SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anderson JH, Faulds PL, Atlas WI, Quinn TP (2012) Reproductive success of captively bred and naturally spawned Chinook salmon colonizing newly accessible habitat. Evolutionary Applications, 1752–4571, 115.
  • Araki H, Blouin MS (2005) Unbiased estimation of relative reproductive success of different groups: evaluation and correction of bias caused by parentage assignment errors. Molecular Ecology, 14, 40974109.
  • Araki H, Cooper B, Blouin MS (2007a) Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild. Science, 318, 100103.
  • Araki H, Ardren WR, Olsen E, Cooper B, Blouin MS (2007b) Reproductive success of captive-bred steelhead trout in the wild: evaluation of three hatchery programs in the Hood River. Conservation Biology, 21, 181190.
  • Araki H, Cooper B, Blouin MS (2009) Carry-over effect of captive breeding reduces reproductive fitness of wild-born descendants in the wild. Biology Letters, 5, 621624.
  • Banks MA, Blouin MS, Baldwin BA et al. (1999) Isolation and inheritance of novel microsatellites in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Journal of Heredity, 90, 281288.
  • Berejikian BA, Van Doornik DM, Scheurer JA, Bush R (2009) Reproductive behavior and relative reproductive success of natural- and hatchery-origin Hood Canal summer chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 66, 781789.
  • Berejikian BA, Van Doornik DM, Endicott RC et al. (2010) Mating success of alternative male phenotypes and evidence for frequency-dependent selection in Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 67, 19331941.
  • Berntson EA, Carmichael RW, Flesher MW, Ward EJ, Moran P (2011) Diminished reproductive success of Steelhead from a hatchery supplementation program (Little Sheep Creek, Imnaha Basin, Oregon). Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 140, 685698.
  • Cairney M, Taggart JB, Hoyheim B (2000) Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L) and cross-species amplification in other salmonids. Molecular Ecology, 9, 21752178.
  • Chilcote MW, Leider SA, Loch JJ (1986) Differential reproductive success of hatchery and wild summer-run steelhead under natural conditions. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 115, 726735.
  • Chilcote MW, Goodson KW, Falcy MR (2011) Reduced recruitment performance in natural populations of anadromous salmonids associated with hatchery-reared fish. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 68, 511522.
  • Christie MR, Marine ML, French RA, Blouin MS (2011) Genetic adaptation to captivity can occur in a single generation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 238242.
  • Cuenco ML, Backman TWH, Mundy PR (1993) The use of supplementation to aid in natural stock restoration. In: Genetic Conservation of Salmonid Fisheries (eds Cloud JG, Thorgaard GH), pp. 269293. Plenum Press, New York.
  • Duchesne P, Bernatchez L (2002) An analytical investigation of the dynamics of inbreeding in multi-generation supportive breeding. Conservation Genetics, 3, 4760.
  • Duchesne P, Etienne C, Bernatchez L (2006) PERM: A computer program to detect structuring factors in meaningful social units. Molecular Ecology Notes, 6, 965976.
  • Eldridge WH, Myers JM, Naish KA (2009) Long-term changes in the fine-scale population structure of coho salmon populations (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Heredity, 103, 299309.
  • Fleming IA, Gross MR (1993) Breeding success of hatchery and wild coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in competition. Ecological Applications, 3, 230245.
  • Fleming IA, Jonsson B, Gross MR, Lamberg A (1996) An experimental study of the reproductive behaviour and success of farmed and wild Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar). Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 905.
  • Foote CJ, Brown GS, Wood CC (1997) Spawning success of males using alternative mating tactics in sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 54, 17851795.
  • Ford MJ (2002) Selection in captivity during supportive breeding may reduce fitness in the wild. Conservation Biology, 16, 815825.
  • Ford MJ, Hard JJ, Boelts B, LaHood E, Miller J (2008) Estimates of natural selection in a salmon population in captive and natural environments. Conservation Biology, 22, 783794.
  • Frankham R (2008) Genetic adaptation to captivity in species conservation programs. Molecular Ecology, 17, 325333.
  • Frankham R, Loebel DA (1992) Modeling problems in conservation genetics using captive Drosophila populations: rapid genetic adaptation to captivity. Zoo Biology, 11, 333342.
  • Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to Conservation Genetics, pp. 419447. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Fraser DJ (2008) How well can captive breeding programs conserve biodiversity? A review of salmonids. Evolutionary Applications, 1, 535586.
  • Goodman D (2005) Selection equilibrium for hatchery and wild spawning fitness in integrated breeding programs. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62, 374389.
  • Greig C, Banks MA (1999) Five multiplexed microsatellite loci for rapid response run identification of California's endangered winter Chinook salmon. Animal Genetics, 30, 316317.
  • Greig C, Jacobson DP, Banks MA (2003) New tetranucleotide microsatellites for fine-scale discrimination among endangered Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Molecular Ecology Notes, 3, 376379.
  • Heath DD, Heath JW, Bryden CA, Johnson RM, Fox CW (2003) Rapid evolution of egg size in captive salmon. Science, 299, 17381740.
  • Interior Columbia Technical Recovery Team (ICTRT) (2005) Interior Columbia Basin TRT: Viability Criteria for Application to Interior Columbia Basin Salmonid ESUs. Attachment E: Population/Major Population Grouping Summaries (by ESU). Available at: http://www.nwfsc.noaa.gov/trt/trt_documents/viability2005_july_draft.pdf (accessed 12 March 2012).
  • IUCN (1998) Guidelines for Reintroductions. Available at: http://www.iucn.org/knowledge/tools/tools/conservation/ (Accessed 12 March 2012).
  • Johnsson JI, Petersson E, Jonsson E, Bjornsson BT, Jarvi T (1996) Domestication and growth hormone alter antipredator behaviour and growth patterns in juvenile brown trout, Salmo trutta. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 53, 15461554.
  • Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology, 16, 10991106.
  • Laikre L, Schwartz MK, Waples RS, Ryman N, The GeM Working Group (2010) Compromising genetic diversity in the wild: unmonitored large-scale release of plants and animals. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 25, 520529.
  • Larsen DA, Beckman BR, Cooper KA et al. (2004) Assessment of high rates of precocious male maturation in a spring Chinook salmon supplementation hatchery program. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 133, 98120.
  • Lynch M, O'Hely M (2001) Captive breeding and the genetic fitness of natural populations. Conservation Genetics, 2, 363378.
  • Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology, 7, 639655.
  • Matala AP, Young W, Vogel JL, Narum SR (2012) Influences of hatchery supplementation, spawner distribution and habitat on genetic structure of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the South Fork Salmon River, ID. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 32, 346359.
  • McGinnity P, Jennings E, deEyto E et al. (2009) Impact of naturally spawning captive-bred Atlantic salmon on wild populations: depressed recruitment and increased risk of climate-mediated extinction. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 276, 36013610.
  • McLean JE, Bentzen P, Quinn TP (2003) Differential reproductive success of sympatric, naturally spawning hatchery and wild steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) through the adult stage. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 60, 433440.
  • Naish KA, Taylor JE, Levin PS et al. (2007) An evaluation of the effects of conservation and fishery enhancement hatcheries on wild populations of salmon. Advances in Marine Biology, 53, 61194.
  • Narum SR, Hess JE, Matala AP (2010) Examining genetic lineages of Chinook salmon in the Columbia River Basin. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 139, 14651477.
  • Nelson RJ, Beacham TD (1999) Isolation and cross species amplification of microsatellite loci useful for study of Pacific salmon. Animal Genetics, 30, 228229.
  • Olsen JB, Bentzen P, Seeb JE (1998) Characterization of seven microsatellite loci derived from pink salmon. Molecular Ecology, 7, 10871089.
  • Paquet PJ, Flagg T, Appleby A et al. (2011) Hatcheries, conservation, and sustainable fisheries—achieving multiple goals: results of the Hatchery Scientific Review Group's Columbia River basin review. Fisheries, 36, 547561.
  • Pearsons TN, Fritts AL, Scott JL (2007) The effects of hatchery domestication on competitive dominance of juvenile spring Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 64, 803812.
  • Rabe CD, Nelson DD (2010) Status and Monitoring of Natural and Supplemented Chinook Salmon in Johnson Creek, Idaho. Report of Nez Perce Tribe to Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oregon. Available at: https://pisces.bpa.gov/release/documents/documentviewer.aspx?doc=P124099.
  • Reisenbichler RR, Rubin S, Wetzel L, Phelps S (2004) Natural selection after release from a hatchery leads to domestication in steelhead, Oncorhynchus mykiss. In: Stock Enhancement and Sea Ranching (eds Leber M, Kitada S, Blankenship HL, Svasand T), pp. 371384. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford.
  • Rexroad CE, Coleman RL, Martin AM, Hershberger WK, Killefer J (2001) Thirty-five polymorphic microsatellite markers for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Animal Genetics, 32, 317319.
  • Schroder SL, Knudsen CM, Pearsons TN et al. (2008) Breeding success of wild and first generation hatchery female spring Chinook salmon spawning in an artificial stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 137, 14751489.
  • Schroder SL, Knudsen CM, Pearsons TN et al. (2010) Behavior and breeding success of wild and first generation hatchery male spring Chinook Salmon spawning in an artificial stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 139, 9891003.
  • Shuster SM, Miller MP, Lang BK, Zorich N, Huynh L, Keim P (2005) The effects of controlled propagation on an endangered species: genetic differentiation and divergence in body size among native and captive populations of the Socorro Isopod (Crustacea: Flabellifera). Conservation Genetics, 6, 355368.
  • Theriault V, Moyer GR, Jackson LS, Blouin MS, Banks MA (2011) Reduced reproductive success of hatchery Coho salmon in the wild: insights into most likely mechanisms. Molecular Ecology, 20, 18601869.
  • Wang J, Ryman N (2001) Genetic effects of multiple generations of supportive breeding. Conservation Biology, 15, 16191631.
  • Wang S, Hard JJ, Utter FM (2002) Salmonid inbreeding: a review. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 11, 301319.
  • Waples RS, Gustafson RG, Weitkamp LA et al. (2001) Characterizing diversity in salmon from the Pacific Northwest. Journal of Fish Biology, 59, 141.
  • Waples RS, Ford MJ, Schmitt D (2007) Empirical results of salmon supplementation in the Northeast Pacific: a preliminary assessment. In: Ecological and Genetic Implications of Aquaculture Activities (ed. Bert TM), pp. 383403. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
  • Williams SE, Hoffman EA (2009) Minimizing genetic adaptation in captive breeding programs: A review. Biological Conservation, 142, 23882400.
  • Williamson KS, Cordes JF, May B (2002) Characterization of microsatellite loci in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and cross-species amplification in other salmonids. Molecular Ecology Notes, 2, 1719.
  • Williamson KS, Murdoch AR, Pearsons TN, Ward EJ, Ford MJ (2010) Factors influencing the relative fitness of hatchery and wild spring Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the Wenatchee River, Washington, USA. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 67, 18401851.