Research Note

You have free access to this content

Acceptance of Evolution and Support for Teaching Creationism in Public Schools: The Conditional Impact of Educational Attainment

  1. Joseph O. Baker*

Article first published online: 1 MAR 2013

DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12007

Issue

Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

Volume 52, Issue 1, pages 216–228, March 2013

Additional Information

How to Cite

Baker, J. O. (2013), Acceptance of Evolution and Support for Teaching Creationism in Public Schools: The Conditional Impact of Educational Attainment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52: 216–228. doi: 10.1111/jssr.12007

Author Information

  1. Department of Sociology and Anthropology, East Tennessee State University

*Correspondence should be addressed to Joseph O. Baker, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, East Tennessee State University, P.O. Box 70644, Johnson City, TN 37614. E-mail: bakerjo@etsu.edu

  1. Acknowledgments: Wave II of the Baylor Religion Survey was funded by a grant from the Templeton Foundation. The data are publicly available through the Association of Religion Data Archives. Thanks to Chris Bader, Paul Froese, Carson Mencken, and Bill N. Duncan for helpful comments on previous drafts. An earlier version of this study was presented at the 2008 meeting of SSSR in Louisville, KY.

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 1 MAR 2013
  2. Article first published online: 1 MAR 2013

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article with Supporting Information (HTML) Get PDF (195K)

References

  • Aiken, Leona S. and Stephen G. West. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Allison, Paul D. 1999. Logistic regression using the SAS system: Theory and application. Cary, NC: SAS Publishing.
  • Alters, Brian J. and Craig E. Nelson. 2002. Perspective: Teaching evolution in higher education. International Journal of Organic Evolution 56(10):1891–1901.
  • Ammerman, Nancy T. 1987. Bible believers: Fundamentalists in the modern world. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Bader, Christopher, Paul D. Froese, and F. Carson Mencken. 2007. American piety 2005: Methods and select findings from the Baylor Religion Survey. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 46(4):447–63.
    Direct Link:
  • Baker, Joseph O. 2012. Public perceptions of incompatibility between “science and religion.” Public Understanding of Science 21(3):340–53.
  • Bartkowski, John P. 1996. Beyond biblical literalism and inerrancy: Conservative Protestants and the hermeneutic interpretation of scripture. Sociology of Religion 57(3):259–72.
  • Berkman, Michael B. and Eric Plutzer. 2005. Ten thousand democracies: Politics and public opinion in America's school districts. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Berkman, Michael B. and Eric Plutzer. 2009. Scientific expertise and the culture war: Public opinion and the teaching of evolution in the American states. Perspectives on Politics 7(3):485–99.
  • Berkman, Michael B. and Eric Plutzer. 2010. Evolution, creationism, and the battle to control America's classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Binder, Amy J. 2002. Contentious curricula: Afrocentrism and creationism in American public schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Binder, Amy J. 2007. Gathering intelligence on intelligent design: Where did it come from, where is it going, and how should progressives manage it? American Journal of Education 113(4):549–76.
  • Boone, Kathleen C. 1989. The Bible tells them so: The discourse of Protestant fundamentalism. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Brossard, Dominique, Dietram A. Scheufele, Eunkyong Kim, and Bruce V. Lewenstein. 2009. Religiosity as a perceptual filter: Examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science 18(5):546–58.
  • Bruce, Steve. 2008. Fundamentalism, 2nd edition Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Chaves, Mark. 2011. American religion: Contemporary trends. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Dagher, Zoubeida R. and Saouma BouJaoude. 1997. Scientific views and religious beliefs of college students: The case of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34(5):429–45.
    Direct Link:
  • Deckman, Melissa. 2002. Holy ABCs! The impact of religion on attitudes about education policies. Social Science Quarterly 83(2):472–87.
    Direct Link:
  • Eckberg, Douglas L. 1992. Social influences on belief in creationism. Sociological Spectrum 12(2):145–65.
  • Eckberg, Douglas L. and Alexander Nesterenko. 1985. For and against evolution: Religion, social class, and the symbolic universe. Social Science Journal 22(1):1–17.
  • Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987).
  • Ellison, Christopher G. and Mark A. Musick. 1995. Conservative Protestantism and public opinion toward science. Review of Religious Research 36(3):245–62.
  • Epperson v. Arkansas, 393 U.S. 97 (1968).
  • Erikson, Kai T. 1966. Wayward Puritans: A study in the sociology of deviance. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Evans, John H. 2011. Epistemological and moral conflict between religion and science. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 50(4):707–27.
    Direct Link:
  • Gibson, Troy M. 2004. Culture wars in state education policy: A look at the relative treatment of evolutionary theory in state science standards. Social Science Quarterly 85(5):1129–49.
    Direct Link:
  • Gieryn, Thomas F. 1983. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professionalization ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review 48(6):781–95.
  • Gieryn, Thomas F. 1999. Cultural boundaries of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Gieryn, Thomas F., George M. Blevins, and Stephen C. Zehr. 1985. Professionalization of American scientists: Public science and the creation/evolution trials. American Sociological Review 50(3):392–409.
  • Haider-Markel, Donald P. and Mark R. Joslyn. 2008. Pulpits versus ivory towers: Socializing agents and evolution attitudes. Social Science Quarterly 89(3):665–83.
    Direct Link:
  • Ham, Ken. 2006. Answers in Genesis. Green Forest, AR: Master Books.
  • Hill, Jonathan P. 2011. Faith and understanding: Specifying the impact of higher education on religious belief. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 50(3):533–51.
    Direct Link:
  • Hoffmann, John P. and John P. Bartkowski. 2008. Gender, religious tradition, and biblical literalism. Social Forces 86(3):1245–72.
  • Hood, Ralph W., Peter C. Hill, and W. Paul Williamson. 2005. The psychology of religious fundamentalism. New York: Guilford Press
  • Keeter, Scott, Gregory Smith, and David Masci. 2011. Religious belief and attitudes about science in the United States. In The culture of science: How the public relates to science across the globe, edited by Martin W. Bauer, Rajesh Shukla, and Nick Allum, pp. 336–52. New York: Routledge.
  • Kitzmiller et al. v. Dover Area School District, 400 F. Supp 2d 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005).
  • Larson, Edward L. 1997. Summer for the gods: The Scopes trial and America's continuing debate over science and religion. New York: Basic Books.
  • Larson, Edward L. 2003. Trial and error: The American controversy over creation and evolution, 3rd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Lawrence, Bruce B. 1989. Defenders of God: The fundamentalist revolt against the modern age. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
  • Lawson, Anton E. and William A. Worsnop. 1992. Learning about evolution and rejecting a belief in special creation: Effects of reflective reasoning skill, prior knowledge, prior belief and religious commitment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29(2):143–66.
    Direct Link:
  • Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Marsden, George M. 2006. Fundamentalism and American culture, 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Mayrl, Damon and Jeremy Uecker. 2011. Higher education and religious liberalization among young adults. Social Forces 90(1):181–208.
  • Mazur, Allan. 2004. Believers and disbelievers in evolution. Politics and the Life Sciences 23(2):55–61.
  • McLean v. Arkansas Board of Education, 529 F. Supp. 1255 (E.D. Ark. 1982).
  • Menard, Scott. 2010. Binary logistic regression: From introductory to advanced concepts and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Miller, Jon D., Eugenie C. Scott, and Shinji Okamoto. 2006. Public acceptance of evolution. Science 313(5788):765–66.
  • Numbers, Ronald L. 1998. Darwinism comes to America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Numbers, Ronald L. 2006. The creationists: From scientific creationism to intelligent design, exp. edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Plutzer, Eric and Michael Berkman. 2008. The polls—Trends: evolution, creationism, and the teaching of human origins in schools. Public Opinion Quarterly 72(3):540–53.
  • Putnam, Robert D. and David E. Campbell. 2011. American grace: How religion divides and unites us. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Reimer, Sam. 2010. Education and theological liberalism: Revisiting the old issue. Sociology of Religion 71(4):393–408.
  • Rubin, Donald B. 1987. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Scott, Eugenie C. 2009. Evolution vs. creationism: An introduction, 2ndedition. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
  • Scott, Eugenie C. and Glenn Branch, eds. 2006. Not in our classrooms: Why intelligent design is wrong for our schools. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Sikkink, David. 1999. The social sources of alienation from public schools. Social Forces 78(1):51–86.
  • Sinclair, Anne and Murray P. Pendarvis. 1998. Evolution vs. conservative religious beliefs. Journal of College Science Teaching 27(3):167–70.
  • Smith, Christian. 1998. American evangelicalism: Embattled and thriving. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Steensland, Brian, Jerry Z. Park, Mark D. Regnerus, Lynn D. Robinson, W. Bradford Wilcox, and Robert Woodberry. 2000. The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces 79(1):291–324.
  • Stroope, Samuel. 2011. Education and religion: Individual, congregational, and cross-level interaction effects on biblical literalism. Social Science Research 40(6):1478–93.
  • Toumey, Christopher P. 1994. God's own scientists: Creationists in a secular world. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Uecker, Jeremy E. 2009. Catholic schooling, Protestant schooling, and religious commitment in young adulthood. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 47(4):563–84.
    Direct Link:
  • Woodrum, Eric and Thomas Hoban. 1992. Support for prayer in school and creationism. Sociology of Religion 53(3):309–21.
View Full Article with Supporting Information (HTML) Get PDF (195K)