Get access

The Resurgence of the Vacuum Erection Device (VED) for Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction

Authors


Corresponding Author: Hossein Sadeghi-Nejad, MD, Surgery, Division of Urology, UMDNJ New Jersey Medical School, 185 South Orange Ave., MSB G 536, Newark, NJ 07103-2714, USA. Tel: (973) 972-4488; Fax: (973) 395-7197; E-mail: hossein@ix.netcom.com; hossein.sadeghi-nejad@med.va.gov

Abstract

Introduction

Vacuum erection devices (VEDs) have been approved in the United States since 1982 and offer a viable alternative to oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i), injections and transurethral suppositories. Studies have demonstrated efficacy in erectile dysfunction (ED) associated with a variety of conditions. More recently, this modality has been evaluated in initial phosphodiesterase inhibitor nonresponders as well as for post-prostatectomy penile rehabilitation.

Aim

This article provides a detailed overview of the history of VEDs, a review of the literature, and a concise description of their new applications in modern urological practice.

Methods

A retrospective review of publications relevant to the field of VEDs.

Main Outcome Measures

Review of the historical milestones, evolution, and modern utilization of VEDs in modern urological protocols.

Results

Studies have demonstrated efficacy in ED associated with a variety of conditions. Early penile rehabilitation after surgery for prostate cancer with the VED appears to improve erectile function and penile length. Adverse events are transient and not serious.

Conclusions

The VED has continued to show efficacy for treatment of ED due to various etiologies and should be considered an attractive second-line therapy. In select cases such post-prostatectomy penile rehabilitation, as well as in men who cannot use a PDE5i, the vacuum device should be considered first-line treatment.

Ancillary