue) in the 95 to 105% isodose (i.e. scheduled dose heterogeneity <15%). Plans utilized three to seven beams, created using a Mark 2 series 80 leaf multi-leaf collimator. Patients were immobilized in a head immobilization device made up of a thermoplastic mask and a customized head support, which were then secured to a plastic base frame with four-point fixation (Kent et al. 2009). Portal imaging was carried out at the time of the first and at the time of the seventh fraction. Dogs having radiotherapy treatment also received non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications or glucocorticoids and antibiotics as determined by the attending clinician.

This study was carried out under the institution's ethical approval which did not permit contacting the owners of dogs involved in the study.

Results

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials And Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References

Tumour classification/distribution

Seventy-eight dogs had CT findings consistent with a nasal tumour; in 60 cases a histological (58) or cytological (2) diagnosis was achieved. Of 18 dogs without a definitive diagnosis, 12 had biopsies which were non-diagnostic and owners declined a repeat procedure, and 6 dogs did not have biopsies performed due to the owner's decision not to proceed with treatment. Tumour types are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2. Biopsy and cytology results in 72 dogs with suspected nasal tumours (in six cases the owners declined biopsy)
Histopathological/cytological diagnosisNumber of dogsHistopathological/cytological diagnosisNumber of dogs
Carcinomas42Sarcomas17
Adenocarcinoma (1 cytological)13Myxosarcoma1
Anaplastic adenocarcinoma1Sarcoma4
Carcinoma16Poorly differentiated/undifferentiated sarcoma2
Transitional cell carcinoma4Chondrosarcoma9
Undifferentiated/poorly differentiated carcinoma2Mesenchymal tumour (cytological)1
High grade carcinoma1Other13
Squamous cell carcinoma3Anaplastic neoplasia1
Basosquamous carcinoma1Non-diagnostic/inflammation12
Adenoma1  

Signalment

There were 37 female neutered, 21 male neutered and 20 entire male dogs. Breeds represented included: crossbreed (n=17), Labrador/retriever (n=13), spaniel breeds (n=12) collie/collie-cross (n=5), West Highland white terrier (n = 4), Staffordshire bull terrier (n=3), German shepherd dog (n=3), Rottweiler (n=3), Border terrier (n=2) and English bull terrier (n=2). Fourteen breeds were each represented by one dog. Median age at presentation was nine years (range, 2.5 to 15 years). Weight was recorded for 77/78 dogs and median weight was 23 kg (range, 5.3 to 52 kg).

Time to referral

Time from presentation to the referring veterinarian to referral was recorded in 64 of 78 dogs and median time to referral for all dogs was 52 days (range, 1 to 430 days). The median time from initial presentation to referral was 41.5 days (range, 1 to 149 days) for stage 2 dogs, 38 days (range, 1 to 330 days) for stage 3/3a dogs and 53.5 days (range, 6 to 430 days) for stage 4 dogs. There were no significant differences between groups.

CT findings

Thirty-eight tumours were predominantly right sided, 35 were left sided and in five cases it was not possible to determine from which side the tumour originated (bilateral).

Two dogs were excluded from CT staging as they had prior debulking surgery. No dogs were classified as CT stage 1, 10 of 76 (13%) were classified as CT stage 2, 3 (4%) as stage 3, 18 (24%) as stage 3a and 45 (59%) as stage 4. Thus 66 of 76 dogs (87%) were CT stage 3, 3a or 4.

Staging

Local lymph node aspiration (mandibular lymph node) was performed and results recorded in 29 of 78 dogs (4 positive for metastatic disease, 24 negative and one non-diagnostic). Aspiration was not performed in 18 of 78 dogs. In 31 of 78 cases the medical record was not complete with regards to whether lymph node aspiration was performed.

Full staging (thoracic radiographs/thoracic CT with local lymph node aspiration) was performed and recorded in 29 dogs. Thirty-nine dogs had thoracic CT/radiographs without lymph node aspiration being recorded/performed. In 10 dogs thoracic staging was not performed. Of the 68 of 78 dogs having thoracic imaging, 9 had radiographs, 58 had CT and 1 dog had both radiographs and CT performed.

Seven of sixty-eight (10·2%) dogs had CT evidence of thoracic metastasis documented; three dogs had single pulmonary nodules and four dogs had multiple pulmonary nodules. None of the dogs having thoracic radiographs had radiographic evidence of metastasis documented. Four of the twenty-nine (13·7%) dogs had documented local lymph node metastasis.

Treatment and survival times

One dog died of acute epistaxis following biopsy and was included in the no treatment group (13 dogs). Twelve dogs received no treatment and were euthanased at or very soon after diagnosis (within 2 weeks except for three dogs euthanased at 21, 26 and 114 days after diagnosis; in these three cases owners indicated their intention to euthanase the dog immediately and declined any therapy). The six dogs in this group with no biopsy all had late stage tumours (5 stage 4 and 1 stage 3a).

Overall median survival time for all treated dogs was 210 days (95% CI: 120 to 299) regardless of stage or treatment. Median survival time for all stage 2 dogs was 392 days (30 to 639; 95% CI: 193 to 591), stage 3/3a dogs 262 days (55 to 1077; 95% CI: 0 to 1038) and stage 4 dogs 132 days (14 to 809; 95% CI: 94 to 170) (Fig 1). There were no significant differences between groups.

image

Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier Curve showing survival times for 76 dogs with nasal tumours (CT stage 2, 3/3a and 4). Right censored dogs are shown by cross marks, the dotted line represents stage 2 dogs, the dashed line represents stage 3/3a dogs and the solid line represents stage 4 dogs

Download figure to PowerPoint

Median survival time for 12 of 78 dogs receiving palliative medical treatment without a histopathological/cytological diagnosis was 106 days (range: 55 to 1077 days; 95% CI: 0 to 245), and 1 dog was lost to follow-up in this group. One dog was still alive at 1077 days. Median survival time for 26 of 78 dogs with histological/cytological diagnosis (five sarcomas and 21 carcinomas) receiving palliative medical treatment was 114 days (range: 14 to 507; 95% CI: 14 to 507). Two dogs were lost to follow-up and one dog was still alive at 162 days in this group. All dogs received non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and referring veterinarians prescribed antibiotics and additional analgesia as required. The three dogs were lost to follow-up immediately after discharge. One dog (stage 4) not included in the group received chemotherapy (epirubicin and carboplatin) and survived for 134 days.

Median time from diagnosis to first definitive radiotherapy treatment was 10 days (range: 3 to 60). Median time from diagnosis to first palliative radiation treatment was 54 days (range: 12 to 128).

All dogs having treatment with radiotherapy had a histopathological diagnosis of a nasal tumour and negative local lymph node aspiration for metastasis. Four of 78 (5%) dogs received a hypofractionated radiotherapy protocol (one sarcoma and three carcinomas) and had a median survival time of 174 days (range: 122 to 238; 95% CI: 109 to 239). All these dogs had late stage tumours; three stage 4 and one stage 3a.

Twenty-two of 78 (28%) dogs received definitive radiotherapy (nine sarcomas and 13 carcinomas) and had an overall median survival time of 427 days (range: 115 to 892; 95% CI: 206 to 1071). Nine of these dogs were stage 4 and median survival for 8 stage 4 dogs was 272 days (range: 115 to 809). One stage 4 dog was lost to follow-up at 420 days. Two other dogs (stage 2 and stage 3a) were lost to follow-up at 78 and 177 days. Six dogs were still alive; one stage 2 dog (425 days) and five stage 3a dogs (158, 265, 675, 682 and 728 days) (Fig 2).

image

Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier Curve for 39 dogs with nasal tumours treated with palliative medical treatment, 4 with palliative radiotherapy and 22 with definitive radiotherapy. Right censored dogs are shown by cross marks, the dotted line represents dogs treated with palliative medical treatments (unknown diagnosis), the dashed and dotted line represents dogs treated medically (diagnosed nasal tumour) the dashed lines represent dogs who received hypofractionated and definitive RT

Download figure to PowerPoint

The group of dogs receiving definitive radiotherapy was made up of 18% stage 2 dogs, 32% stage 3/3a dogs and 41% stage 4 dogs. Only 28% of dogs with stage 3/3a tumours and 20% of dogs with stage 4 tumours had definitive treatment (Table 3). Of the four dogs receiving palliative radiation therapy three had stage 4 tumours and one had a stage 3 tumour. Four of ten dogs with stage 2 nasal tumours received definitive therapy compared with 16 of 66 dogs with late stage tumours (P=0.44).

Table 3. Treatment groups
TreatmentNumber of dogsCT stage 2CT stage 3/3aCT stage 4Prior debulking
None12(+1 died)1390
Medical (no diagnosis)121560
Medical (definitive diagnosis)2645170
Chemotherapy10010
Hypofractionated RT40130
Definitive RT (dRT)224792
Percentage of group having dRT (%) 403320100

Discussion

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials And Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References

These results confirm that dogs with nasal tumours in this UK population are commonly presented late in the disease course. Sixty-six of 76 (87%) dogs were classified as CT stage 3 to 4 (late stage) with 45 (59%) in CT stage 4. Previous studies of dogs receiving definitive radiotherapy or medical palliation reported late stage tumours in 48 to 61% of the population, with stage 4 dogs making up 32 to 38% of the population (Adams et al. 1998, Rassnick et al. 2006, Adams et al. 2009). While the distribution of tumour stage in these previous studies may reflect the fact that dogs with lower stage disease are more likely to receive definitive treatment, two populations of dogs treated palliatively also had fewer late stage tumours than the current population (Rassnick et al. 2006, Gieger et al. 2008). Two studies of dogs receiving hypofractionated radiation protocols showed that 79 to 81% of treated dogs presented with late stage tumours (Buchholz 2009, Maruo et al. 2011); however, these treatment groups do not represent the entire presented population of dogs as hypofractionated protocols are commonly recommended for dogs with late stage tumours. Owner constraints may also influence the decision to pursue hypofractionated versus definitive radiotherapy treatment (Gieger et al. 2008), although this should be equal across groups in this study.

No attempt was made to correlate the time clinical signs were present with the tumour stage at presentation, due to inconsistencies in record-keeping. On review of the records it was found that when recorded, information given to the referring veterinarian often differed from that given to the referral clinician. As owners’ recollections of events could not be retrospectively confirmed, instead, the time from first visit to the referring veterinarian to referral was calculated and the median time for all dogs was 52 days, which is similar to or less than previous studies (Mellanby et al. 2002, Rassnick et al. 2006, Maruo et al. 2011). Late presentation and late referral may both contribute to advanced tumour stage at diagnosis. Future studies are required to try to establish the length of time clinical signs are present before presentation of dogs with nasal tumours, and the significance of this on tumour stage at presentation and outcome with treatment.

Dogs with non-diagnostic biopsies (12) were included in the survival data for medically treated patients, provided they met the CT criteria for consistent with neoplasia, as a study objective was to report CT stage. Patients without biopsy (6) were also included, as these tended to be patients where the client had decided against radiotherapy before the CT scan should the findings be highly suggestive of tumour. Previous studies have shown good correlation between CT findings and histopathology consistent with neoplasia (Burk 1992). Exclusion of these cases would have biased the population, particularly as cases without biopsy were frequently those with advanced CT findings and significant clinical signs. The population with non-diagnostic biopsy had CT staging similar to the overall population (one stage 2, five stage 3a and six stage 4), and survival time was not significantly different between medically managed dogs with a definitive diagnosis versus dogs without diagnosis.

It is widely accepted that nasal biopsies can be non-diagnostic in nasal neoplasia [12 of 72 (17%) in this study] due to local inflammation surrounding the tumour (Meler et al. 2008). Repeat biopsy procedures are often needed to obtain a diagnosis (Withrow et al. 1985). Dogs with non-diagnostic biopsies did not undergo repeat sampling as their owners had elected not to pursue radiotherapy treatment. It is unlikely that dogs with severe inflammatory rhinitis could have inadvertently been included in the analysis given the different CT findings in cases of inflammatory rhinitis from nasal neoplasia (Adams et al. 1998, Henry 1998, LaDue et al. 1999, Mellanby et al. 2002, Yoon et al. 2008, Adams et al. 2009, Hunley et al. 2010, Bommarito et al. 2011, Maruo et al. 2011).

Reported rates of lymph node metastasis at diagnosis range from 6 to 24% (Henry 1998, LaDue et al. 1999, Rassnick et al. 2006). The finding of 13·7% local lymph node metastasis is consistent with previous reports, but only 29 dogs had FNA procedures documented, and the actual rate could be higher. Many dogs in this study did not have local lymph node aspiration performed or this data was not included on the clinical record. In some cases, this was due to owners’ preference; if they elected palliative care only, then this procedure would not have changed the outcome. In other cases, lymph nodes would have been aspirated (as hospital protocol is for all dogs undergoing radiotherapy to have this performed), but a change in the clinical database in 2008 did not consistently archive this information. As metastasis has been shown to negatively affect outcomes and may affect an owner's decision to proceed with radiotherapy treatment, this procedure should be carried out routinely. Pulmonary lesions consistent with distant metastases were present in 7 of 67 (10·4%) dogs which is slightly higher than previous reports (Henry 1998, Rassnick et al. 2006) and may reflect the increased sensitivity for CT over radiography in diagnosis of metastatic disease (Nemanic et al. 2006, Eberle et al. 2011). However, as none of the lesions were cytologically confirmed it is possible that single nodules could represent another disease process.

Median survival times were comparable with those previously reported, despite the late presentation. This is encouraging given that previous patient groups generally had less extensive disease. The previously reported median survival times of around 200 days in stage 4 tumours (Adams et al. 1998, Adams et al. 2009) may influence clients choosing medical palliation over radiotherapy treatment. The study median survival of 427 days for all dogs and 274 days for dogs with cribriform plate involvement treated with radiotherapy is encouraging, and suggests that it is worth pursuing treatment in these patients as good individual outcomes are possible. No attempt was made to attach statistical significance to these figures as the groups were small and further studies with larger numbers of definitively treated patients are required.

Interestingly, three of the six RT dogs alive at the time of analysis had already survived beyond the median. These were all stage 3a dogs, and a sub-set of stage 3a dogs has been reported as having extended survivals in a previous study (Adams et al. 2009). A small number of dogs treated with palliative medical therapy also lived for a long time, which is consistent with a previous study (Rassnick et al. 2006). The longest surviving medically managed dog was also CT stage 3a, suggesting that dogs with this tumour stage may have more tolerable clinical signs than dogs with tumours in other stages. Larger studies on dogs with stage 3a nasal tumours would further quantify this finding.

One dog in this study received chemotherapy as the owners declined radiation therapy due to thoracic metastasis. Whilst it is widely documented that chemotherapy is ineffective in the face of gross disease, there are two small studies on the use of chemotherapy for treatment of canine nasal tumours in which a response was documented in some dogs (Hahn et al. 1992, Langova et al. 2004).

Our median survival times of 114 days with medical palliation and 174 days for hypofractionated radiotherapy protocols were also comparable with previous studies (Mellanby et al. 2002, Buchholz 2009, Maruo et al. 2011). Hypofractionated radiotherapy may be recommended to owners of dogs with late stage tumours due to the perception that outcomes with definitive therapy may be poor and therefore protocols with lesser acute radiation side effects are more appropriate. The decision to pursue this protocol may also be due to financial or logistic considerations.

Our data shows that the group of dogs having definitive radiotherapy was not dissimilar to the group as a whole, but overall dogs with late stage tumours were less likely to have any treatment. This may reflect owners reluctance to pursue treatment if the tumour is extensive or clinicians bias in recommending treatment given previously reported survival times being worse for dogs with late stage tumours.

The reason for the higher number of dogs presenting with stage 4 disease compared to previous studies is not clear and may reflect geographic differences in owners’ attitudes to seeking treatment for clinical signs such as sneezing, snoring, nasal discharge or epistaxis. It may also reflect a failure of veterinary surgeons to diagnose nasal tumours promptly, although a difference between groups in the median time from presentation to referral was not detected, numbers were small and most of the dogs had late stage disease. A small number of dogs in this study (6 of 64) were referred 5 months or more after initial presentation, all of which had late stage tumours at diagnosis.

In conclusion, dogs in this UK referral population were presented with a higher than previously reported prevalence of advanced stage nasal tumours. Despite this, median survival time of this population dogs with cribriform plate involvement was better than previously reported survival times. A few dogs with stage 3a disease had prolonged survival times. Time from first presentation to referral did not correlate with late stage at presentation, but dogs referred late in the course of disease (more than 5 months after first seeing the referring veterinarian) all had late stage tumours. While a significant number of dogs with late stage tumours had definitive radiotherapy, treatment was pursued less often in dogs with late stage tumours than in dogs with early stage disease, and while numbers are small, none of the dogs with stage 2 tumours received palliative radiation therapy.

Veterinary surgeons and owners should be aware of the clinical signs associated with nasal neoplasia and pursue diagnosis early in the course of the disease. Radiotherapy is the treatment of choice and dogs with nasal tumours should be referred to a radiation oncologist to discuss treatment as good outcomes can be achieved, even with late stage tumours.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors of this article has a financial or personal relationship with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of this paper.

Acknowledgements

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials And Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References

We would like to acknowledge Tracy Graham for assistance with the radiotherapy data, all the clinicians and nurses involved in the investigation and care of the dogs in this study, and the vets who referred the cases. The primary author's residency is part funded by BSAVA Petsavers.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials And Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References
  • Adams, W. M., Miller, P. E., Vail, D. M., et al. (1998) An accelerated technique for irradiation of malignant canine nasal and paranasal sinus tumors. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound 39, 475481
  • Adams, W. M., Bjorling, D. E., McAnulty, J. E., et al. (2005) Outcome of accelerated radiotherapy alone or accelerated radiotherapy followed by exenteration of the nasal cavity in dogs with intranasal neoplasia: 53 cases (1990–2002). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 227, 936941
  • Adams, W. M., Kleiter, M. M., Thrall, D. E., et al. (2009) Prognostic significance of tumor histology and computed tomographic staging for radiation treatment response of canine nasal tumors. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound 50, 330335
  • Bommarito, D. A., Kent, M. S., Selting, K. A., et al. (2011) Reirradiation of recurrent canine nasal tumors. Veterinary radiology and ultrasound 52, 207212
  • Buchholz, J., Hagen, R., Leo, C., et al. (2009) 3D conformal radiation therapy for palliative treatment of canine nasal tumours. Veterinary radiology and ultrasound 50, 679683
  • Burk, R. L. (1992) Computed tomographic imaging of nasal disease in 100 dogs. Veterinary radiology and ultrasound 33, 177180
  • Drees, R., Forrest, L. J. & Chappell, R. (2009) Comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of canine intranasal neoplasia. Journal of Small Animal Practice 50, 334340
  • Eberle, N., Fork, M., von Babo, V., et al. (2011) Comparison of examination of thoracic radiographs and thoracic computed tomography in dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma. Veterinary and Comparative Oncology 9, 131140
  • Gibbs, C., Lane, J. G. & Denny, H. R. (1979) Radiological features of intra-nasal lesions in the dog: a review of 100 cases. Journal of Small Animal Practice 20, 515535
  • Gieger, T., Rassnick, K., Siegal, S., Proulx, D., Bergman, P., Anderson, C., LaDue,T., Smith, A., Northrup, N. & Roberts, R. (2008) Palliation of clinical signs in 48 dogs with nasal carcinomas treated with coarse-fraction radiation therapy. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 44, 116123
  • Hahn, K. A., Knapp, D. W., Richardson, R. C., et al. (1992) Clinical-response of nasal adenocarcinoma to cisplatin chemotherapy in 11 dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 200, 355357
  • Henry, C. J. (1998) Survival in dogs with nasal adenocarcinoma: 64 cases (1981–1995). Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 12, 436439
  • Hunley, D. W. M., G. N. , Shiomitsu, K. & Mauldin, G. E. (2010) Clinical outcome in dogs with nasal tumours treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Canadian Veterinary Journal 51, 293300
  • Kent, M., Gorgon, I.K., Benavides, I., Primas, P. & Young, J. (2009) Assessment of the accuracy and precision of a patient immobilization device for radiation therapy in canine head and neck tumors. Veterinary radiology and ultrasound 50, 550554
  • Kondo, Y., Matsunaga, S., Mochizuki, M., et al. (2008) Prognosis of canine patients with nasal tumors according to modified clinical stages based on computed tomography: a retrospective study. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 70, 207212
  • Kuehn, N. F. (2009) Rhinitis in the dog. In: Respiratory Diseases 14th edn. Ed E. C. Hawkins. Saunders Elsevier, St. Louis, MO, USA. pp 609616
  • LaDue, T. A., Dodge, R., Page, R. L., et al. (1999) Factors influencing survival after radiotherapy of nasal tumors in 130 dogs. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound 40, 312317
  • Lana, S. E., Dernell, W. S., Lafferty, M. H., et al. (2004) Use of radiation and a slow-release cisplatin formulation for treatment of canine nasal tumors. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound 45, 577581
  • Langova, V., Mutsaers, A. J., Phillips, B., et al. (2004) Treatment of eight dogs with nasal tumours with a alternating doses of doxorubicin and carboplatin in conjunction with oral piroxicam. Australian Veterinary Journal 82, 676680
  • Lefebvre, J., Kuehn, N. F. & Wortinger, A. (2005) Computed tomography as an aid in the diagnosis of chronic nasal disease in dogs. The Journal of Small Animal Practice 46, 280285
  • Maruo, T., Shida, T., Fukuyama, Y., et al. (2011) Retrospective study of canine nasal tumor treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 73, 193197
  • Meler, E., Dunn, M. & Lecuyer, M. (2008) A retrospective study of canine persistent nasal disease: 80 cases (1998–2003). Canadian Veterinary Journal 49, 7176
  • Mellanby, R. J., Stevenson, R. K., Herrtage, M. E., et al. (2002) Long-term outcome of 56 dogs with nasal tumours treated with four doses of radiation at intervals of seven days. Veterinary Record 151, 253257
  • Moore, M. P., Gavin, P. R., Kraft, S. L., et al. (1990) MR, CT and clinical features from four dogs with nasal tumours involving the rostral cerebrum. Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound 32, 1925
  • Morris, J. S., Dunn, K. J., Dobson, J. M., et al. (1996) Radiological assessment of severity of canine nasal tumours and relationship with survival. Journal of Small Animal Practice 37, 16
  • Nemanic, S., London, C. A. & Wisner, E. R. (2006) Comparison of thoracic radiographs and single breath-hold helical CT for detection of pulmonary nodules in dogs with metastatic neoplasia. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 20, 508515
  • Patnaik, A. K. (1989) Canine sinonasal neoplasms clinicopathological study of 285 cases. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 25, 103113
  • Rassnick, K. M., Goldkamp, C. E., Erb, H. N., et al. (2006) Evaluation of factors associated with survival in dogs with untreated nasal carcinomas: 139 cases (1993–2003). Javma-Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 229, 401406
  • Saunders. (2003) Diagnostic value of computed tomography in dogs with chronic nasal disease. Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound 44, 409413
  • Tasker, S., Knottenbelt, C. M., Munro, E. A., et al. (1999) Aetiology and diagnosis of persistent nasal disease in the dog: a retrospective study of 42 cases. The Journal of Small Animal Practice 40, 473478
  • Thrall, D. E., Robertson, I. D., McLeod, D. A., et al. (1989) A comparison of radiographic and computed tomographic findings in 31 dogs with malignant nasal cavity tumors. Veterinary Radiology 30, 5966
  • Turek, M. M., Lana, S. E. (2007) Canine nasosinal tumours. In: Withrow & MacEwen's Small Animal Clinical Oncology. 4th edn. Eds S. J. Withrow and D. M. Vail. Saunders Elsevier, St. Louis, MO, USA. pp 525535
  • Withrow, S. J., Susaneck, S. J., Macy, D. W. & Sheetz, J. (1985) Aspiration and punch biopsy techniques for nasal tumors. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 21, 551554
  • Yoon, J. H., Feeney, D. A., Jessen, C. R., et al. (2008) External-beam Co-60 radiotherapy for canine nasal tumors: A comparison of survival by treatment protocol. Research in Veterinary Science 84, 140149