The planetesimal bow shock model for chondrule formation: A more quantitative assessment of the standard (fixed Jupiter) case

Authors

  • Lon L. HOOD,

    Corresponding author
    1. Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, 1629 E. University Blvd., Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA
      Corresponding author. E-mail: lon@lpl.arizona.edu
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Stuart J. WEIDENSCHILLING

    1. Planetary Science Institute, 1700 E. Ft. Lowell Rd, Suite 106, Tucson, Arizona 85719, USA
    Search for more papers by this author

Corresponding author. E-mail: lon@lpl.arizona.edu

Abstract

Abstract– One transient heating mechanism that can potentially explain the formation of most meteoritic chondrules 1–3 Myr after CAIs is shock waves produced by planetary embryos perturbed into eccentric orbits via resonances with Jupiter following its formation. The mechanism includes both bow shocks upstream of resonant bodies and impact vapor plume shocks produced by high-velocity collisions of the embryos with small nonresonant planetesimals. Here, we investigate the efficiency of both shock processes using an improved planetesimal accretion and orbital evolution code together with previous simulations of vapor plume expansion in the nebula. Only the standard version of the model (with Jupiter assumed to have its present semimajor axis and eccentricity) is considered. After several hundred thousand years of integration time, about 4–5% of remaining embryos have eccentricities greater than about 0.33 and shock velocities at 3 AU exceeding 6 km s−1, currently considered to be a minimum for melting submillimeter-sized silicate precursors in bow shocks. Most embryos perturbed into highly eccentric orbits are relatively large—half as large as the Moon or larger. Bodies of this size could yield chondrule-cooling rates during bow shock passage compatible with furnace experiment results. The cumulative area of the midplane that would be traversed by highly eccentric embryos and their associated bow shocks over a period of 1–2 Myr is <1% of the total area. However, future simulations that consider a radially migrating Jupiter and alternate initial distributions of the planetesimal swarm may yield higher efficiencies.

Ancillary