SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • Domestic cat;
  • HCM ;
  • Meta-analysis;
  • Mutations;
  • SNP

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. References

Background

Two mutations in the MYBPC3 gene have been identified in Maine Coon (MCO) and Ragdoll (RD) cats with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).

Objective

This study examined the frequency of these mutations and of the A74T polymorphism to describe their worldwide distribution and correlation with echocardiography.

Animals: 1855 cats representing 28 breeds and random-bred cats worldwide, of which 446 underwent echocardiographic examination.

Methods

This is a prospective cross-sectional study. Polymorphisms were genotyped by Illumina VeraCode GoldenGate or by direct sequencing. The disease status was defined by echocardiography according to established guidelines. Odds ratios for the joint probability of having HCM and the alleles were calculated by meta-analysis. Functional analysis was simulated.

Results

The MYBPC3 A31P and R820W were restricted to MCO and RD, respectively. Both purebred and random-bred cats had HCM and the incidence increased with age. The A74T polymorphism was not associated with any phenotype. HCM was most prevalent in MCO homozygote for the A31P mutation and the penetrance increased with age. The penetrance of the heterozygote genotype was lower (0.08) compared with the P/P genotype (0.58) in MCO.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

A31P mutation occurs frequently in MCO cats. The high incidence of HCM in homozygotes for the mutation supports the causal nature of the A31P mutation. Penetrance is incomplete for heterozygotes at A31P locus, at least at a young age. The A74T variant does not appear to be correlated with HCM.

Abbreviations
A

adenine

BUN

blood urea nitrogen

C

cytosine

G

guanine

HCM

hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

IVS

interventricular septum

LA/Ao

left atrium/aortic root ratio

LV

left ventricle

LVW

left ventricular wall

MYBPC3

cardiac myosin binding protein c 3

OR

odds ratio

RMC

restrictive cardiomyopathy

SAM

systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve

SNP

single nucleotide polymorphism

T-4

l-thyroxine

T

thymine

US

ultrasounds

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common cardiac disease in cats. It also affects approximately one in 500 humans and exhibits an enormous phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity.[1, 2] In humans, over 630 mutations in at least 12 different genes, 10 of which are sarcomere genes, cause the “single” clinical entity of HCM.[3-5]

Animal models indicate that clinical disease is not the consequence of haplo-insufficiency or altered stoichiometry of sarcomere components, but occurs from the dominant effects of the mutant protein on sarcomeric function.[6] Presumably, sarcomere mutations alter the molecular process of muscle contraction and activate pathways for sarcomere replication that results in increased myocyte width and, consequently, wall thickness (hypertrophy).[7] However, many questions remain regarding the underlying disease mechanisms.

In cats, a breed prevalence, suggesting a heritable component for HCM, is described in Siberian, Sphynx, American Shorthair, Cornish Rex, Persian, European, British Shorthair, Bengal, Chartreux, and Norwegian Forest cats.[7-15] Autosomal dominant inheritance and 2 causal mutations resulting in amino acid substitution – A31P and R820W – in Cardiac Myosin-Binding Protein C3 (MYBPC3) have been identified in Maine Coons and Ragdolls with HCM, respectively.[9, 13] In humans, mutations in MYBPC3 typically exhibit low and age-related penetrance in heterozygotes. A few modifying genes and their proteins have been identified that contribute to the penetrance of these mutations, including the angiotensin-converting-enzyme gene and the gene that encodes for the angiotensin1-receptor.[16] These and other “modifying” genes, suggested by the incomplete penetrance and phenotypic heterogeneity, have not been identified in cats. Furthermore, no other major HCM causative mutations in other feline breeds have been identified.

Several studies have investigated the frequency of the HCM causative mutation in different countries and the correlation with HCM in Maine Coon cats.[17-19] However, these studies examined cats at only 1 time point and primarily younger cats that might not yet have begun to express a HCM phenotype. In March 2008, the “Osservatorio Italiano HCM Felina” (Italian Observatory on Feline Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy) was formed (http://www.hcmfelina.com/) from a network of breeders, veterinary geneticists, and clinicians to collectively evaluate feline HCM over time. This collaboration aims to monitor inherited diseases in cats, primarily HCM, in Italy. The observatory provides services to breeders and the scientific community, including (1) breeding advice; (2) providing genetic consultation to breeders and clinicians, mainly regarding the proper application of new genetic diagnostic tools; (3) organizing a group of selected veterinarians at the national level who operate under controlled and shared guidelines; (4) creating a bio bank and a database to share with the scientific community.

This study examines the frequency of the specific HCM-associated MYBPC3 mutations in purebred cats and worldwide random-bred feline populations. Besides the reported Maine Coon and Ragdoll mutations, another single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in MYBPC3 (A74T) was suspected to cause HCM in Maine Coons, although later disproven.[19, 20] Therefore, the A74T polymorphism was genotyped by sequencing Italian cats that have been examined by echocardiography via the observatory.

Materials and Methods

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. References

Animals

Pedigree cats (n = 1174) representing 28 breeds and 681 random-bred cats from 20 different geographic areas worldwide (n = 1855) were genotyped for MYBPC3 A31P and R820W mutations (Table 1) by Illumina VeraCode GoldenGate technology or classic direct sequencing. Only pedigree and random-bred cats from Italy with results, and therefore used in the odd ratio (OR) analysis, were tested for A74T polymorphism by classic direct sequencing (Table 3). Pedigree cats were provided by owners living in Italy and Italian-speaking Switzerland. Cats from the USA included cats from Northern and Southern California and Hawaii. No echocardiographic evaluations were performed on the majority of cats. However, a subset of 446 cats, including 232 Maine Coon, 37 Ragdoll, 37 random-bred from Italy, 55 Siberians, 35 Norwegian Forest cats, and 7 cats of other breeds, were screened for HCM by echocardiography. The sequence from a subset of 203 cats (11 breeds) was closely examined in the flanking regions of the A31P, A74T, and R820W sites in an attempt to identify additional polymorphisms.

Table 1. Breed and number of pedigreed and random bred cats genotyped at MYBPC3 HCM polymorphisms. Cats from Italy were genotyped for A31P, R820W, and A74T. Cats from USA were typed for the A31P and R820W loci
Pedigreed Breed PopulationsRandom Bred Cats
BreedOriginnBreedOriginnOriginn
Abyssinian (ABY)USA26Norwegian Forest CatUSA18BRAZIL30
American SH (ASH)USA13(NFC)Italy23CHINA20
BengalItaly4Persian (PER)USA94CYPRUS30
Birman (SBI)USA29 Italy3DUBAI9
British Shorthair (BSH)USA23Ragdoll (RAG)USA25EGYPT46
 Italy11 Italy141GERMANY29
Burmese (BUR)USA24Russian Blue (RUS)USA16INDIA27
Chartreuse (CHA)USA21Scottish Fold (SFS)USA15IRAQ4
Cornish rex (CRX)USA15Siamese (SIA)USA16IRAN112
Devon Rex (DRX)Italy1Siberian (SIB)USA15ISRAEL46
Egyptian Mau (MAU)USA15 Italy31ITALY59
Exotic (EXO)USA27Singapura (SIN)USA17KOREA39
Havana Brown USA10Sokoke (SOK)USA8KENYA36
Japanese Bobtail (JBT)USA19Sphynx (SPH)USA23PATE-LAMU30
Korat (KOR)USA25 Italy3SINGAPORE29
Maine Coon (MCO)USA31Turkish Angora (TUA)USA13SRI LANKA24
 Italy502Turkish Van (TUV)USA17TURKEY62
Manx (MAN)USA15   USA29
      VIETNAM20
   Total Pedigreed 1174Total random bred681

HCM Phenotyping

Fifteen veterinarians, all of whom have practices limited to cardiology, were accredited as examiners by the Scientific Committee of the observatory through a practical examination. The examinees submitted a complete study to the Scientific Committee. All echocardiographic images and measurements were digitally stored and analyzed to ensure that correct imaging planes, cursor placements, and left ventricular and left atrial measurements were obtained. Measurements by the examinee had to be within 0.5 mm (±0.25 mm) of the measurements obtained by the Scientific Committee by dedicated software (MayLab-Desk v6.10–Esaote and Sante DICOM Viewer v1.3.4). Veterinarians who successfully completed the examination were enrolled in the observatory and performed all the echocardiographic examinations to define the disease status of each cat. The echocardiographic studies were performed following the guidelines published on the website of the observatory and were based on the recommendations of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.[17] The results were submitted by every examiner to an on-line database. Measurements of end-diastolic thickness of the left ventricular (LV) walls (both septal and caudal wall) were obtained from the right parasternal short-axis view at the papillary muscle level in B-mode. From the same view, M-mode measurements of the left ventricular chamber dimensions and LV wall thickness (both septal and caudal wall) were obtained and shortening fraction calculated. Every focal thickening of the left ventricle septal and caudal wall was measured as well, during diastole, with particular regard to the possible presence of subaortic interventricular septal thickness or abnormal morphology of papillary muscles. The diameter of the root of the aorta and the left atrium were also measured and the left atrium/aortic root ratio (LA/Ao) was calculated by B-mode imaging from the right parasternal short-axis view at the aortic valve level.

Criteria for the categorization of HCM are presented in Table 2. HCM was classified as severe if LV wall was >7 mm, and where at least one of the following conditions was present: systolic LV chamber obliteration; presence of dynamic obstruction (systolic cranial motion of the mitral valve [SAM] or midventricular dynamic obstruction); left atrial enlargement or presence of a thrombus in the left atrium along with spontaneous echo contrast.

Table 2. Echocardiographic diagnostic criteria: Measurements of end-diastolic of the left ventricular wall (LVW) and interventricular septum (IVS) obtained from the right parastrenal short axis view in B/M mode. Clinical results and diagnosis
LVWed and/or IVSed Thickness (mm)ResultsHCMRecheck Time and Laboratory Tests
  1. Scheduled recheck times and further laboratory tests required to confirm the diagnosis. t4 = L-thyroxine, BUN = blood urea nitrogen.

≤ 5.5normalnegative12 months
> 5.5 and ≤ 6.0questionableborderline6 months
> 6.0 and ≤ 6.5affectedmild6 months + t4 creatinine, BUN and systemic blood pressure
> 6.5 and ≤ 7.0affectedmoderate6 months + t4 creatinine, BUN, and systemic blood pressure
> 7.0affectedsevere1–3 months + t4 creatinine, BUN, and systemic blood pressure

Before final submission of the measurements and calculations in the national database, the data and images were analyzed by MayLab Desk v6.10–Esaote and Sante DICOM Viewer v1.3.4 by 2 of 3 veterinarians comprising the Scientific Committee (PF and PK), to verify that the echocardiographic views and measurements were correctly obtained. In cases of doubt, the echocardiographic examination and measurements were analyzed by the 3rd member of the Scientific Committee (FP). Cats with severe papillary muscle hypertrophy (subjective evaluation) but no LV wall thickening were considered equivocal. In patients with a LV wall exceeding 6 mm, additional tests were performed to exclude cats with hyperthyroidism, renal failure, concurrent hypertension, and diabetes mellitus (see Table 2).

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from either buccal swabs or peripheral blood by commercial kits (Illustra Blood Genomic Prep Mini-Spin Kit,1 or QIAamp DNA blood mini kit2) according to the manufacturers' instructions.

Samples from Italy were genotyped by DNA sequencing both strands, using the ABI Dye Terminator Sequencing Chemistry 3.1 and an ABI310 analyzer,3 according to standard protocols. Template sequence for primer design and exon-intron boundary assignment was Ensemble ENSFCAG00000002530. Nomenclature for the description of sequence variations was according to denDunnen.[21] One amplicon of 209 bp included both the A31P mutation and A74T polymorphisms and a 2nd 396 bp amplicon included the R820W mutation. These were obtained using the following primers: F1-5′GAAGCCAAGGTCAGTGGAAG, R1-5′CCTACGCAGTCATCGCTG and F2-5′CAGCAATGTGGGTGAGGAC, R2-5′CTGACCAGGGAGGGTGTG, respectively. An additional amplicon of 442 bp (intron1-2/exon2) partially overlapping with F1-R1 amplicon was produced to analyze the 3′end of intron1-2, using the following primers: F3:5′TTCTGCCTACTGGCTGTGTG and R1:5′CCTACGCAGTCATCGCTG. Standard amplification with Flexi DNA Polymerase4 was performed in 30-μL final volume, using 33 cycles with 58°C and 62°C annealing temperature for the A31P-A74T and R820W fragments, respectively, on a 9300ABI.3 Big Dye Terminator v3.13 was used for sequencing and electrophoresis was performed on an Applied Biosystems 310 or 3100 DNA Analyzer. Multiple sequence traces were edited by BioEdit v7.0.5, and aligned and compared by MEGA v4.[22]

Samples from the other countries were genotyped by Illumina VeraCode GoldenGate Genotyping Assay.5 Primers were designed by the VeraCode Assay Designer software. Golden Gate Assay amplification and BeadXpress reads were performed per the manufacturer's protocol on 50–500 ng of DNA or whole genome amplified product. BeadStudio software v3.1.3.0 with the Genotyping module vs3.2.235 was used to analyze the data. Any sample with a call rate <0.80 was removed from further clustering analysis. The single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) had to have a Gen Train Score >0.55 to be included in the study.

Statistics

Allele and genotype frequencies were calculated by direct counting, with the A31P wild-type allele being guanine (G) and the mutant allele being cytosine (C). The A74T wild-type allele was guanine (G) and the putative-mutant allele was adenine (A). The R820W wild-type allele was cytosine (C) and the mutant allele was thymine (T).

Cats that underwent echocardiography were grouped according to age-classes as follows: 0=≤12 months, 1=13–24 months; 2=25–36 months; 3=37–48 months; 4=49–60 months; 5=≥61 months. The presence of HCM in the breeds was calculated after excluding cats with an equivocal diagnosis (borderlines). When comparing genotype with phenotype in Maine Coons, the cats were classified as healthy or affected; the latter comprised all degrees of HCM severity: mild, moderate, and severe.

The OR for the probability of having HCM and the mutant alleles was calculated for both the A31P and A74T changes independently, considering 4 scenarios: Scenario 1: Number of Maine Coons (both affected and healthy) homozygous mutation P/P versus number of Maine Coons (both affected and healthy) homozygous wildtype A/A at A31P mutation; and number of Maine Coons (both affected and healthy) homozygous mutation T/T versus number of Maine Coons (both affected and healthy) homozygous wildtype A/A at A74T mutation.

Scenario 2: Number of Maine Coons (both affected and healthy) heterozygous A/P versus number of Maine Coons (both affected and healthy) A/A at A31P locus; and number of Maine Coons (both affected and healthy) heterozygous A/T versus number of Maine Coons (both affected and healthy) A/A at A74T mutation.

Scenario 3: Number of Maine Coons (both affected and healthy) heterozygous A/P versus number of Maine Coons (both affected and healthy) P/P at A31P mutation; and number of Maine Coons (both affected and healthy) A/T versus number of Maine Coons (both affected and healthy) T/T at A74T mutation. [Correction made after online publication January 17, 2013: Scenario 3 has been updated]

Scenario 4: Number of Maine Coons (both affected and healthy) P/P and A/P versus A/A at A31P mutation; and number of Maine Coons (both affected and healthy) T/T and A/T versus A/A at A74T mutation.

A meta-analysis limited to A31P and A74T loci, pooling the present and previously published data[19, 23] was performed using all 4 analysis scenarios.

The OR for the joint probability of having HCM and both mutant at A31P and A74T sites was calculated; the OR of having HCM and a specific sex was also calculated. The ability of the test for the A31P mutation to predict the echocardiographic phenotype was evaluated by calculating sensitivity and specificity.

The model of the 1st domain of the wild-type MYBPC3 protein was made by Modeller 9v8[24] using the structure of human MYBPC3 (PDB file: 2K1M) as the template. Stereochemical quality of the protein was evaluated with Procheck[25] and the energetics of the structure was evaluated with Prosa.[26] Mutant forms of the protein were created using the script “Mutate_model” of Modeller DSSP,[27] NACCESS,[28] HBPLUS.[29] An in-house Perl script searching for the existence of possible salt bridges on the basis of the criteria formulated by Kumar and Nussinov[30] and the server PoPMusIC[31] was used for functional analyses. The impact of mutations on protein structure, function, and stability was evaluated taking into account effects on secondary structures, variation in the residue's solvent accessibility, disruption of H-bond and salt bridge patterns, and stability of the protein, similar to the evaluation of structural effects of mutations made on galactose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase, another protein involved in a genetic disease.[32]

Results

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. References

Random-bred and pedigreed cats (N = 1855) were genotyped for MYBPC-A31P, A74T, R820W, or any combination of these polymorphisms (Table 1). Only sequenced cats (column “Origin Italy” in Table 3) were genotyped for all the tree loci, whereas the cats analyzed with the feline DNA array were typed for the A31P and R820W, as A74T polymorphism is not included in the array (Table 3). The A31P mutation was present only in Maine Coons. The allelic frequencies in Maine Coons from Italy and the USA were 0.23 and 0.145, respectively. All other cats of non-Maine Coon and Ragdoll breeds were homozygous for the wild-type allele. The A74T SNP was present in random-bred cats and in all the pedigreed breeds, except the Devon Rex (n = 1). The allele frequency was high in the British Shorthair (0.32) and random-bred cats (0.53), and ranged from a low 0.17 in Persian and Maine Coon cats to fixed in the 4 Bengal cats analyzed. The R820W mutant allele was recorded only in Ragdolls. The allelic frequencies were 0.17 in cats from Italy and 0.23 in cats from the USA. All other cats were homozygous for the wild-type allele (Table 3).

Table 3. Genotypic and allelic frequencies at MYBPC3 polymorphisms in pedigreed and random bred cats
BreedaOriginA31P    A74T    R820W     
  1. a

    Only the breeds and populations positive for the mutant alleles at A31P (C) and R820W (T) or tested at A74T SNP are shown in the table. The remaining typed breeds are listed in Table 1.

  2. A = adenine, T = thymine, G = guanine, C = cytosine.

  n. G/GG/CC/CCn. G/GG/AA/AAn. C/CC/TT/TT
BengalItaly4100040.000.001.001.0041000
British ShorthairItaly111000110.640.090.270.32101000
Devon RexItaly1100011.000.000.000.0011000
Maine CoonItaly5020.620.300.080.233590.680.290.030.17951000
 USA310.7740.1610.0640.145.....311000
Norwegian ForestItaly231000210.570.430.000.21221000
PersianItaly3100030.670.330.000.1731000
RagdollItaly271000260.500.460.040.271410.670.320.010.17
 USA251000.....240.5830.3750.0410.229
SiberianItaly311000300.500.400.100.30291000
SphynxItaly3100030.000.670.330.6751000
Random B.Italy201000180.170.610.220.53181000

The 446 cats were enrolled in the observatory at random, without any selection, which is why the sample is, in the authors' opinion, very little and therefore, mostly unbiased. The cats were phenotyped by echocardiography (presented in Table 4). HCM was identified in a majority of the feline breeds in the study. HCM was not identified in any of the Birman (n = 8), Scottish Fold (n = 2), or Sphynx (n = 10) cats sampled. The 1 Devon Rex was considered equivocal (borderline). In affected breeds, prevalence ranged from 2.9% in Ragdolls (95% CI = 2.7–8.6%) to 16.7% in Bengals (95% CI = 13.2–46.5%). Random-bred cats from Italy had a prevalence of 15.4% (95% CI = 1.5–29.3%) and Maine Coon cats had a prevalence of 10.1% (95% CI = 5.8–14.3%). All 3 Persians enrolled were affected. Cats having equivocal examinations (n = 46) were excluded from the following analysis.

Table 4. HCM ultrasound (US) results, cats classified by breed and by agea
  Bengal Birman British Shorthair Devon Rex Italian Random Bred Maine Coon
  N.7 N.8 N.19 N.1 N.37 N.232
 Age class Age class Age class Age class Age class Age class
  1. a

    Age class 0 ≤ 12 months, class 1 = ranging 13–24 months; class 2 = group 25–36 months; class 3 = 37–48 months; class 4 = 49–60 months; class 5 ≥ 61 months.

US class 012345 012345 012345 012345 012345 012345
Healthy 32     114 11  4103           39118 3595361436
Border Line  1             1        1    23 24 694311
Mild  1                             1 1  22123
Moderate                                  1 111   
Severe                 1                1  21111
                                           
  

Norwegian Forest cat

N.35

 

Persian

N.3

 

Ragdoll

N.37

 

Scottish Fold

N.2

 

Siberian

N.55

 

Sphynx

N.10

 Age class Age class Age class Age class Age class Age class
US class 012345 012345 012345 012345 012345 012345
Healthy  59655        5156331   1 1  514153212 13 131
Border Line   11           12           1    1    1  
Mild   1 12      1  1            1            
Moderate             1                            
Severe             1                    1       

When echocardiographic results were associated with age and genotype at A31P site (Maine Coon cats; Fig 1A), a progressive and rapid increase in incidence of HCM in the homozygous mutants (n = 12) was identified and all 4 cats older than 36 months of age were affected (Fig 1A). The penetrance in heterozygous Maine Coons was low (0.08) and lower than in homozygous mutants (0.58), but higher than in wild-type homozygotes (0.05). Meta-analysis identified a similar penetrance in C/C cats (0.59) and in homozygous wild-type cats (0.058), but doubled the risk of HCM in C/G cats (0.10), and the average age of onset of HCM is still not determined for these heterozygotes. In our sample, more than 80% of the heterozygous cats remained healthy at least until 4 years of age and the percentage of healthy heterozygous cats remained higher than 50% after 5 years. However, only a few cats in our study exceeded 4 years of age and the average age of onset of HCM could not be determined.

image

Figure 1. A. Percentage of mismatches between genotypes and expected ultrasound results by age class. Mismatch occurs when ultrasound result is not consistent with genotype under the hypothesis of a dominant causative effect on HCM of MYBPC3 allele C at A31P locus. Below is the total number by genotypes at each age class. B. Percentage of mismatches between genotypes and expected ultrasound results by age class. Mismatch occurs when ultrasound result is not consistent with genotype under the hypothesis of a dominant causative effect on HCM of MYBPC3 allele A at A74T locus. Below is the total number by genotypes at each age class.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Two male wild-type cats (G/G) in age-classes 1 and 2 (Fig 1A) had severe HCM. There were also 3 wild-type cats, 1 in age-class = 4 and 2 in age-class = 5 that were mildly affected.

Echocardiographic findings were not associated with age or genotype for the A74T polymorphism (Fig 1B).

Analysis of the association among affected cats and genotype at A31P, A74T, and both loci was performed only in Maine Coons, because this was the largest breed sampled and because A31P is exclusive to this breed. We evaluated 208 Maine Coons – 189 healthy and 19 affected; 7 homozygous mutants, 5 heterozygotes, and 7 homozygous wild types (Table 5A). Significantly, different effects were identified between C/C and G/G genotypes for the echocardiographic phenotype (affected versus. unaffected). The OR for a cat homozygous for the A31P mutation to have HCM was 26.4 (95% CI 6.7–104; Fisher <0.0001). The sensitivity was low (50%), but specificity was high, 96% (CI .0.91–98) for cats of all ages. When a meta-analysis was done using 335 cats (151 cats from this study population and 184 cats from previously published studies[19, 23]), this significant effect was confirmed (OR 23.7; 95% CI = 8.9–62.7; Fisher ≤0.00019), Table 5A. However, Maine Coon heterozygotes for the A31P mutation had a much lower OR for developing HCM (OR 1.81; 95% CI 0.55–5.97), as supported by the meta-analysis on 433 cats (196 cats from this study population and 237 cats from previously published studies (OR 1.82; 95% CI 0.84–3.90, Table 5A).[33, 24] When comparing homozygous mutants with pooled heterozygous and wild-type cats, the OR remained high (OR 21.46; 95% CI 5.93–77.8; Fisher ≤0.0001) (Table 5A). Also, sex showed a significant effect (OR 5.95; 95% CI 1.93–18.65; Fisher ≤0.0007) with males more frequently affected (Table 5C).

Table 5. Odd ratio (OR) between hyprtrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), ultrasound (US) status (borderline cats excluded) and A31P–A74T variants (C = Cytosine; G = Guanine; A = Adenine) and gender in Maine Coons (MCO)
   Geno typeC/CvsG/GG/CvsG/GC/C + G/CvsG/GC/CvsG/C + G/G
AMCOPheno- typeC/CG/CG/GTotOR95 CI TotOR95 CITotOR95 CI ORTotOR95 CI OR
  1. a

    Meta-analysis with data from Mary and Wess.

  2. b

    Meta-analysis with data from Wess. A31P; C mutant allele, G wild type allele.

 A31PHealthy55213215126.46.66–04.581961.810.55–5.972083.961.48–10.6020821.465.92–77.80
  HCM757 Fisher exact t.0.000007 Fisher exact t. 0.246 Fisher exact t. 0.0049 Fisher exact t. 0.00001
 A31PaHealthy910829533523.678.937–62.704331.820.849–3.9054553.501.841–6.65845519.407.676–49.04
  HCM131218 Fisher exact t.7.44e-10 Fisher exact t.0.091 Fisher exact t.0.0001 Fisher exact t.2.084e-9
   Geno typeA/AvsG/GG/AvsG/GA/A + G/AvsG/GG/G + G/AvsA/A
BMCOPhenotypeA/AG/AG/GTotOR95 CI ORTotOR95 CI ORTotOR95 CI ORTotOR95 CI OR
 A74THealthy2571091225.540.45–65.491800.760.22–2.541830.9230.30–2.821835.9280.50–69.51
 HCM1410 Fisher exact t.0.248 Fisher exact t.0.453 Fisher exact t.0.566 Fisher exact t.0.227
 A74THealthy6751541794.8121.09–21.102531.0260.42–2.502621.3070.57–2.942624.7701.12–20.30
 bHCM3816 Fisher exact t.0.056 Fisher exact t.0.559 Fisher exact t.0.327 Fisher exact t.0.053
   GenderMales vs Females         
          
CMCOPhenotypeMF TotOR95 CI OR         
  Healthy73116 2085.951.93–18.65         
  HCM154 Fisher exact t.0.0007         

No statistically significant association between genotype and HCM was identified for the A74T putative-mutation in either the samples in this study, or by meta-analysis (Table 5B), in part because the number of homozygous cats was low. The covariability in A31P and A74T was considered; however, not all combinations of genotypes were available in the sample: only wildtype-wildtype and heterozygous-heterozygous or heterozygous-homozygous cats at A31P and A74T, respectively, were within the dataset, but no significant effects were identified (data not shown).

The R820W mutant allele was exclusive to Ragdolls (Table 2). Statistical analysis of the association between HCM and genotype at this locus was not possible as only 37 cats were examined (33 healthy, 3 equivocal (borderline) and 1 mildly affected, Table 4).

A smaller cohort of 203 cats, examined echocardiographically, was evaluated in the 2 larger amplicons (442 and 396 bp) for additional polymorphisms (Table 6). Variability was mainly in the exon 2 region flanking A74T (positions 175, 186, 222), suggesting a less conserved domain (Fig 2). All additional polymorphisms had no breed specificity and an OR was not calculated because of low sample size.

Table 6. Multiple nucleotide sequence alignment of cat MYBPC3 including mutations implicated in HCM. Nucleotide positions refer to cat genome sequence at Ensambl # ENSFCAG00000002530. US = ultrasoundThumbnail image of
image

Figure 2. Model of the structure of the 1st domain of protein MYBPC3 in wild type form (green) and of the polymorphic forms, A31P (blue) and A74T (magenta). The protein backbone is represented as ribbon, and the beta strands as flat arrows. Residues 31 and 74 of polymorphic forms are shown in stick representation. The picture was made using PyMOL Molecular Graphics System.

Download figure to PowerPoint

A functional analysis of each mutation was performed using a different approach than previous studies. The experimental structure of the feline protein is not available, but the wild-type forms of the first domain and of the human MYBPC3 share more than 90% sequence identity. Therefore, the structure of the human protein is a reliable starting point to model the structure of the feline protein using a comparative modeling protocol. Ten models were created and the best one in terms of stereochemical quality of the protein and energetics of the structure was chosen for the following steps. Mutations A74T and A31P were modeled using the “Mutate_model” script because this procedure gave the best results for side-chain placement.[34] It appears that the A31P mutation affects a residue located in the middle of a beta-strand forming the central beta-sheet of the protein. The replacement of alanine with proline causes no predicted effects on solvent accessibility and potential salt bridge networks in this zone. However, the mutation is predicted to alter the secondary structures causing the interruption, and then the shortening, of the beta-strand in the core of the protein (Fig 2, blue). In addition, this mutation impairs the formation of an H-bond involving residue 31 and His64. These two structural effects are potentially able to disrupt the overall fold and stability of the protein. This is in agreement with the decreased stability predicted for this mutant by the server PoPMusIC. On the contrary, A74T SNP seems not to alter any structural feature, such as H-bonds or salt bridge patterns, secondary structures or solvent accessibility, or overall stability of the protein. However, because it is located on the external part of the protein (Fig 2, magenta), it could disrupt the interaction that MYBPC3 protein might have with other proteins or structures.

Discussion

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. References

This study focused on elucidating the effect of the A31P and A74T genotypic variants in feline MYBPC3 on HCM development using a wide sample of pedigree and random-bred domestic cats. Humans carrying mutations in MYBPC3 develop a broad spectrum of HCM phenotypes, and heterozygotes frequently do not have echocardiographic evidence of HCM until they are in their fifth or sixth decade of life. This reduced and age-related penetrance has been speculated to be the result of the function of the protein itself in the sarcomere, as well as complex and multiple factors such as modifier genes, environmental effects, epigenetic factors, or both.[35] Similarly, our study confirms that Maine Coon heterozygotes for the MYBPC3-A31P mutation usually lack echocardiographic evidence of HCM when young to middle-aged.[18, 19] However, this study also demonstrated that Maine Coons homozygous for the A31P mutation usually develop HCM and almost all do by the time they are middle-aged. These results were strengthened and corroborated by performing a meta-analysis using data from previous studies.[17, 19, 23]

In the past few years, the prevalence of the A31P mutation in Maine Coons has been recorded in different countries and its frequency varies by geographic area.[17-19, 23] The prevalence ranges from moderately high in Germany (22%[19]), Asia (30.9%[17]), and North America (22.5% present work and 31.7%[17]) to high in Italy and France, (38.2% present work and 41.5%[23]) to even higher in Australia – New Zealand (46.3%[17]). No data are available on the prevalence of R820W in Ragdolls. The A74T was confirmed as a multi-breed polymorphism and was found in 8 of the 10 analyzed breeds, even in some breeds where the number of cats was extremely low,[19] and in random-bred cats. The A74T genotypic frequency (35%) in Italian Maine Coons is in accordance with another previous study in Germany.[33]

In this study, a large sample of cats from different breeds was genotyped to determine the allelic and genotypic frequencies at MYBPC3 loci A31P, A74T, and R820W. A31P and R820W were confirmed as exclusive mutations in the Maine Coons and Ragdolls, respectively, in this study. Because the two mutations are exclusive to these 2 breeds, they likely occurred after breed development, which is recent for the Ragdoll, but substantially longer ago for the Maine Coon, which have existed since the beginning of feline breeding in the USA in the early 1900s. The A74T was found in a large number of purebred and random-bred cats and so appears to be a nonspecific polymorphism in cats.

Based on this study and previous studies, the Maine Coon A31P heterozygotes usually lack evidence of HCM during the years at which they would most commonly be bred. Even homozygotes for the A31P mutation might not have evidence of HCM until they are closer to middle age. Consequently, echocardiographic screening, especially of young cats, should not be the sole diagnostic to identify HCM-potential cats because genetic screening is needed to identify cats with the HCM-associated mutations. At the very least, Maine Coon breeders should genotype their cats to make sure they are not breeding heterozygous to heterozygous cats and thereby producing cats homozygote for the A31P mutation.

The cats from Italy in this study (n = 446) underwent echocardiographic evaluation and were recruited by interacting with breed associations that encouraged all their members to enroll their cats. Cats were enrolled in the observatory randomly, without any preselection – suggesting, in the authors' opinion, that the sampling is largely unbiased. However, the assessments were likely slightly biased toward the evaluation of affected cats and cats at risk because they were chosen by breeders. This would inflate the calculated allele frequency in the populations. The same bias likely exists in other studies as breeders generally only screen their important breeding cats and cats known to be at risk to save costs. However, the encouragement of participation by the observatory may have alleviated some bias as the majority of the participating owners volunteered to test their cats without any priority criterion.

There was a high and statistically significant correlation between the MYBPC3-A31P mutation and the phenotype of disease in homozygous mutant Maine Coons. This strongly supports the hypothesis that the mutation confers a significant risk of disease. The study also showed that penetrance was related to age in the homozygous mutant cats as some of the cats that were younger than 36 months of age did not have echocardiographic evidence of HCM, whereas all the recruited cats that were older than 36 months were affected.

The results in this study are similar to those of studies of humans with MYBPC3 mutations, with regard to the onset of detectable disease and disease severity. Humans with HCM caused by a MYBPC3 mutation (approximately 30% of the total known HCM mutations) have a milder phenotype with less hypertrophy and fewer T-wave abnormalities, have a later onset of HCM, and have a lower penetrance compared with those caused by beta myosin heavy chain and troponin T gene mutations.[36] Also prognosis and life expectancy are generally better than that observed among cats with HCM caused by mutations in other sarcomeric genes.[37, 38]

MYBPC3-A74T genotype-phenotype correlation in Maine Coons was not statistically significant, strongly suggesting that it is a polymorphism, not a risk-associated mutation, consistent with previous studies.[19] However, the number of homozygotes for this SNP in this study was too few to make any definitive conclusions regarding its ability to cause HCM. The covariability in A31P and A74T was examined; however, not all combinations of genotypes were available in the sampled cats. Particularly, cats showing genotypes P/P at A31P and T/T at A74T were missing in the sampling (data not shown).

An evaluation of the potential impact of the amino acid substitutions caused by A31P and A74T by the computer program PolyPhen did not suggest damaging effects on the protein, according to Wess.[19] The 2 polymorphisms, located within the 0–2 motif, are in a very external position and one could interact with titin and the other with actin.[39] At the protein level, our analysis suggest that the A31P is able to perturb the overall fold and stability of the protein and so the mutation can cause HCM. To the contrary, A74T, also located externally, seems not to alter any structural feature of cMYBPC. However, it could potentially disturb the interaction that the protein might have with other proteins or interactors.

Similar to previous reports,[19] we found Maine Coons with HCM that did not have the A31P mutation, suggesting at least 1 other cause of HCM in this breed.

Feline breeders and some clinicians debate whether to call HCM in Maine Coons caused by the A31P mutation an autosomal dominant or autosomal recessive trait. In the original description of HCM in Maine Coons, the disease appeared to behave as an autosomal dominant trait. This, however, in the opinion of the authors, was in a colony of research cats that were likely to have been even more inbred than any particular line of Maine Coons from a breeder.[7] This inbreeding likely produced a high percentage of homozygous mutant genotypes. An alternative explanation (unpublished data) is that this group of cats had a higher prevalence of a modifying gene or possibly even another HCM-causing gene, because it is known that cats without the A31P mutation also developed HCM in this colony. Although calling a heritable disease autosomal recessive or dominant with decreased penetrance may be largely semantics, the mutation is in a gene that encodes for a structural protein and this form of mutation usually causes an autosomal dominant mode of transmission. When structural proteins are affected, often only half the protein must be dysfunctional for disease to occur.[40, 41] However, in the case of MYBPC3, although it is a structural protein, the sarcomere apparently can function without any normal protein, because A31P and R820W homozygous mutant cats do not die in utero. Therefore, it is possible for a mutation in a gene that encodes for a structural protein to behave more like an autosomal recessive trait. However, autosomal recessive traits more commonly show up in young animals and are less likely to show variable expression. Therefore, HCM in Maine Coon cats caused by the A31P mutation more likely should be theoretically considered an autosomal dominant trait, with decreased penetrance.

Acknowledgments

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. References

We thank the Osservatorio Italiano HCM (www.osservatoriohcm.com), particularly A. Cala DVM, A. Pini, DVM, and A. Bellemo DVM for the accurate technical help. We thank Mr. E. Figini and the Maine Coon Club d'Italia, for the great proactiveness and support, ANFI and all the breeders who enrolled their cats and made this work possible. We thank Mr P. Valiati and all members of Laboratorio di Genetica Molecolare DSA-UNIMI, and Vetogene very much for great technical support and help. We also thank Jennifer Kurushima, PhD, and various members of the Lyons laboratory with providing the Illumina genotyping data. A. Marabotti and L. Milanesi are supported by MIUR FIRB ITALBIONET (RBPR05ZK2Z and RBIN064YAT_003), flagship project InterOmics. This research was funded by UNIMI-PUR 2009 and to L. Lyons from the National Center for Research Resources R24 RR016094 and is currently supported by the Office of Research Infrastructure Programs/OD R24OD010928.

Conflict of Interest Declaration: Authors disclose no conflict of interest.

Footnotes
  1. 1

    GEHealthcare UK limited, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK

  2. 2

    Qiagen srl, Milan, Italy

  3. 3

    Life Technologies, Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA

  4. 4

    Promega Corporation, Fitchburg, WI

  5. 5

    Illumina Inc, San Diego, CA

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. References