Retributive Whisper: Communicative Elements in Parole

Authors


  • The authors warmly thank Professor Antony Duff for his insightful comments and Professor Julian Roberts for his generous help and wonderful support. The authors also thank Professor Ruth Kannai for excellence guidance in research (the article is based, in part, on a revised chapter from a PhD dissertation at Bar-Ilan University, Faculty of Law, Israel), as well as Professor Natti Ronel for his great support. The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Abstract

The aims of retributive or nonutilitarian sentencing are said to conflict with parole as part of a determinate sentencing framework. In this article, we claim that a nonutilitarian approach to punishment does not necessarily conflict with parole. In particular, by adopting core elements of Duff's framework of communicative sentencing, we argue that parole inherently holds a communicative meaning in the form of retributive whisper and can thus be reconciled with a nonutilitarian approach to punishment. In addition, we explore a way to enhance the communicative potential in the parole process and suggest that by recognizing and further incorporating the inherent communicative message in parole we can increase or maximize the board's communicative potential. Finally, we discuss some benefits that can emerge from adapting a communicative sentencing framework to the parole process.

Ancillary