SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abramson, C. M. (2012). From “either-or” to “when and how”: A context-dependent Model of culture. Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior. 42(2), 155180.
  • Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
  • Antweiler, C. (2009). Universalien im Kontext kultureller Vielfalt. Erwägen, Wissen, Ethik, 3, 341352.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  • Barbalet, J. W. (1997). The Jamesian theory of action. The Sociobiological Review, 45(1), 102121.
  • Bickhard, M. H. (1992). Myths of science: Misconceptions of science in contemporary psychology. Theory & Psychology, 2(3), 321337.
  • Berry, J. (1969). On cross-cultural comparability. International Journal of Psychology, 119128.
  • Berry, J. (1989). Imposed etics—emics—derived etics. The operationalization of a compelling idea. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 721735.
  • Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., & Dasen, P. R. (1992). Cross-cultural psychology. Research and applications. University of Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bischof, N. (1981). Aristoteles, Galilei, Kurt Lewin und die Folgen. In W. Michaelis (Hrsg.), Bericht über den 32. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Zürich (Bd. 1, S. 17–39). Göttingen: Verlag für Psychologie.
  • Boesch, E. E. (1971). Zwischen zwei Wirklichkeiten. Prolegomena zu einer ökologischen Psychologie. Bern: Huber.
  • Boesch, E. E. (1976). Psychopathologie des Alltags—zur Ökopsychologie des Handelns und seiner Störungen. Bern: Huber.
  • Boesch, E. E. (1991). Symbolic action theory and cultural psychology. Berlin: Springer.
  • Boring, E. G. (1929/1959). A history of experimental psychology. N.Y.: Appleton-century crofts. Inc.
  • Brentano, F. (1874). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. Von der Klassifikation psychischer Phänomene. Leipzig.
  • Brush, S. B., & Stabinsky, D. (Eds.) (1996). Valuing local knowledge: indigenous peoples and intellectual property rights. Washington D.C .: Islan Press.
  • Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bühler, K. (1927). Die Krise der Psychologie. Jena: Verlag Gustav Fischer.
  • Campbell, D. T. (1974). “Downward causation” in hierarchically organized biological systems. In F. J. Ayala, & T. Dobshansky (Eds.), Studies in the Philosophy of Biology: Reduction and related Problems (pp.179186). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of Cal. Press.
  • Chakkarath, P. (2005). What can Western Psychology learn from Indigenous Psychologists? Lesson from Hindu Psychology. In W. Friedlmeier, P. Chakkarath, & B. Schwarz (Eds.), Culture and human development (pp. 3151), N. Y.: Psychology Press.
  • Chen, S. X. (2010). From emic to etic: Exporting indigenous construct. Social and Personality Psychology, Compass 4/6, (pp. 364378), 10.1111/j.175-9004.2010.00268.
  • Cole, M. (1990). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline? In J. J. Berman (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation 1989 “Cross-cultural perspectives” (pp. 273335). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology. A once and future discipline. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Cole, M. J., Gay, & Glick, J. A. (1968). A cross-cultural study of information processing. International Journal of Psychology, 3, 93102.
  • Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. London: Sage.
  • Davies, P. C. W. (2006). The physics of downward causation. In P. Clayton, & P. Davies (Eds.), The re-emergence of emergence. The emergentist hypothesis from science to religion (pp. 3552). Oxford: Oxford University press.
  • Dennet, D. C. (1991). Consciousness Explained. Boston/New York/London: Little, Brown and Company.
  • Dilthey, W. (1894/1968). Ideen über eine beschreibende und zergliedernde Psychologie. In W. Dilthey (Hrsg.), Gesammelte Schriften: Die geistige Welt- Einleitung in die Philosophie des Lebens: Abhandlung zur Grundlegung der Geisteswissenschaften (Bd. 5, S. 139–240). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
  • Eckensberger, L. H. (1979). A metamethodological evaluation of psychological theories from a cross-cultural perspective. In L. H. Eckensberger, W. Lonner, & Y. H. Poortinga (Eds.), Cross-cultural contributions to psychology (pp. 225275). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
  • Eckensberger, L. H. (1990). On the necessity of the culture concept in psychology: A view from cross-cultural psychology. In F. J. R. van de Vijver, & G. J. M. Hutschemaekers (Eds.), The investigation of culture. Current issues in cultural psychology (pp.153183). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
  • Eckensberger, L. H. (1993). Zur Beziehung zwischen den Kategorien des Glaubens und der Religion in der Psychologie. In T. V. Gramkrelidze (Hrsg.), Brücken. Beiträge zum Dialog der Wissenschaften aus den Partneruniversitäten Praha, Saarbrücken, Sofia, Tbilissi und Warszawa (S. 49–104). Tbilissi: Universitätsdruck.
  • Eckensberger, L. H. (1994). On the social psychology of cross-cultural research. In A.-M. Bouvey, F. J. R. van de Vijver, P. Boski, & P. Schmitz (Eds.), Journeys into cross-cultural psychology (pp. 3140). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
  • Eckensberger, L. H. (1995). Activity or action: Two different roads towards an integration of culture into psychology? Psychology & Culture, 1, 6780.
  • Eckensberger, L. H. (1996). Agency, action and culture: Three basic concepts for cross-cultural psychology. In J. Pandey, D. Sinha, & D. P. S. Bhawuk (Eds.), Asian contributions to cross-cultural psychology (pp. 72102). New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.
  • Eckensberger, L. H. (2001). The beginning of social cognition and self. Paper presented at the National Seminar on “Theoretical Approaches to early Development: Implications for Intervention” January 09–11, 2001, Department of Human Development and Family S, Faculty of Home science. M.S. University of Baroda, Vadodara. India Studies.
  • Eckensberger, L. H. (2002). Paradigms revisited: From incommensurability to respected complementarity. In H. Keller, Y. H. Poortinga, & A. Schölmerich (Eds.), Biology, culture, and development: Integrating diverse perspectives (pp. 341383). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Eckensberger, L. H. (2004). Development applied: In search of an applicable culture informed developmental theory: Reflections prompted by four Bulletin articles. Cross-Cultural Psychology Bulletin, 38(1–2), 2534.
  • Eckensberger, L. H. (2006). The mutual relevance of indigenous psychology and morality. In Uichol Kim, Kuo-Shu Yang, & Kwang-Kuo Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and Cultural Psychology. Understanding People in Context (pp. 225245). Heidelberg: Springer (International and Cultural Psychology).
  • Eckensberger, L. H. (2007). Culture and self: An action theory perspective . Invited lecture at the international conference. The culturalization of the self. University of Chemnitz, Nov.28–Dec. 1.
  • Eckensberger, L. H. (2011). Cross-cultural differences as meaning systems. In S. M. Breugelmans, A. Chasiotis, & F. J. R. van de Vijver (Eds.), Fundamental Questions in Cross-Cultural Psychology (pp. 407441). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Eckensberger, L. H. (2012). Culture inclusive action theory: Action theory in dialectics and dialectics in action theory. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 357401). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Eckensberger, L. H., & Burgard, P. (1983). The cross-cultural assessment of normative concepts: Some considerations on the affinity between methodological approaches and preferred theories. In S. H. Irvine, & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Human assessment and cultural factors (pp. 459480). New York: Plenum Press.
  • Eckensberger, L. H., & Plath, I. (2003). Möglichkeiten und Grenzen des “variablenorientierten” Kulturvergleichs: Von der Kulturvergleichenden Psychologie zur Kulturpsychologie. In H. Kaelble, & J. Schriewer (Hrsg.), Vergleich und Transfer, Komparatistik in den Sozial-, Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften (S. 55–99). Frankfurt: Campus.
  • Eckensberger, L. H., & Emminghaus, W. B. (1982). Moralisches Urteil und Aggression: Zur Systematisierung und Präzisierung des Aggressionskonzeptes sowie einiger empirischer Befunde. In R. Hilke, & W. Kempf (Hrsg.), Aggression. Naturwissenschaftliche und kulturwissenschaftliche Perspektiven der Aggressionsforschung (S. 208–280). Bern: Huber.
  • Eckensberger, L. H., Kreibich-Fischer, R., Gaul, G., & Schnurre, M. (1990). Affektive und kognitive Verarbeitung des Krankheitsgeschehens krebskranker Patienten. In U. Koch, & F. Potreck-Rose (Hrsg.), Krebsrehabilitation und Psychoonkologie (S. 157–174). Berlin: Springer.
  • Enriquez, V. G. (1990). Indigenous psychologies. Quezon City, Phillipines: Psychological Research and Training House.
  • Evenden, M., & Sandstrom, G. (2011). Calling for scientific revolution in Psychology: K.K. Hwang in Indigenous Psychologies. Social Epistemology (pp. 153166).
  • Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method. Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. Humanity Press.
  • Fontaine, J. R. J. (2011). A fourfold conceptual framework for cultural and cross-cultural psychology: relativism, construct universalism, repertoire universalism and absolutism. In S. M. Breugelmans, A. Chasiotis, & F. J. R. van de Vijver (Eds.), Fundamental Questions in Cross-Cultural Psychology (pp. 165189). Cambridge University Press.
  • Frezzo, M. (2004). The ambivalent role of psychology and psychoanalysis. In R. E. Lee, & I. M. Wallerstein (Eds.), Overcoming the two cultures. Science versus the humanities in the modern world system (pp. 7386). Boulder, London: Paradigm Publications.
  • Gehlen, A. (1940). Der Mensch, seine Natur und seine Stellung in der Welt. Junker und Dünnhaupt: Berlin.
  • Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
  • Greenfield, P. M. (2000). Three approaches to the psychology of culture. Where do they come from? Where can they go? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 223240.
  • Gülerce, A. (1997). Change in the process of change: Coping with indeterminism. In A. Fogel, M. A. Lyra, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Process of Change and Indeterminism (pp. 3964). Hillsdale, N.J.: Plenum.
  • Haste, H. (2008). Constructing competence: Discourse, identity and culture. In I. Plath, I. Graudenz, & H. Breit (Eds.), Kultur—Handlung—Demokratie (pp. 109132). Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  • Hwang, K. K. (2006). Constructive realism and confuzian relationalism. An epistemological Strategy for the development of Indigenous Psychology. In U. Kim, K-S. Yang, & K-K. Hwang, (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology. Understanding people in context (pp. 73107). New York: Springer.
  • Juarrero, A. (1999). Dynamics in action. Intentional behaviour in complex systems. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
  • Jahoda, G. (1977). In pursuit of the emic-etic distinction: Can we ever capture it? In Y. Poortinga (Ed.), Basic problems in cross-cultural psychology. Selected papers from the third International conference of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology (pp. 5563). Swets & Zeitlinger.
  • Jahoda, G. (1990). Variables, System and the problem of explanation. In F. J. R. van de Vijver, & G. J. M. Hutschemaekers (Eds.), The investigation of culture. Current issues in cultural psychology (pp. 153183). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
  • Jahoda, G. (2012). Critical reflections on some recent definitions of “culture”. Culture & Psychology, 18(3) 289303.
  • Jüttemann, G. (Ed.) (2006). Wilhelm Wundt's anderes Erbe. Göttingen: Vandenhoek und Ruprecht.
  • Kashima, Y. (2005). Is culture a problem for social psychology? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 1938.
  • Keller, H., & Eckensberger, L. H. (1998). Kultur und Entwicklung. In H. Keller (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch. Entwicklungspsychologie (S. 11–56). Bern: Huber.
  • Kim, U. (2000). Indigenous, cultural, and cross-cultural psychology: A theoretical, conceptual and epistemological analysis. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 265287.
  • Kim, U. & Berry, J. W. (1993). Indigenous psychologies: Experience and research in cultural context. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Kim, U., & Park, Y. S. (2006). The scientific foundation of indigenous and cultural psychology. In U. Kim, K-S. Yang, & K-K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology. Understanding people in context (pp. 2748). New York: Springer.
  • Kim, U., Yang, K-S., & Hwang, K-K. (Eds). (2006). Indigenous and cultural psychology. Understanding people in context. New York: Springer.
  • Krewer, B., & Eckensberger, L. H. (1991). Selbstentwicklung und kulturelle Identität. In K. Hurrelmann, & D. Ulrich (Hrsg.), Neues Handbuch der Sozialisationsforschung (S. 573594). Weinheim: Beltz.
  • Krewer, B. (1992). Kulturelle Identität und menschliche Selbsterforschung. Die Rolle von Kultur in der positiven und reflexiven Bestimmung des Menschseins. Saarbrücken: Breitenbach.
  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1963). Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
  • Lakatos (1971). “History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions”, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 8.
  • Lewin, K. (1930/31). Der Übergang von der aristotelischen zur galileischen Denkweise in Biologie und Psychologie. Erkenntnis, 1, 421460 (=Annalen der Philosophie, Bd. 9). (Republished: Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1971).
  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper and Brothers.
  • Little, B. K. (1972). Psychological man as scientist. humanist and specialist. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 6, 95118.
  • Liu, J. H. (2011). Asian epistemologies and contemporary social psychological research. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (4th ed., pp. 213226). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lonner W. J., & Berry, J. W. (Eds.) (1986). Field methods in cross-cultural research, vol.8, Cross-Cultural Research and Methodology Series. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
  • Leontiev, A. N. (1977). Tätigkeit, Bewußtsein und Persönlichkeit. Stuttgart: Klett Cotta.
  • Mahoney, M. J. (2004). Constructivism and why is it growing? Contemporary Psychology, 49, 360363.
  • Malpass, R. S., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1986). Strategies for design and analysis. In W. J. Lonner, & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 4783). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Martin, J., & Sugarman, J. (1999). The psychology of human possibilities and constraints. New York: State University.
  • Martin, J., & Sugarman, J. (2009). Does interpretation in psychology differ from interpretation in natural science? Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour, 39(1), 2037.
  • Münsterberg, H. (1900). Grundzüge der Psychologie. Leipzig: Barth.
  • Murphy, N. (2010, submitted). Non reductive physicalism. Integrating science, theology, and Philosophy of mind. Integral Review.
  • Nsamenang, A. B. (1992). Human development in cultural context: A third world perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Neumer, K. (2010). “Die gemeinsame menschliche Handlungsweise” in Wittgensteins Nachlass. Wittgenstein-Studien. 1, 71120.
  • Overton, W. F. (1996). Relational-developmental Theory: A Psychology Perspective. In D. Gorlitz, H. J. Harloff, J. Valsiner, & G. Mey (Eds.), Children, cities and psychological theories: Developing relationships (pp. 315335). Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
  • Poortinga, Y. H. (1996). Indigenous psychology: Scientific egocentrism in a new guise? In J. Pandey, D. Sinha, & D. P. S. Bhawuk (Eds.), Asian contributions to cross-cultural psychology (pp. 5971). New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.
  • Popper, K. R. The tree worlds. The tanner lectures on human values. Delivered by Karl Popper at The University of Michigan on April 7, 1978.
  • Pike, K. L. (1967). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behaviour. The Hague: Mouton.
  • Price-Williams, D. R. (1975). Explorations in Cross-cultural psychology. San Francisco: Chandler & Sharp Publ.
  • Price-Williams, D. (1980). Toward the idea of a cultural psychology: A superordinate theme for study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 11, 7588.
  • Quine, W. v. O. (1976). Word & Object. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Ratner, C. (2007). Contextualism versus positivism in cross-cultural psychology. In G. Zheng, K. Leung, & J. G. Ardair (Eds.), Perspectives and progress in contemporary cross-cultural psychology. Selected papers from the seventh International congress of the International Association for Cross-cultural Psychology (pp. 3547). The Chinese Psychological Society.
  • Reese, H. W., & Overton, W. F. (1970). Models of development and theories of development. In L. R. Goulet, & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Research and theory (pp. 115145). New York: Academic Press.
  • Rickert, H. (19295) Die Grenzen der Naturwissenschaftlichen Begriffsbildung. Eine logische Einleitung in die historischen Wissenschaften. Tübingen und Leipzig: Mohr.
  • Riegel, K. (1979). Foundations of dialectical psychology. New York: Academic Press.
  • Rychlak, J. F. (1993). A suggested principle of complementarity for psychology. In theory, not method. American Psychologist Association, 48(9), 933942.
  • Robinson, D. N. (1976). An intellectual history of psychology. N.Y. Mc Millan.
  • Rosnow, R. L., & Georgoudi, M. (1986). The spirit of contextualism. In R. L. Rosnow, & M. Georgoudi (Eds.), Contextualism and understanding in social sciences. (pp. 322). N.J.: Praeger Publishers.
  • Sader, M., & Weber, H. (1996). Psychologie der Persönlichkeit. München: Juventa.
  • Schwartz, L. (1951). Die Neurosen und die dynamische Psychologie von Pierre Janet. Basel, Switzerland: Schwabe.
  • Schwemmer, O. (1980). Das Absolute. In J. Mittelstraß (Ed.), Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie (S. 32–35). Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut.
  • Shweder, R. A. (1990). Cultural psychology—what is it? In J. W. Stigler, R. A. Shweder, & G. Herdt (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 143). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Shweder, R. A. (2000). The psychology of practice and the practice of the three psycholohies. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 207222.
  • Sinha, D. (1993). Indigenization of Psychology in India and its relevance. In U. Kim, & J. J. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous Psychologies (pp. 3043). London: Sage.
  • Sinha, D. (1996). Cross-cultural psychology: The Asian scenario. In J. Pandey, D. Sinha, & D. P. S. Bhawuk (Eds.), Asian contributions to cross-cultural psychology (pp. 72102). New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.
  • Sinha, D. (1997). Indigenizing Psychology. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. I, pp. 129170). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Smedslund, J. (1984). The invisible obvious: Culture in psychology. In K. M. J. Lagerspetz, & P. Niemi (Eds.), Psychology in the 1990's (pp. 443451). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Smedslund, J. (2009). The mismatch between current research methods and the nature of psychological phenomena. What researchers must learn from practitioners. Theory & Psychology, 19, 778794.
  • Teo, T. (2008). From speculation to epistemological violence in psychology. Theory and Psychology, 18, 4767.
  • Teo, T. (2013). Backlash against American psychology: An indigenous reconstruction of the history of German critical psychology! Theory of Psychology, 16(1), 118.
  • Thakker, J., & Ward, T. (1998). Culture and classification: the cross-cultural application of the DSM-IV. Clinical Psychology Review, 18(5), 501529.
  • Triandis, H. C. (2009). The early stages of Cross-cultural Psychology. Cross-cultural Psychology Bulletin, 812.
  • UN-Declaration of the rights of indigenous people. N.Y. Sept. 13, 2007.
  • Valsiner, J. (1987). Culture and the development of children's action. New York: Wiley.
  • van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Vygotsky, L. (1927/1987). The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A methodological investigation. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Ward, C. (2007). Asian social psychology: Looking in and looking out. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 2231.
  • Windelband, W. (1904). Geschichte und Naturwissenschaft3. Straßburg: Heitz.
  • Wober, M. (1966). Sensotypes. Journal of Social Psychology, 70, 181189.
  • Wright, G. H. v. (1971). Explanation and understanding. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University.
  • Wundt, W. (1888). Über Ziele und Wege der Völkerpsychologie. Philosophische Studien, 4, 127.
  • Wundt, W. (1921). Logik der Geisteswissenschaften. Stuttgart.
  • Wundt, W. (1922). Grundriss der Psychologie. Leipzig.
  • Yang, K. S. (2000). Monocultural and cross-cultural indigenous approaches: The royal road to the development of a balanced global psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 241263.