Bacterial taxa–area and distance–decay relationships in marine environments
Version of Record online: 25 JAN 2014
© 2013 The Authors. Molecular Ecology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Volume 23, Issue 4, pages 954–964, February 2014
How to Cite
Zinger, L., Boetius, A. and Ramette, A. (2014), Bacterial taxa–area and distance–decay relationships in marine environments. Molecular Ecology, 23: 954–964. doi: 10.1111/mec.12640
- Issue online: 29 JAN 2014
- Version of Record online: 25 JAN 2014
- Accepted manuscript online: 21 DEC 2013 07:54AM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 13 DEC 2013
- Manuscript Revised: 9 DEC 2013
- Manuscript Received: 29 AUG 2013
- Leibniz program
- the Max Planck Society
- Helmholtz Association
- ANR project. Grant Number: ANR-09-GENM-033
- European Union's Seventh Framework Programme. Grant Number: 287589
|mec12640-sup-0001-TableS1.R||application/r||56K||Table S1 Sample name and associated characteristics. Longitudes and latitudes are provided in decimal degrees and sample depth in metres.|
Table S2 Data set characteristics per ecosystem type and realm.
Fig. S1 Schematic representation of the analytical pipeline used to calculate TAR's and DDR's slope coefficients.
Fig. S2 Effect of the removal of rare taxa on data set characteristics in surface-sea waters (green, squares), deep-sea waters (blue, circles) and coastal sediments (orange, triangles): (a) number of nonempty, remaining samples, (b–d) pairwise geographic distances, (e–g) Average richness and percentage of remaining OTUs and sequences per samples, (h) Average OTU relative occupancy (average proportion of sites occupied by each OTU), (i) Proportion of OTUs detected in the smallest area, (j–l) Pairwise similarities between close (geographic distances <2000 km, left part of boxplots) and distant communities (geographic distances >12 000 km, right part of boxplots).
Fig. S3 Effect of the removal of rare taxa TAR (a) and DDR (b) slope coefficients and intercepts.
Fig. S4 Relationship between z and β obtained per realm/ecosystem type obtained with 1000 randomly resampling of 40 samples in the standardized presence/absence community tables.
Fig. S5 Distribution of Kendall τ correlation coefficients between z and β pairs obtained for each ecosystem type at each resampling step (green bars) and between z and permuted β values (grey bars) defined as a null distribution.
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.