Supplemental patient education for patients taking oral anticoagulants: systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors

  • P. Y. H. Wong,

    1. Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    Search for more papers by this author
  • S. Schulman,

    1. Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    Search for more papers by this author
  • S. Woodworth,

    1. Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Search for more papers by this author
  • A. Holbrook

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    2. Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    3. Centre for Evaluation of Medicines, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    • Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    Search for more papers by this author

Correspondence: Anne Holbrook, Centre for Evaluation of Medicines, 105 Main St East, P1 Level, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 1G6, Canada.

Tel.: +1 905 522 1155, x 35269; fax: +1 905 528 7386.

E-mail: holbrook@mcmaster.ca

Summary

Objective

Lack of patient knowledge has been associated with poor anticoagulation control, but the effect of patient education on clinical outcomes is unclear. We systematically reviewed the effect of supplemental patient education vs. usual care on hemorrhage, thromboembolic events (TEEs), time in therapeutic range (TTR) and knowledge test scores for all oral anticoagulants.

Data sources

The data sources were electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL and IPA, to February 2012 examining any oral anticoagulant. We reviewed references for additional potentially relevant studies.

Methods

Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were considered. Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted with GRADE. Pooled relative risks (RRs) were calculated, and heterogeneity was determined by use of χ2 and I2 statistics.

Results

Seven RCTs (n = 1209) were included in the systematic review, and five RCTs (n = 847) in the meta-analysis. All included studies examined vitamin K antagonists. No significant difference was found for hemorrhage (RR 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04–20.56), TEE (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.10–4.39), a composite outcome of hemorrhage or TEE (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.23–1.01), or TTR (mean absolute difference of 2.02%, 95% CI − 2.81 to 6.84). Evidence was conflicting on the impact of supplemental education on test scores. All trials had at least one substantial methodologic limitation.

Conclusion

Current evidence does not support supplemental patient education as a means to improve patient outcomes, but the quality of this evidence is poor. Larger randomized trials are needed with longer follow-up, recruitment of patients initiating anticoagulation in primary care settings, and clearly defined education interventions.

Ancillary