SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Agyris, J. G. (1968). Some Unintended Consequences of Rigorous Research. Psychological Bulletin, 70 (September), 185197.
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), 179212.
  • Allen, C. T. (2004). A Theory-Based Approach for Improving Demand Artifact Assessment in Advertising Experiments. Journal of Advertising, 33 (2), 6373.
  • Antia, K. D., Bergen, M. E., Dutta, S., & Fisher, R. J. (2006). How Does Enforce Deter Gray Market Incidence. Journal of Marketing, 70 (1), 92106.
  • Atkins, T. S., & Rinehart, L. M. (2006). The Effect of Negotiation Practices on the Relationship between Suppliers and Customers. Negotiation Journal, 22 (3), 4765.
  • Bachrach, D. G., & Bendoly, E. (2011). Rigor in Behavioral Experiments: A Basic Primer for Supply Chain Management Researchers. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47 (3), 58.
  • Beatty, S. E., & Ferrell, M. E. (1998). Impulse Buying: Modeling its Precursors. Journal of Retailing, 74 (2), 169191.
  • Bottom, W. P., Holloway, J., Miller, G. J., Mislin, A., & Whitford, A. (2006). Building a Pathway to Cooperation: Negotiation and Social Exchange Between Principal and Agent. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(March), 2958.
  • Bowles, H. R., & Flynn, F. (2010). Gender and Persistence in Negotiation: A Dyadic Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 53 (4), 769787.
  • Boyer, K. K., & Swink, M. L. (2008). Empirical Elephants—Why Multiple Methods are Essential to Quality Research in Operations and Supply Chain Management. Journal of Operations Management, 26 (3), 338344.
  • Buchan, N. R., Croson, R. T. A., & Johnson, E. J. (2004). When Do Fair Beliefs influence Bargaining Behavior? Experimental Bargaining in Japan and the United States. Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (1), 181190.
  • Buelens, M., van de Woestyne, M., Mestdagh, S., & Bouckenooghe, D. (2008). Methodological Issues in Negotiation Research: A State-of-the-Art Review. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17 (4), 321345.
  • Cahill, D. L., Goldsby, T. J., Knemeyer, A. M., & Wallenburg, C. M. (2010). Customer Loyalty in Logistics Outsourcing Relationships: An Examination of The Moderating Effects of Conflict Frequency. Journal of Business Logistics, 31 (2), 253277.
  • Calhoun, P. S., & Smith, W. P. (1999). Integrative Bargaining: Does Gender Make a Difference. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10 (3), 203224.
  • Campbell, N. C., Graham, J. L., Jolibert, A., & Meissner, H. G. (1988). Marketing Negotiations in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Journal of Marketing, 52 (April), 4962.
  • Cooper, M. C., Lambert, D. M., & Pagh, J. D. (1997). Supply Chain Management: More than a New Name for Logistics. International Journal of Logistics Management, 8 (1), 114.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Croson, R. K., & Donohue, K. (2006). Behavioral Causes of the Bullwhip Effect and the Observed Value of Inventory Information. Management Science, 52 (3), 323336.
  • Dabholkar, P. A. (1994). Incorporating Choice into an Attitudinal Framework: Analyzing Models of Mental Comparison Process. Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (1), 100118.
  • Daugherty, P. J. (2011). Review of Logistics and Supply Chain Relationship Literature and Suggested Research Agenda. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 41 (1), 1631.
  • Day, G. S., & Klein, S. (1987). Cooperative Behavior in Vertical Markets: The Influence of Transaction Costs and Competitive Strategies. pp. 3966. In M. J. Houston (Ed.), Review of Marketing. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
  • Dwyer, R. F., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing Buyer–Seller Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51 (2), 1127.
  • Eckerd, S., & Bendoly, E. (2011). Introduction to the Discussion Forum on Using Experiments in Supply Chain Management Research. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47 (3), 34.
  • Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social Exchange Theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2 (1), 335362.
  • Fang, T. (2006). Negotiation: The Chinese Style. The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 21 (1), 5060.
  • Fisher, R. J. (1993). Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (September), 303315.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (3), 382388.
  • Fugate, B. S., Stank, T. P., & Mentzer, J. T. (2009). Linking Improved Knowledge Management to Operational and Organizational Performance. Journal of Operations Management, 27 (3), 247264.
  • Fugate, B. S., Thomas, R. W., & Golicic, S. L. (2012). The Impact of Coping with Time Pressure on Boundary Spanner Collaborative Behaviors. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 42 (7), 697715.
  • Ganesan, S. (1993). Negotiation Strategies and the Nature of Channel Relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 30 (2), 183203.
  • Ganesan, S., Brown, S. P., Mariadoss, B. J., & Ho, H. D. (2010). Buffering and Amplifying Effects of Relationship Commitment in Business-to-Business Relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (April), 361373.
  • Garver, M. S., & Mentzer, J. T. (1999). Logistics Research Methods: Employing Structural Equation Modeling to Test for Construct Validity. Journal of Business Logistics, 20 (1), 3357.
  • Gelfand, M. J., Major, V. S., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L. H., & O'Brien, K. (2006). Negotiating Relationally: The Dynamics of the Relational Self in Negotiations. Academy of Management Review, 31 (2), 427451.
  • Golicic, S. L., & Mentzer, J. T. (2006). An Empirical Examination of Relationship Magnitude. Journal of Business Logistics, 27 (1), 81108.
  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement. American Sociological Review, 25 (2), 161178.
  • Graham, J. L. (1985). “Cross cultural marketing negotiations: A laboratory experiment.” Marketing Science, 4, 130146.
  • Graham, J. L., Mintu, A. T., & Rodgers, W. (1994). Explorations of Negotiation Behaviors in Ten Foreign Cultures Using a Model Developed in the United States. Management Science, 40 (1), 7295.
  • Grewel, D., Roggeveen, A. L., & Tsiros, M. (2008). The Effect of Compensation on Repurchase Intentions in Service Recovery. Journal of Retailing, 84 (4), 424434.
  • Grice, G. R. (1966). Dependence of Empirical Laws upon the Source of Experimental Variation. Psychological Bulletin, 66 (December), 488498.
  • Griffith, D. A., Harvey, M. G., & Lusch, R. F. (2006). Social Exchange in Supply Chain Relationships: The Resulting Benefits of Procedural and Distributive Justice. Journal of Operations Management, 24 (2), 8598.
  • Gundlach, G. T., & Cadotte, E. R. (1994). Exchange Interdependence and Interfirm Interaction: Research in a Simulated Channel Setting. Journal of Marketing Research, 31 (4), 516532.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. (7th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Herbst, U., Voeth, M., & Meister, C. (2011). What Do We Know About Buyer–Supplier Negotiations in Marketing Research? A Status Quo Analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 40 (6), 967978.
  • Huang, X., Gattiker, T. F., & Schwarz, J. L. (2008). Interpersonal Trust Formation during the Supplier Selection Process: The Role of the Communication Channel. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44 (3), 5375.
  • Jambulingam, T., Kathuria, R., & Nevin, J. R. (2011). Fairness–Trust–Loyalty Relationship Under Varying Conditions of Supplier–Buyer Interdependence. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19 (1), 3956.
  • Kannan, V. R., & Tan, K. C. (2002). Supplier Selection and Assessment: Their Impact on Business Performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38 (4), 1121.
  • Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of Behavioral Research. United States: Thomson Learning.
  • Knemeyer, A. M., & Naylor, R. W. (2011). Using Behavioral Experiments to Expand our Horizons and Deepen our Understanding of Logistics and Supply Chain Decision Making. Journal of Business Logistics, 32 (4), 296302.
  • Krause, D. R., Terpend, R., & Petersen, K. J. (2006). Bargaining Stances and Outcomes in Buyer–Seller Negotiations: Experimental Results. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 42 (3), 415.
  • Kumar, N., Scheer, L. K., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. M. (1995). The Effects of Perceived Interdependence on Dealer Attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 32 (August), 348356.
  • Kusaba, K., Moser, R., & Rodrigues, A. M. (2011). Low-Cost Country Sourcing Competence: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Analysis. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47 (4), 7393.
  • Kwon, I. W. G., & Suh, T. (2004). Factors Affecting the Level of Trust and Commitment in Supply Chain Relationships. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 40 (2), 414.
  • Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lusch, R. F., & Brown, J. R. (1996). Interdependency, Contracting, and Relational Behavior in Marketing Channels. Journal of Marketing, 60 (4), 1938.
  • Machuca, J. A., & Barajas, R. P. (2004). The Impact of Electronic Data Interchange on Reducing Bullwhip Effect and Supply Chain Inventory Costs. Transportation Research: Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 40 (3), 209228.
  • McDonald, G. W. (1981). Structural Exchange and Marital Interaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 43 (4), 825839.
  • McGrath, J. E. (1982). Dilemmatics: The Study of Research Choice and Dilemmas. In Judgment Calls in Research (pp. 69100). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Mentzer, J. T., Dewitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., & Zacharia, Z. G. (2001). Defining Supply Chain Management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22 (2), 125.
  • Mick, D. G., Demoss, M., & Faber, R. J. (1992). A Projective Study of Motivations and Meanings of Self Gifts: Implications for Retail Management. Journal of Retailing, 68 (2), 122145.
  • Miller, D. L., & Karakowsky, L. (2005). Gender Influences as an Impediment to Knowledge Sharing: When Men and Women Fail to Seek Peer Feedback. Journal of Psychology, 139 (2), 101118.
  • Mintu-Wimsatt, A., & Calantone, R. J. (1996). Exploring Factors that Affect Negotiators' Problem-Solving Orientation. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 11 (6), 6173.
  • Mintu-Wimsatt, A., & Gassenheimer, J. B. (2000). The Moderating Effects of Cultural Context in Buyer–Seller Negotiation. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 20 (Winter), 19.
  • Mintu-Wimsatt, A., & Graham, J. L. (2004). Testing a Negotiation Model on Canadian Anglophone and Mexican Exporters. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32 (3), 345356.
  • Modi, S. B., & Mabert, V. A. (2007). Supplier Development: Improving Supplier Performance through Knowledge Transfer. Journal of Operations Management, 25 (1), 4264.
  • Mohr, J. J., & Sohi, R. S. (1995). Communication Flows in Distribution Channels: Impact on Assessment of Communication Quality and Satisfaction. Journal of Retailing, 71 (4), 393416.
  • Nair, A., Narasimhan, R., & Bendoly, E. (2011). Coopetitive Buyer–Supplier Relationship: An Investigation of Bargaining Power, Relational Context, and Investment Strategies. Decision Sciences, 42 (1), 93127.
  • Narasimhan, R., Nair, A., Griffith, D. A., Arlbju, J. S., & Bendoly, E. (2009). Lock-in Situations in Supply Chains: A Social Exchange theoretic Study of Sourcing Arrangements in Buyer–Supplier Relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 27 (5), 374389.
  • Neu, J., Graham, J. L., & Gilly, M. C. (1988). The Influence of Gender on Behaviors and Outcomes in Retail Buyer–Seller Negotiation Simulation. Journal of Retailing, 64 (4), 427451.
  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory. (3rd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Pilling, B. K., Crosby, L. A., & Jackson, D. W. (1994). Relational Bonds in Industrial Exchange: An Experimental Test of the Transaction Cost Economic Framework. Journal of Business Research, 30 (3), 237251.
  • Purdue, B. C., & Summer, J. O. (1986). Checking the Success of Manipulations in Marketing Experiments. Journal of Marketing Research, 23 (4), 317326.
  • Ramsay, J. (2004). Serendipity and the Realpolitik Of Negotiations in Supply Chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9 (3), 219229.
  • Rinehart, L. M., Cadotte, E. R., & Langley, C. J. (1988). Shipper–Carrier Contract Negotiation: A Conceptual Foundation for Logistics Managers. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 18 (6), 4351.
  • Rinehart, L. M., Eckert, J. A., Handfield, R. B., Page, T. J., & Atkin, T. (2004). An Assessment of Supplier–Customer Relationships. Journal of Business Logistics, 25 (1), 2562.
  • Rubin, J. Z., & Brown, B. R. (1975). The Social Psychology of Bargaining and Negotiation. New York: Academic Press.
  • Rungtusanatham, M., Wallin, C., & Eckerd, S. (2011). The Vignette in a Scenario-Based Role-Playing Experiment. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47 (3), 916.
  • Sawyer, A. G. (1975). Demand Artifacts in Laboratory Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 1 (March), 2030.
  • Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (3), 325343.
  • Siemsen, E. (2011). The Usefulness of Behavioral Laboratory Experiments in Supply Chain Management Research. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47 (3), 1718.
  • Srivastava, J., & Chakravarti, D. (2009). Channel Negotiations with Information Asymmetries: Contingent Influences of Communication and Trustworthiness Reputations. Journal of Marketing Research, 46 (August), 557572.
  • Stern, L., El-Ansary, A., & Coughlin, A. (2001). Marketing Channels. (6th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Stevens, C. K. A. Y. (2011). Questions To Consider When Selecting Student Samples. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47 (3), 1921.
  • Terpend, R., Tyler, B. B., Krause, D. R., & Handfield, R. B. (2008). Buyer–Supplier Relationships: Derived Value Over Two Decades. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44 (2), 2855.
  • Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: Wiley.
  • Thomas, R. W. (2011). When Student Samples Make Sense in Logistics Research. Journal of Business Logistics, 32 (3), 286289.
  • Thomas, R. W., Esper, T. L., & Stank, T. P. (2010). Testing the Negative Effects of Time Pressure in Retail Supply Chain Relationships. Journal of Retailing, 86 (4), 386400.
  • Thomas, R. W., Fugate, B. S., & Koukova, N. T. (2011). Coping with Time Pressure and Knowledge Sharing in Buyer–Supplier Relationships. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47 (3), 2242.
  • Thye, S. R. (2007). Logical and Philosophical Foundations of Experimental Research in the Social Sciences. Laboratory Experiments in the Social Sciences. (1st ed.) Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
  • Tokar, T. (2010). Behavioural Research in Logistics and Supply Chain Management. International Journal of Logistics Management, 21 (1), 89103.
  • Tokar, T., Aloysius, J. A., Waller, M. A., & Williams, B. D. (2011). Retail Promotions and Information Sharing in the Supply Chain: A Controlled Experiment. International Journal of Logistics Management, 22 (1), 525.
  • Trautmann, G., Turkulainen, V., Hartmann, E., & Bals, L. (2009). Integration in the Global Sourcing Organization — An Information Processing Perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45 (2), 5774.
  • Wagner, S. M., Coley, L. S., & Lindemann, E. (2011). Effects of Suppliers' Reputation on the Future of Buyer–Supplier Relationships: the Mediating Roles of Outcome Fairness and Trust. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47 (2), 2948.
  • Waller, M. A., & Fawcett, S. (2011). Switching Our Lenses for New Perspectives: A Prescription for Writing and Reviewing Out of Your Comfort Zone. Journal of Business Logistics, 32 (3), 209213.
  • Wolfe, R., & McGinn, K. (2005). Perceived Relative Power and Its influence on Negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiation, 14 (1), 320.
  • Xu, L., & Beamon, B. M. (2006). Supply Chain Coordination and Cooperation Mechanisms: An Attribute-Based Approach. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 42 (1), 412.
  • Zachariassen, F. (2008). Negotiation Strategies in Supply Chain Management. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 38 (10), 764781.