SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 63, 129.
  • Barth, F.G. (2001). A spider's world: senses and behavior. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Bradbury, J.W. & Vehrencamp, S.L. (2011). Principles of animal communication. 2nd edn. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
  • Brady, T.F., Konkle, T. & Alvarez, G.A. (2011). A review of visual memory capacity: beyond individual items and toward structured representations. J. Vis. 11, 134.
  • Burge, T. (2010). Origins of objectivity. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Cartmill, E.A. & Byrne, R.W. (2007). Orangutans modify their gestural signaling according to their audience's comprehension. Curr. Biol. 17, 13451348.
  • Christy, J.H. (1995). Mimicry, mate choice, and the sensory trap hypothesis. Am. Nat. 146, 171181.
  • Curio, E. (1976). The ethology of predation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Damasio, A.R. (1994). Descartes’ error: emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: Harper Collins.
  • Dawkins, R. & Krebs, J.R. (1978). Animal signals: information or manipulation? In Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach: 282309. Krebs, J.R. & Davies, N.B. (Eds). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
  • Dennett, D.C. (1996). Kinds of minds: towards an understanding of consciousness. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Descartes, R. (1637/1994). Discourse on the method (G. Heffernan, Trans.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Eberhard, W.G. (1977). Aggressive chemical mimicry by a bolas spider. Science 198, 11731175.
  • Eberhard, W.G. (2011). Are smaller animals behaviourally limited? Lack of clear constraints in miniature spiders. Anim. Behav. 81, 813823.
  • Eberhard, W.G. & Wcislo, W.T. (2012). Plenty of room at the bottom? Am. Sci. 100, 226233.
  • Elgar, M.A. (1992). Sexual cannibalism in spiders and other invertebrates. In Cannibalism: ecology and evolution among diverse taxa: 128155. Elgar, M.A. & Crespi, B.J. (Eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Endler, J.A. & Basolo, A.L. (1998). Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 415420.
  • Epstein, R. (1982). Representation: a concept that fills no gaps. Behav. Brain Sci. 5, 377378.
  • Gallistel, C.R. (1989). Animal cognition: the representation of space, time and number. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 40, 155189.
  • Gemeno, C., Yeargan, K.V. & Haynes, K.F. (2000). Aggressive chemical mimicry by the bolas spider Mastophora hutchinsoni: identification and quantification of a major prey's sex pheromone components in the spider's volatile emissions. J. Chem. Ecol. 26, 12351243.
  • Guilford, T. & Dawkins, M.S. (1991). Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals. Anim. Behav. 42, 114.
  • Hagman, M., Phillips, B.L. & Shine, R. (2008). Tails of enticement: caudal luring by an ambush foraging snake (Acanthophis praelongus, Elapidae). Funct. Ecol. 22, 11341139.
  • Harland, D.P. & Jackson, R.R. (2004). Portia perceptions: the Umwelt of an araneophagic jumping spider. In Complex worlds from simpler nervous systems: 540. Prete, F.R. (Ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Harland, D.P. & Jackson, R.R. (2006). A knife in the back: use of prey-specific attack tactics by araneophagic jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae). J. Zool. 269, 285290.
  • Harland, D.P., Li, D. & Jackson, R.R. (2012). How jumping spiders see the world. In How animals see the world: comparative behavior, biology, and evolution of vision: 133164. Lazareva, O. , Shimizu, T. & Wasserman, E.A. (Eds). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Hauser, M.D. (1997). Minding the behaviour of deception. In Machiavellian Intelligence II: extensions and evaluations: 112143. Whiten, A. & Byrne, R.W. (Eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Haynes, K.F., Gemeno, C., Yeargan, K.V., Millar, J.G. & Johnson, K.M. (2002). Aggressive chemical mimicry of moth pheromones by a bolas spider: how does this specialist predator attract more than one species of prey? Chemoecology 12, 99105.
  • Heatwole, H. & Davison, E. (1976). A review of caudal luring in snakes with notes on its occurrence in the Saharan sand viper, Cerastes vipera. Herpetologica 32, 332336.
  • Herberstein, M.E. & Wignall, A.E. (2011). Deceptive signals in spiders. In Spider behaviour: flexibility and versatility: 190214. Herberstein, M.E. (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jabłoński, P.G. (2001). Sensory exploitation of prey: manipulation of the initial direction of prey escapes by a conspicuous ‘rare enemy’. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 208, 10171022.
  • Jabłoński, P.G. & Strausfeld, N.J. (2000). Exploitation of an ancient escape circuit by an avian predator: prey sensitivity to model of predator. Brain Behav. Evol. 56, 94106.
  • Jabłoński, P.G. & Strausfeld, N.J. (2001). Exploitation of an ancient escape circuit by an avian predator: relationship between taxon-specific prey escape circuits and the sensitivity to visual cues from the predator. Brain Behav. Evol. 58, 218240.
  • Jackson, R.R. (1985). The biology of Euryattus sp. indet., a web-building jumping spider (Araneae, Salticidae) from Queensland: utilization of silk, predatory behaviour, and intraspecific interactions. J. Zool. Lond. B 1, 145173.
  • Jackson, R.R. (1986). Web building, predatory versatility, and the evolution of the Salticidae. In Spiders: webs, behavior, and evolution: 232268. Shear, W.A. (Ed.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Jackson, R.R. (1992). Eight-legged tricksters: spiders that specialize at catching other spiders. Bioscience 42, 590598.
  • Jackson, R.R. & Blest, A.D. (1982). The biology of Portia fimbriata, a web-building jumping spider (Araneae, Salticidae) from Queensland: utilization of webs and predatory versatility. J. Zool. (Lond.) 196, 255293.
  • Jackson, R.R. & Cross, F.R. (2011). Spider cognition. Adv. Insect Physiol. 41, 115174.
  • Jackson, R.R. & Hallas, S.E.A. (1986). Comparative biology of Portia africana, P. albimana, P. fimbriata, P. labiata and P. schultzi, araneophagic, web-building jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae): utilisation of webs, predatory versatility, and intraspecific interactions. N. Z. J. Zool. 13, 423489.
  • Jackson, R.R. & Nelson, X.J. (2011). Reliance on trial-and-error signal derivation by Portia africana, an araneophagic jumping spider from East Africa. J. Ethol. 29, 301307.
  • Jackson, R.R. & Pollard, S.D. (1997). Jumping spider mating strategies: sex among cannibals in and out of webs. In The evolution of mating systems in insects and arachnids: 340351. Choe, J.C. & Crespi, B.J. (Eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jackson, R.R. & Wilcox, R.S. (1990). Aggressive mimicry, prey-specific predatory behaviour and predator recognition in the predator-prey interactions of Portia fimbriata and Euryattus sp., jumping spiders from Queensland. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26, 111119.
  • Jackson, R.R. & Wilcox, R.S. (1993a). Spider flexibly chooses aggressive mimicry signals for different prey by trial and error. Behaviour 127, 2136.
  • Jackson, R.R. & Wilcox, R.S. (1993b). Observations in nature of detouring behaviour by Portia fimbriata, a web-invading aggressive mimic jumping spider from Queensland. J. Zool. (Lond.) 230, 135139.
  • Jackson, R.R. & Wilcox, R.S. (1998). Spider-eating spiders. Am. Sci. 86, 350357.
  • Jackson, R.R., Li, D., Fijn, N. & Barrion, A. (1998). Predator-prey interactions between aggressive-mimic jumping spiders (Salticidae) and araneophagic spitting spiders (Scytodidae) from the Philippines. J. Insect Behav. 11, 319342.
  • Jackson, R.R., Pollard, S.D., Li, D. & Fijn, N. (2002). Interpopulation variation in the risk-related decisions of Portia labiata, an araneophagic jumping spider (Araneae, Salticidae), during predatory sequences with spitting spiders. Anim. Cogn. 5, 215223.
  • Jakob, E.M., Skow, C.D. & Long, S. (2011). Plasticity, learning and cognition. In Spider behaviour: flexibility and versatility: 307347. Herberstein, M.E. (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jurado, M.B. & Rosselli, M. (2007). The elusive nature of executive functions: a review of our current understanding. Neuropsychol. Rev. 17, 213233.
  • Kosslyn, S.M., Ganis, G. & Thompson, W.L. (2003). Mental imagery: against the nihilistic hypothesis. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 109111.
  • Krebs, J.R. & Dawkins, R. (1984). Animal signals: mind-reading and manipulation. In Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. 2nd edn: 380402. Krebs, J.R. & Davies, N.B. (Eds). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
  • Land, M.F. & Nilsson, D.-E. (2012). Animal eyes. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Landolfa, M.A. & Barth, F.G. (1996). Vibrations in the orb web of the spider Nephila clavipes: cues for discrimination and orientation. J. Comp. Physiol. [A] 179, 493508.
  • Leal, M. & Thomas, R. (1994). Notes on the feeding behavior and caudal luring by juvenile Alsophis portoricensis (Serpentes: Colubridae). J. Herpetol. 28, 126128.
  • Li, D. & Jackson, R.R. (2003). A predator's preference for egg-carrying prey: a novel cost of parental care. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 55, 129136.
  • Li, D., Jackson, R.R. & Barrion, A. (1999). Parental and predatory behaviour of Scytodes sp., an araneophagic spitting spider (Araneae: Scytodidae) from the Philippines. J. Zool. (Lond.) 247, 293310.
  • Markman, A.B. & Dietrich, E. (2000). In defense of representation. Cognit. Psychol. 40, 138171.
  • Masters, W.M., Markl, H.S. & Moffat, A.M. (1986). Transmission of vibrations in a spider's web. In Spiders: webs, behavior, and evolution: 4969. Shear, W.A. (Ed.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Maunsell, J.H.R. (1995). The brain's visual world: representation of visual targets in cerebral cortex. Science 270, 764768.
  • Minsky, M. (1986). The society of mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Mitchell, R.W. (1986). A framework for discussing deception. In Deception: perspectives on human and nonhuman deceit: 340. Mitchell, R.W. & Thompson, N.S. (Eds). Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Neill, W.T. (1960). The caudal lure of various juvenile snakes. Q. J. Fla. Acad. Sci. 23, 173200.
  • Neiworth, J.J. & Rilling, M.E. (1987). A method for studying imagery in animals. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 13, 203214.
  • Nelson, X.J. & Jackson, R.R. (2011). Flexibility in the foraging strategies of spiders. In Spider behaviour: flexibility and versatility: 3156. Herberstein, M.E. (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nelson, X.J., Garnett, D.T. & Evans, C.S. (2010). Receiver psychology and the design of the deceptive caudal luring signal of the death adder. Anim. Behav. 79, 555561.
  • Pietsch, T.W. & Grobecker, D.B. (1978). The compleat angler: aggressive mimicry in an antennariid anglerfish. Science 201, 369370.
  • Postle, B.R. (2006). Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain. Neuroscience 139, 2338.
  • Pough, F.H. (1988). Mimicry and related phenomena. In Biology of the Reptilia: 153234, Vol. 16. Gans, C. & Huey, R.B. (Eds). New York: Alan R Liss.
  • Proctor, H.C. (1992). Sensory exploitation and the evolution of male mating behaviour: a cladistic test using water mites (Acari: Parasitengona). Anim. Behav. 44, 745752.
  • Pylyshyn, Z.W. (2003a). Explaining mental imagery: now you see it, now you don't. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 111112.
  • Pylyshyn, Z.W. (2003b). Return of the mental image: are there really pictures in the brain? Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 113118.
  • Reiserer, R.S. (2002). Stimulus control of caudal luring and other feeding responses: a program for research on visual perception in vipers. In Biology of the vipers: 361383. Schuett, G.W. , Höggren, M. , Douglas, M.E. & Greene, H.W. (Eds). Eagle Mountain: Eagle Mountain Publishing.
  • Reiserer, R.S. & Schuett, G.W. (2008). Aggressive mimicry in neonates of the sidewinder rattlesnake, Crotalus cerastes (Serpentes: Viperidae): stimulus control and visual perception of prey luring. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 95, 8191.
  • Ryan, M.J., Fox, J.H., Wilcynski, W. & Rand, A.S. (1990). Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus. Nature 343, 6667.
  • Sazima, I. (1991). Caudal luring in two neotropical pitvipers Bothrops jararaca and B. jararacussu. Copeia 1991, 245248.
  • Schaefer, H.M. & Ruxton, G.D. (2009). Deception in plants: mimicry or perceptual exploitation? Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 676685.
  • Scharff, N. & Coddington, J.A. (1997). A phylogenetic analysis of the orb-weaving spider family Araneidae (Arachnida, Araneae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 120, 355434.
  • Schneider, J.M. & Andrade, M.C.B. (2011). Mating behaviour and sexual selection. In Spider behaviour: flexibility and versatility: 215274. Herberstein, M.E. (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schneider, J.M. & Lubin, Y. (1998). Intersexual conflict in spiders. Oikos 83, 496506.
  • Shettleworth, S.J. (2009). Cognition, evolution, and behavior. 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Smith, W.J. (1977). The behavior of communicating. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Soley, F.G. & Taylor, P.W. (2012). Araneophagic assassin bugs choose routes that minimize risk of detection by web-building spiders. Anim. Behav. 84, 315321.
  • Soley, F.G., Jackson, R.R. & Taylor, P.W. (2011). Biology of Stenolemus giraffa (Hemiptera: Reduviidae), a web invading, araneophagic assassin bug from Australia. N. Z. J. Zool. 38, 297316.
  • Srinivasan, M.V. (2010). Honey bees as a model for vision, perception, and cognition. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55, 267284.
  • Stowe, M.K., Tumlinson, J.H. & Heath, R.R. (1987). Chemical mimicry- bolas spiders emit components of moth prey species sex pheromones. Science 236, 964967.
  • Su, K.F.Y., Meier, R., Jackson, R.R., Harland, D.P. & Li, D. (2007). Convergent evolution of eye ultrastructure and divergent evolution of vision-mediated predatory behaviour in jumping spiders. J. Evol. Biol. 20, 14781489.
  • Suter, R.B. & Stratton, G.E. (2005). Scytodes vs. Schizocosa: predatory techniques and their morphological correlates. J. Arachnol. 33, 715.
  • Tarsitano, M. & Andrew, R. (1999). Scanning and route selection in the jumping spider Portia labiata. Anim. Behav. 58, 255265.
  • Tarsitano, M.S. (2006). Route selection by a jumping spider (Portia labiata) during the locomotory phase of a detour. Anim. Behav. 72, 14371442.
  • Tarsitano, M.S. & Jackson, R.R. (1997). Araneophagic jumping spiders discriminate between detour routes that do and do not lead to prey. Anim. Behav. 53, 257266.
  • Tarsitano, M.S., Jackson, R.R. & Kirchner, W. (2000). Signals and signal choices made by araneophagic jumping spiders while hunting the orb-weaving spiders Zygiella x-notata and Zosis genicularis. Ethology 106, 595615.
  • Terrace, H.S. (1985). Animal cognition: thinking without language. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 308, 113128.
  • Wignall, A.E. & Taylor, P.W. (2009). Alternative predatory strategies of an araneophagic assassin bug (Stenolemus bituberus). Acta Ethol. 12, 2327.
  • Wignall, A.E. & Taylor, P.W. (2010). Predatory behaviour of an araneophagic assassin bug. J. Ethol. 28, 437445.
  • Wignall, A.E. & Taylor, P.W. (2011). Assassin bug uses aggressive mimicry to lure spider prey. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 278, 14271433.
  • Wilson, D.P. (1937). The habits of the angler-fish, Lophius piscatorius L., in the Plymouth Aquarium. J. Mar. Biolog. Assoc. 21, 477497.
  • Wise, D.H. (1993). Spiders in ecological webs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Witt, P.N. (1975). The web as a means of communication. Bioscience Commun. 1, 723.
  • Yeargan, K.V. (1994). Biology of bolas spiders. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39, 8199.
  • Yeargan, K.V. & Quate, L.W. (1996). Juvenile bolas spiders attract psychodid flies. Oecologia 106, 266271.
  • Yeargan, K.V. & Quate, L.W. (1997). Adult male bolas spiders retain juvenile hunting tactics. Oecologia 112, 572576.