The genetic legacy of the 19th-century decline of the British polecat: evidence for extensive introgression from feral ferrets
Version of Record online: 17 SEP 2013
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Volume 22, Issue 20, pages 5130–5147, October 2013
How to Cite
Costa, M., Fernandes, C., Birks, J. D. S., Kitchener, A. C., Santos-Reis, M. and Bruford, M. W. (2013), The genetic legacy of the 19th-century decline of the British polecat: evidence for extensive introgression from feral ferrets. Molecular Ecology, 22: 5130–5147. doi: 10.1111/mec.12456
- Issue online: 10 OCT 2013
- Version of Record online: 17 SEP 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 13 JUN 2013
- Manuscript Revised: 28 MAY 2013
- Manuscript Received: 10 FEB 2013
- Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia. Grant Number: SFRH/BD/32488/2006
- Ciência. Grant Number: C2007-UL-342-CBA1
Supporting information 1:
Table S1 Information and results for the samples analysed in this study.
Table S2 Details of the prior and hyperprior parameters used in the Storz & Beaumont (2002) Bayesian approach, implemented in MSVAR v1.3.
Table S3 median values and 90% highest probability density (HPD) limits of the posterior distributions for the current (N0) and ancestral (N1) effective population sizes, and the time (T) since the population size change, calculated using BOA v1.1.7.
Table S4 Current effective population size estimates (Ne) and 95% confidence intervals obtained from the linkage disequilibrium and the approximate Bayesian computation method.
Fig. S1 Distribution of the polecat/ferret wild samples used in this study across the British Islands.
Fig. S2 Distribution of allele frequencies per locus obtained for polecats and ferrets.
Fig. S3 The efficiency (a) and accuracy (b) of detecting purebred parentals and hybrids using different thresholds (Tq) in Structure.
Fig. S4 The efficiency (a) and accuracy (b) of detecting the three genotype frequency classes (criterion 2) using different thresholds for the posterior probability of belonging to each class in NewHybrids.
|mec12456-sup-0002-SupportingInformation2.doc||Word document||27K||Supporting information 2. Detailed description of the criteria used to classify individuals based on morphology.|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.