Medical Education

Cover image for Vol. 39 Issue 3

March 2005

Volume 39, Issue 3

Pages 239–346

    1. In this issue (page 239)

      Version of Record online: 23 FEB 2005 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02102.x

  1. Editorial

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Commentaries
    4. Student selection
    5. Assessment
    6. Anatomy teaching
    7. Short report
    8. Making sense of qualitative research
    9. Letters to the editor
    1. How to choose tomorrow's doctors (pages 240–242)

      Jillian Morrison

      Version of Record online: 23 FEB 2005 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02080.x

  2. Commentaries

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Commentaries
    4. Student selection
    5. Assessment
    6. Anatomy teaching
    7. Short report
    8. Making sense of qualitative research
    9. Letters to the editor
    1. Implications of psychology-type theories for full curriculum interventions (pages 247–249)

      Geoffrey R Norman, Kevin W Eva and Henk G Schmidt

      Version of Record online: 14 FEB 2005 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02100.x

  3. Student selection

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Commentaries
    4. Student selection
    5. Assessment
    6. Anatomy teaching
    7. Short report
    8. Making sense of qualitative research
    9. Letters to the editor
    1. Assessment of personal qualities in relation to admission to medical school (pages 258–265)

      Mary Ann Lumsden, Miles Bore, Keith Millar, Rachael Jack and David Powis

      Version of Record online: 23 FEB 2005 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02087.x

    2. Selection of medical students according to their moral orientation (pages 266–275)

      Miles Bore, Don Munro, Ian Kerridge and David Powis

      Version of Record online: 23 FEB 2005 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02088.x

  4. Assessment

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Commentaries
    4. Student selection
    5. Assessment
    6. Anatomy teaching
    7. Short report
    8. Making sense of qualitative research
    9. Letters to the editor
    1. Sources of validity evidence for an internal medicine student evaluation system: an evaluative study of assessment methods (pages 276–283)

      Chirayu Auewarakul, Steven M Downing, Uapong Jaturatamrong and Rungnirand Praditsuwan

      Version of Record online: 23 FEB 2005 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02090.x

    2. Assessment in the context of uncertainty: how many members are needed on the panel of reference of a script concordance test? (pages 284–291)

      R Gagnon, B Charlin, M Coletti, E Sauvé and C Van Der Vleuten

      Version of Record online: 23 FEB 2005 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02092.x

    3. Putting double marking to the test: a framework to assess if it is worth the trouble (pages 299–308)

      Rebecca Cannings, Kamila Hawthorne, Kerenza Hood and Helen Houston

      Version of Record online: 23 FEB 2005 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02093.x

    4. Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes (pages 309–317)

      Cees P M Van Der Vleuten and Lambert W T Schuwirth

      Version of Record online: 23 FEB 2005 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02094.x

  5. Anatomy teaching

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Commentaries
    4. Student selection
    5. Assessment
    6. Anatomy teaching
    7. Short report
    8. Making sense of qualitative research
    9. Letters to the editor
    1. Do students have sufficient knowledge of clinical anatomy? (pages 326–332)

      Katinka J A H Prince, Albert J A A Scherpbier, Henk Van Mameren, Jan Drukker and Cees P M Van Der Vleuten

      Version of Record online: 23 FEB 2005 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02096.x

  6. Short report

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Commentaries
    4. Student selection
    5. Assessment
    6. Anatomy teaching
    7. Short report
    8. Making sense of qualitative research
    9. Letters to the editor
    1. Avoidable breaches of confidentiality: a study among students of medicine and of law (pages 333–337)

      Bernice S Elger and Timothy W Harding

      Version of Record online: 23 FEB 2005 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02097.x

  7. Making sense of qualitative research

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Commentaries
    4. Student selection
    5. Assessment
    6. Anatomy teaching
    7. Short report
    8. Making sense of qualitative research
    9. Letters to the editor
  8. Letters to the editor

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Commentaries
    4. Student selection
    5. Assessment
    6. Anatomy teaching
    7. Short report
    8. Making sense of qualitative research
    9. Letters to the editor
    1. Should plastic surgery experience be an integral part of orthopaedic and trauma surgical training? (page 345)

      Mark S Gaston, Anish Amin and Ken J Stewart

      Version of Record online: 27 JAN 2005 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02081.x

    2. The contribution of the social sciences to academic medicine (pages 345–346)

      Woody Caan and Dawn Hillier

      Version of Record online: 23 FEB 2005 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02082.x

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION