Inconsistencies undermine the credibility of confession evidence
Version of Record online: 20 FEB 2014
© 2014 The British Psychological Society
Legal and Criminological Psychology
Volume 21, Issue 1, pages 161–173, February 2016
How to Cite
Palmer, M. A., Button, L., Barnett, E. and Brewer, N. (2016), Inconsistencies undermine the credibility of confession evidence. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 21: 161–173. doi: 10.1111/lcrp.12048
- Issue online: 21 JAN 2016
- Version of Record online: 20 FEB 2014
- Manuscript Revised: 23 JAN 2014
- Manuscript Received: 26 AUG 2013
- Australian Research Council. Grant Number: DP1093210
Data S1. Stimulus materials.
Data S2. Analyses of additional verdict measures.
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.