SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Angelstam, P.K. & Kuuluvainen, T. 2004. Boreal forest disturbance regimes, successional dynamics and landscape structures – a European perspective. Ecological Bulletins 51: 117136.
  • Austin, M.P. 1977. Use of ordination and other multivariate descriptive methods to study succession. Vegetatio 35: 165175.
  • Barden, L.S. 1989. Repeatability in forest gap research: studies in the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecology 70: 558559.
  • Berg, S. & Lundqvist, P.-U. 1965. Vegetationsundersökning och synpunkter på Fibyskogens utvecklingshidtoria och dess värde som naturreservat. Preliminär sammanställning av data för examensarbete i ämnet skogsbotanik utfört sommaren 1964. Mimeographed report. Royal School of Forestry, Stockholm.
  • Bogushevsky, V. 1912. Apropos of article by Rozhkov, forest inventory in the northern forests [Po povodu statyi Rozhkova “K ustroystvu severnykh lesov]. Lesnoy Zhurnal 2–3: 299310 (in Russian).
  • Bradshaw, R. & Hannon, G. 1992. Climatic change, human influence and disturbance regime in the control of vegetation dynamics within Fiby Forest, Sweden. Journal of Ecology 80: 625632.
  • Brūmelis, G., Dauškane, I., Ikauniece, S., Javoiša, B., Kalviškis, K., Madžule, L., Matisons, R., Strazdina, L., Tabors, G. & Vimba, E. 2011. Dynamics of natural hemiboreal woodland in the Moricsala Reserve, Latvia: the studies of K. R. Kupffer revisited. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 26 (Suppl. 10): 5464.
  • Coomes, D.A. & Grubbs, P.J. 2000. Impacts of root competition in forests and woodlands: a theoretical framework and review of experiments. Ecological Monographs 70: 171207.
  • Cooper, W.S. 1913. The climax forest of the Isle Royal, Lake Superior, and its development. I. Botanical Gazette 55: 144.
  • Cumming, S.G., Schmiegelow, F.K.A. & Burton, P.J. 2000. Gap dynamics in boreal aspen stands: is the forest older than we think? Ecological Applications 10: 744759.
  • De Grandpré, L. & Bergeron, Y. 1997. Diversity and stability of understorey communities following disturbance in the southern boreal forest. Journal of Ecology 85: 777784.
  • Denslow, J.S. 1987. Tropical rainforest gaps and tree species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 18: 431451.
  • Esseen, P.-A., Ehnström, B., Ericson, L. & Sjöberg, K. 1997. Boreal forests. Ecological Bulletins 46: 1647.
  • Foster, J.R. & Reiners, W.A. 1986. Size distribution and expansion of canopy gaps in a northern Appalachian spruce–fir forest. Vegetatio 68: 109114.
  • Franklin, J.F. & DeBell, D.S. 1988. Thirty-six years of tree population change in an old-growth Pseudotsuga–Tsuga forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18: 633639.
  • Fraver, S., Jonsson, B.G., Jönsson, M. & Esseen, P.-A. 2008. Demographics and disturbance history of a boreal old-growth Picea abies forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 19: 789798.
  • Gromtsev, A. 2002. Natural disturbance dynamics in the boreal forests of European Russia: a review. Silva Fennica 36: 4155.
  • Hallingbäck, T., Hedenäs, L. & Weibull, H. 2006. Ny checklista för Sveriges mosor [New checklist of Swedish bryophytes]. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 100: 96148.
  • Heinselman, M.L. 1973. Fire in the virgin forests of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, Minnesota. Quaternary Research 3: 329382.
  • Hesselman, H. 1935. Fibyskogen och dess utvecklingshistoria [Der Fibywald und seine Entwickelungsgeschichte]. Meddelanden från Statens Skogsförsöksanstalt 28: 525570.
  • Hofgaard, A. 1993a. 50 Years of change in s Swedish boreal old-growth Picea abies forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 4: 773782.
  • Hofgaard, A. 1993b. Structure and regeneration patterns in a virgin Picea abies forest in northern Sweden. Journal of Vegetation Science 4: 601608.
  • Hörnberg, G., Ohlsson, M. & Zackrisson, O. 1995. Stand dynamics, regeneration patterns and long-term continuity in boreal old-growth Picea abies swamp-forests. Journal of Vegetation Science 6: 291298.
  • Hytteborn, H. & Packham, J.R. 1985. Left to nature: forest structure and regeneration in Fiby urskog, central Sweden. Arboricultural Journal 9: 111.
  • Hytteborn, H. & Packham, J.R. 1987. Decay rate of Picea abies logs and the storm gap theory: a re-examination of Sernander plot III, Fiby urskog, central Sweden. Arboricultural Journal 11: 299311.
  • Hytteborn, H. & Verwijst, T. 2011. The importance of gaps and dwarf trees in the regeneration of Swedish spruce forests, the origin and content of Sernander's (1936) gap dynamics theory. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 26(Suppl. 10): 5464.
  • Hytteborn, H., Packham, J.R. & Verwijst, T. 1987. Tree population dynamics, stand structure and species composition in the montane virgin forest of Vallibäcken, northern Sweden. Vegetatio 72: 319.
  • Hytteborn, H., Liu, Q. & Verwijst, T. 1991. Natural disturbance and gap dynamics in a Swedish boreal spruce forest. In: Nakagoshi, N. & Golley, F.B. (eds.) Coniferous forest ecology from an international perspective, pp. 93108. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, NL.
  • Ivashkevich, B.A. 1915. Manchurian forest. Description for the eastern forest concession of the community of Chinese-Eastern railway with the plan of economy [Manchzhurskiy les. Opisaniye Vostochnoy lesnoy kontsessii obschestva Kitaisko-Vostochnoy zheleznoy dorogi i plan khozyaistva na neyo], Issue 1, Harbin (in Russian).
  • Jonsson, B.G. 1990. Treefall disturbance – a factor structuring vegetation in boreal spruce forests. In: Krahulec, F., Agnew, A.D.Q., Agnew, S. & Willems, J.M. (eds.) Spatial processes in plant communities, pp. 8998. SPB, The Hague, NL.
  • Jonsson, B.G. 2000. Availability of coarse woody debris in a boreal old-growth Picea abies forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 11: 5156.
  • Jonsson, B.G. & Dynesius, M. 1993. Uprooting in boreal forests; long-term variation in disturbance rate. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23: 23832388.
  • Jonsson, B.G. & Hofgaard, A. 2011. The structure and regeneration of high-altitude Norway spruce forests: a review of Arnborg (1942, 1943). Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 26(Suppl. 10): 1724.
  • Kneeshaw, D.D. & Bergeron, Y. 1998. Canopy gap characteristics and tree replacement in the southeastern boreal forest. Ecology 79: 783794.
  • Koukoulas, S. & Blackburn, G.A. 2004. Quantifying the spatial properties of forest canopy gaps using LiDAR imagery and GIS. International Journal of Remote Sensing 25: 30493072.
  • Kuuluvainen, T. 1994. Gap disturbance, ground microtopography, and the regeneration dynamics of boreal coniferous forests in Finland: a review. Annales Zoologici Fennici 31: 3551.
  • Kuuluvainen, T. 2002. Introduction. Disturbance dynamics in boreal forests: defining the ecological basis of restoration and management of biodiversity. Silva Fennica 36: 511.
  • Kuuluvainen, T. & Aakala, T. 2011. Natural forest dynamics in boreal Fennoscandia: a review and classification. Silva Fennica 45: 823841.
  • Kuuluvainen, T., Syrjänen, K. & Kalliola, R. 1998. Structure of a pristine Picea abies forest in northeastern Europe. Journal of Vegetation Science 9: 563574.
  • Leemans, R. 1986. Structure of the primeval forest of Fiby. In: Fanta, J. (ed.) Forest dynamics research in Western and Central Europe, pp. 221230. PUDOC, Wageningen, NL.
  • Leemans, R. 1990. Sapling establishment patterns in relation to light gaps in the canopy of two primeval pine–spruce forests in Sweden. In: Krahulec, F., Agnew, A.D.Q., Agnew, S. & Willems, J.H. (eds.) Spatial processes in plant communities, pp. 111120. SPB, The Hague, NL.
  • Leemans, R. 1991. Canopy gaps and establishment patterns of spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) in two old-growth coniferous forests in central Sweden. Vegetatio 93: 157165.
  • Lennartsson, T., Sundberg, S. & Persson, T. 1996. Landskapets förändring Chapter 3 [The changes in the landscape]. In: Fredriksson, R. & Tjernberg, M. (eds.) Upplands fåglar – fåglar, människor och landskap genom 300 år [The birds of Uppland – birds, people and landscape through 300 years], pp. 5190. Upplands ornitologiska förening, Uppsala.
  • Lertzman, K.P. & Krebs, C.J. 1991. Gap-phase structure of a subalpine old-growth forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20: 17301741.
  • Lid, J. & Lid, D.T. 2005. Norsk flora, 7th ed. Revised by R. Elven. Det Norska Samlaget, Oslo.
  • Lieberman, M., Lieberman, D. & Peralta, R. 1989. Forests are not just Swiss cheese: canopy stereogeometry of non-gaps in tropical forests. Ecology 70: 550552.
  • Linder, P. 1998. Structural changes in two virgin boreal forest stands in central Sweden over 72 years. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 13: 451461.
  • Liu, Q. & Hytteborn, H. 1989. Storm-gap dynamics and regeneration in the spruce forest of Fiby urskog. Studies in Plant Ecology 18: 162164.
  • Liu, Q. & Hytteborn, H. 1991. Characteristics of gap structure, disturbance and forest reaction in Fiby urskog, a primeval Norway spruce forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 2: 391402.
  • McCarthy, J. 2001. Gap dynamics of forest trees: a review with particular attention to boreal forests. Environmental Reviews 9: 159.
  • Nilsson, C., Stjernquist, I., Bärring, L., Schlyter, P., Jönsson, A.M. & Samuelsson, H. 2004. Recorded storm damage in Swedish forests 1901–2000. Forest Ecology and Management 199: 165173.
  • Peterken, G.F. & Jones, E.W. 1987. Forty years of change in Lady Park Wood: the old-growth stands. Journal of Ecology 75: 477512.
  • Peterken, G.F. & Jones, E.W. 1989. Forty years of change in Lady Park Wood: the young-growth stands. Journal of Ecology 77: 401429.
  • Petrițan, I.C., von Lüpke, B. & Petrițan, A.M. 2011. Effects of root trenching of overstorey Norway spruce (Picea abies) on growth and biomass of underplanted beech (Fagus sylvatica) and Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) saplings. European Journal of Forest Research 130: 813828.
  • Pickett, S.T.A. & White, P.S. (eds.) 1985. The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, London, UK.
  • Platt, W.J. & Strong, D.R. (eds.) 1989. Gaps in forest ecology. Special feature. Ecology 70: 535576.
  • Runkle, J.R. 1981. Gap regeneration in some old-growth forests of the eastern United States. Ecology 62: 10411051.
  • Runkle, J.R. & Yetter, T.C. 1987. Treefalls revisited: gap dynamics in the southern Appalachians. Ecology 68: 417424.
  • Schliemann, S.A. & Bockheim, J.G. 2011. Methods for studying treefall gaps: A review. Forest Ecology and Management 261: 11431151.
  • Sernander, R. 1936. Granskär och Fiby urskog. The primitive forest of Granskär and Fiby: a study of the part played by storm-gaps and dwarf trees in the regeneration of the Swedish spruce forest, pp 220–227. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 8: 1232.
  • Sheil, D., Burslem, D.F.R.P. & Alder, D. 1995. The interpretation and misinterpretation of mortality rate measures. Journal of Ecology 83: 331333.
  • Shorohova, E., Kuuluvainen, T., Kangur, A. & Jõgiste, K. 2009. Natural stand structures, disturbance regimes and successional dynamics in the Eurasian boreal forests: a review with special references to Russian studies. Annals of Forest Science 66: 213232.
  • Sjörs, H. 1963. Amphi-atlantic zonation, nemoral to Arctic. In: Löve, Á. & Löve, D. (eds.) North Atlantic Biota and their history, pp. 109125. Pergamon Press, London, UK.
  • Skarpe, C., Hytteborn, H. & Cramer, W. 1989. Femtio års skogs utveckling på Granskär, norra Uppland. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 83: 177185.
  • Skvortsova, E.B., Ulanova, N.G. & Basevich, V.F. 1983. Ekologitcheskaya Rol' Vetrovalov [Ecological role of windfalls]. Lesnaya promyshlennost, Moscow, RU (in Russian).
  • Thomas, P.A. & Packham, J.R. 2007. Ecology of woodlands and forests. Description, dynamics and diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Ulanova, N.G. 2000. The effect of windthrow on forests at different spatial scales: a review. Forest Ecology and Management 135: 155167.
  • Veblen, T.T. 1985. Forest development in tree-fall gaps in the temperate rain forests of Chile. National Geographic Research 1: 162183.
  • Vepakomma, U., Kneeshaw, D. & St-Onge, B. 2010. Interactions of multiple disturbance in shaping boreal forest dynamics: a spatially explicit analysis using multi-temporal lidar data and high-resolution imagery. Journal of Ecology 98: 526530.
  • Vepakomma, U., Kneeshaw, D. & Fortin, M.-J. 2012. Spatial contiguity and continuity of canopy gaps in mixed wood boreal forests: persistence, expansion, shrinkage and displacement. Journal of Ecology 100: 12571268.
  • White, P.S., MacKenzie, M.D. & Busing, R.T. 1985. Natural disturbance and gap phase dynamics in southern Appalachian spruce–fir forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 15: 233240.
  • Whitmore, T.C. 1984. Gap size and species richness in tropical rain forests. Biotropica 16: 239.
  • Whitmore, T.C. 1989. Canopy gaps and the two major groups of forest trees. Ecology 70: 536538.
  • Worrall, J.J., Lee, T.D. & Harrington, T.C. 2005. Forest dynamics and agents that initiate and expand canopy gaps in Picea–Abies forests of Crawford Notch, New Hampshire, USA. Journal of Ecology 93: 178190.