SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Akanle, O., & Zhang, D. (2008). Agent-based model for optimising supply-chain configurations. International Journal of Production Economics, 115 (2), 444460.
  • Akkermans, H., & Dellaert, N. (2005). The rediscovery of industrial dynamics: The contribution of system dynamics to supply chain management in a dynamic and fragmented world. System Dynamics Review, 21 (3), 173186.
  • Andersson-Cederholm, E., & Gyimóthy, S. (2010). The service triad: Modelling dialectic tensions in service encounters. Service Industries Journal, 30 (2), 265280.
  • Axelrod, R. (1997). The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Barney, J. B. (1991a). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99120.
  • Barney, J. B. (1991b). The resource based view of strategy: Origins, implications, and prospects. Editor of Special Theory Forum in Journal of Management, 17, 97211.
  • Barney, J. B. (2012). Purchasing, supply chain management and sustained competitive advantage: The relevance of resource-based theory. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48 (2), 36.
  • Barratt, M., Choi, T. Y., & Li, M. (2011). Qualitative case studies in operations management: Trends, research outcomes, and future research implications. Journal of Operations Management, 29 (4), 329342.
  • Borgatti, S. P., & Li, X. (2009). On social network analysis in a supply chain context. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45 (2), 521.
  • Bowen, F. E., Cousins, P. D., Lamming, R. C., & Faruk, A. C. (2001). The role of supply management capabilities in green supply. Production and Operations Management, 10 (2), 174189.
  • Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1996). Co-Opetition. New York: Doubleday.
  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Burt, R. S. (2000). The Network Structure of Social Capital. In R. I. Sutton & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 345423). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Carson, P. P., Carson, K. D., Knouse, S. B., & Roe, C. W. (1997). Balance theory applied to service quality: A focus on the organization, provider, and consumer triad. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12 (2), 99120.
  • Choi, T. Y. (2007). Supplier-supplier relationships why they matter. Supply Chain Management Review, 11 (5), 5156.
  • Choi, T. Y., Dooley, K. J., & Rungtusanatham, M. (2001). Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence. Journal of Operations Management, 19 (3), 351366.
  • Choi, T. Y., & Hong, Y. (2002). Unveiling the structure of supply networks: Case studies in Honda, Acura, and DaimlerChrysler. Journal of Operations Management, 20 (5), 469493.
  • Choi, T. Y., & Krause, D. R. (2006). The supply base and its complexity: Implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 24 (5), 637652.
  • Choi, T. Y., & Linton, T. (2011, December). Don't let your supply chain control your business. Harvard Business Review, 89 (12), 112117.
  • Choi, T. Y., & Wu, Z. (2009a). Taking the leap from dyads to triads: Buyer-supplier relationships in supply networks. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 15, 263266.
  • Choi, T. Y., & Wu, Z. (2009b). Triads in supply networks: Theorizing buyer–supplier–supplier relationships. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45 (1), 825.
  • Choi, T. Y., Wu, Z., Ellram, L. M., & Koka, B. R. (2002). Supplier-supplier relationships and their implications for buyer-supplier relationships. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49 (2), 119130.
  • Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management, 15 (2), 114.
  • Closs, D. J., Jacobs, M. A., Swink, M., & Webb, G. S. (2008). Toward a theory of competencies for the management of product complexity: Six case studies. Journal of Operations Management, 26, 590610.
  • Cox, A., Sanderson, J., & Watson, G. (2001, Spring). Supply chains and power regimes: Toward and analytic framework for managing extended networks of buyer and supplier relationships. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 37 (2), 2835.
  • Cox, A., Watson, G., Lonsdale, C., & Sanderson, J. (2004). Managing appropriately in power regimes: Relationship and performance management in 12 supply chain cases. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9 (5), 357371.
  • Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23 (4), 660679.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), 532550.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Galunic, D. C. (2000). Coevolving: At last, a way to make synergies work. Harvard Business Review, 78 (1), 91102.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1), 2532.
  • Ellram, L. M. (1996). An application of the case study method in logistics research. The Journal of Business Logistics, 17 (2), 93138.
  • Forrester, J. W. (1958). Industrial dynamics, a major breakthrough for decision makers. Harvard Business Review, 36 (4), 3766.
  • Galaskiewicz, J. (2011). Studying supply chains from a social network perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47 (1), 48.
  • Ge, Y., Yang, J. B., Proudlove, N., & Spring, M. (2004). System dynamics modelling for supply-chain management: A case study on a supermarket chain in the UK. International Transactions in Operational Research, 11 (5), 495509.
  • Gelderman, C. (1989). Henry Ford: The wayward capitalist. New York: St. Martins Press.
  • Grant, R. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109122.
  • Grant, R. (1997). The knowledge-based view of the firm: Implications for management practice. Long Range Planning, 30 (3), 450454.
  • Håkansson, H., & Persson, G. (2004). Supply chain management: The logic of supply chains and networks. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 15 (1), 1126.
  • Halinen, A., Salmi, A., & Havila, V. (1999). From dyadic change to changing business networks: An analytical framework. Journal of Management Studies, 36 (6), 779794.
  • Harland, C., Knight, L., Lamming, R. C., & Walker, H. (2005). Outsourcing: Assessing the risks and benefits for organisations, sectors and nations. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25 (9), 831850.
  • Havila, V., Johanson, J., & Thilenius, P. (2004). International business-relationship triads. International Marketing Review, 21 (2), 172186.
  • Hingley, M. (2005a). Power to all our friends? Industrial Marketing Management, 34 (8), 848858.
  • Hingley, M. (2005b). Power imbalance in UK agri-food supply chains. Journal of Marketing Management, 21 (1/2), 6368.
  • Kaufmann, L., & Denk, N. (2011). How to demonstrate rigor when presenting grounded theory research in the supply chain management literature. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47 (4), 6472.
  • Kellen, V., & Stefanczyk, K. (2002). Complexity, fragmentation, uncertainty, and emergence in customer relationship management. Management, 4 (4), 3950.
  • Kim, Y., Choi, T., Yan, T., & Dooley, K. (2011). Investigation of supply networks: A social network analysis approach. Journal of Operations Management, 29, 194211.
  • Lamming, R., & Hampson, J. (1996). The environment as a supply chain management issue. British Journal of Management, 7 (s1), S45S62.
  • Lamming, R., Johnsen, T., Zheng, J., & Harland, C. (2000). An initial classification of supply networks. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20 (5), 675691.
  • Li, M., & Choi, T. Y. (2009). Triads in services outsourcing: Bridge, bridge decay and bridge transfer. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45 (3), 2739.
  • Li, J., Sheng, Z., & Liu, H. (2010). Multi-agent simulation for the dominant players' behavior in supply chains. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 18 (6), 850859.
  • Li, G., Sun, L., Gu, Y., & Dong, Y. (2007). Self-organisation evolution of supply networks. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 10 (2/3), 142160.
  • Madhavan, R., Gnyawali, D. R., & He, J. (2004). Two's company, three's a crowd? Triads in cooperative-competitive networks. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (6), 918927.
  • Matos, S., & Hall, J. (2007). Integrating sustainable development in the supply chain: The case of life cycle assessment in oil and gas and agricultural biotechnology. Journal of Operations Management, 25 (6), 10831102.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Pagell, M., Wu, Z., & Wasserman, M. (2010). Thinking differently about purchasing portfolios: An assessment of sustainable sourcing. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46 (1), 5773.
  • Pathak, S. D., Day, J. M., Nair, A., Sawaya, W. J., & Kristal, M. M. (2007). Complexity and adaptivity in supply networks: Building supply network theory using a complex adaptive systems perspective. Decision Sciences, 38 (4), 547571.
  • Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Peng, T. A., Lin, N., Martinez, V., & Yu, C. J. (2010). Managing triads in a military avionics service maintenance network in Taiwan. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 30 (4), 398422.
  • Phillips, J., Liu, B. S., & Costello, T. G. (1998). A balance theory of perspective of triadic supply chain relationships. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 6 (4), 7891.
  • Priem, R. L., & Swink, M. (2012). A demand-side perspective on supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48 (2), 713.
  • Rossetti, C., & Choi, T. Y. (2005). On the dark side of strategic sourcing: Experiences from the aerospace industry. Academy of Management Executive, 19 (1), 4660.
  • Rossetti, C., & Choi, T. Y. (2008). Supply management under high goal incongruence: An empirical examination of disintermediation in the aerospace supply chain. Decision Sciences, 39 (3), 507540.
  • Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22, 887910.
  • Sanders, N. R., Locke, A., Moore, C. B., & Autry, C. W. (2007). A multidimensional framework for understanding outsourcing arrangements. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 43 (4), 315.
  • Seuring, S. (2004). Industrial ecology, life cycles, supply chains: Differences and interrelations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13 (5), 306319.
  • Simmel, G. (1950). The triad. In K. H. Wolff (Ed.), The sociology of George Simmel. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  • Skilton, P. F., & Robinson, J. L. (2009). Traceability and normal accident theory: How does supply network complexity influence the traceability of adverse events? Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45 (3), 4053.
  • Stallkamp, T. S. (2005). A better way to do business: Moving from conflict to collaboration. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.
  • Sterman, J. D. (1988). Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Science, 35 (3), 321339.
  • Sterman, J. D. (1992, October). Teaching takes off: Flight simulators for management education. OR/MS Today, 20 (5), 4044.
  • Tate, W., & Ellram, L. (2006). Services spent management: Outsourcing/offshoring your services spent. CAPS Focused Benchmarking Report, CAPS Research.
  • Thron, T., Gábor, N., & Niaz, W. (2007). Evaluating alternative supply chain structures for perishable products. International Journal of Logistics Management, 18 (3), 364384.
  • Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (4), 464476.
  • van der Vorst, J. G. A. J., Beulens, A. J. M., & van Beek, P. (2000). Modelling and simulating multi-echelon food systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 122 (2), 354366.
  • van der Vorst, J. G. A. J., & van der Zee, D.-J. (2010). Simulation modelling for food supply chain redesign. In C. Mena & G. Stevens (Eds.), Delivering performance in food supply chains (pp. 387415). Oxford: Woodhead Publishing Ltd.
  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5 (4), 171180.
  • Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.
  • Williamson, O. E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Williamson, O. E. (2008). Outsourcing: Transaction cost economics and supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44 (2), 516.
  • Wu, Z., & Choi, T. Y. (2005). Supplier–supplier relationships in the buyer-supplier triad: Building theories from eight case studies. Journal of Operations Management, 24 (1), 2752.
  • Wu, Z., Choi, T. Y., & Rungtusanatham, M. J. (2010). Supplier-supplier relationships in buyer-supplier-supplier triads: Implications for supplier performance. Journal of Operations Management, 28 (2), 115123.
  • Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
  • Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. G. (2005). Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (9), 809825.
  • Zsidisin, G. A., Panelli, A., & Upton, R. (2000). Purchasing organization involvement in risk assessments, contingency plans, and risk management: An exploratory study. Supply Chain Management, 5 (4), 187205.