SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
mec12049-sup-0001-FigS1.pdfWord document6573KFig. S1 Species trees.
mec12049-sup-0002-FigS2.pdfapplication/PDF58KFig. S2 Flowchart showing the steps involved in identifying SNPs (heterozygous positions) within each primary alignment.
mec12049-sup-0003-FigS3-S5.pdfapplication/PDF305K

Fig. S3 The frequency of the number of imperfect linkages (SNPs that could be linked in more than one way) within inferred genotypes (individual-locus combinations).

Fig. S4 Enlargement of S3 showing the bottom portion of the histogram more clearly.

Fig. S5 The frequencies of the proportions of imperfect linkages (SNPs that could be linked in more than one way) within inferred genotypes (individual-locus combination).

mec12049-sup-0004-TableS1.docWord document157KTable S1 Locality and sampling information for all individuals used in this study.
mec12049-sup-0005-TableS2.docxWord document134KTable S2 Information for loci used in this study.
mec12049-sup-0006-TableS3.xlsapplication/msexcel36KTable S3 Structure statistics resulting from analysis of the full data set.
mec12049-sup-0007-TableS4.docxWord document51KTable S4 Approximate costs of this study compared with Sanger sequencing.

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.