Medical Education

Cover image for Vol. 45 Issue 6

June 2011

Volume 45, Issue 6

Pages 541–649

  1. In this issue

    1. Top of page
    2. In this issue
    3. Commentaries
    4. Medical Education in Review
    5. Assessment
    6. Professionalism
    7. Sexual Harassment
    8. Gender in Medicine
    9. Critical Thinking
    10. Informed Self-Assessment
    11. Letters to the Editor
    1. in this issue (page 541)

      Version of Record online: 12 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04021.x

  2. Commentaries

    1. Top of page
    2. In this issue
    3. Commentaries
    4. Medical Education in Review
    5. Assessment
    6. Professionalism
    7. Sexual Harassment
    8. Gender in Medicine
    9. Critical Thinking
    10. Informed Self-Assessment
    11. Letters to the Editor
    1. Gender and medicine: the challenges for medical educators (pages 544–546)

      Elizabeth L Crolla and Margaret A Bamforth

      Version of Record online: 12 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.03946.x

  3. Medical Education in Review

    1. Top of page
    2. In this issue
    3. Commentaries
    4. Medical Education in Review
    5. Assessment
    6. Professionalism
    7. Sexual Harassment
    8. Gender in Medicine
    9. Critical Thinking
    10. Informed Self-Assessment
    11. Letters to the Editor
    1. You have free access to this content
  4. Assessment

    1. Top of page
    2. In this issue
    3. Commentaries
    4. Medical Education in Review
    5. Assessment
    6. Professionalism
    7. Sexual Harassment
    8. Gender in Medicine
    9. Critical Thinking
    10. Informed Self-Assessment
    11. Letters to the Editor
    1. You have free access to this content
      Good questions, good answers: construct alignment improves the performance of workplace-based assessment scales (pages 560–569)

      Jim Crossley, Gavin Johnson, Joe Booth and Winnie Wade

      Version of Record online: 18 APR 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03913.x

    2. You have free access to this content
      Improving progress test score estimation using Bayesian statistics (pages 570–577)

      Chris Ricketts and Rana Moyeed

      Version of Record online: 18 APR 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03902.x

    3. You have free access to this content
      Reliability of consultation skills assessments using standardised versus real patients (pages 578–584)

      Marcel E Reinders, Annette H Blankenstein, Harm W J van Marwijk, Dirk L Knol, Paul Ram, Henriette E van der Horst, Henrica C W de Vet and Cees P M van der Vleuten

      Version of Record online: 12 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03917.x

  5. Professionalism

    1. Top of page
    2. In this issue
    3. Commentaries
    4. Medical Education in Review
    5. Assessment
    6. Professionalism
    7. Sexual Harassment
    8. Gender in Medicine
    9. Critical Thinking
    10. Informed Self-Assessment
    11. Letters to the Editor
  6. Sexual Harassment

    1. Top of page
    2. In this issue
    3. Commentaries
    4. Medical Education in Review
    5. Assessment
    6. Professionalism
    7. Sexual Harassment
    8. Gender in Medicine
    9. Critical Thinking
    10. Informed Self-Assessment
    11. Letters to the Editor
    1. Think globally, act locally: understanding sexual harassment from a cross-cultural perspective (pages 603–612)

      Hatice Ulusoy, Valerie Swigart and Firdevs Erdemir

      Version of Record online: 18 APR 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03918.x

  7. Gender in Medicine

    1. Top of page
    2. In this issue
    3. Commentaries
    4. Medical Education in Review
    5. Assessment
    6. Professionalism
    7. Sexual Harassment
    8. Gender in Medicine
    9. Critical Thinking
    10. Informed Self-Assessment
    11. Letters to the Editor
    1. ‘Important… but of low status’: male education leaders’ views on gender in medicine (pages 613–624)

      Gunilla Risberg, Eva E Johansson and Katarina Hamberg

      Version of Record online: 12 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03920.x

  8. Critical Thinking

    1. Top of page
    2. In this issue
    3. Commentaries
    4. Medical Education in Review
    5. Assessment
    6. Professionalism
    7. Sexual Harassment
    8. Gender in Medicine
    9. Critical Thinking
    10. Informed Self-Assessment
    11. Letters to the Editor
    1. Thinking critically about critical thinking: ability, disposition or both? (pages 625–635)

      Edward Krupat, Jared M Sprague, Daniel Wolpaw, Paul Haidet, David Hatem and Bridget O’Brien

      Version of Record online: 12 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03910.x

  9. Informed Self-Assessment

    1. Top of page
    2. In this issue
    3. Commentaries
    4. Medical Education in Review
    5. Assessment
    6. Professionalism
    7. Sexual Harassment
    8. Gender in Medicine
    9. Critical Thinking
    10. Informed Self-Assessment
    11. Letters to the Editor
    1. Features of assessment learners use to make informed self-assessments of clinical performance (pages 636–647)

      Joan Sargeant, Kevin W Eva, Heather Armson, Ben Chesluk, Tim Dornan, Eric Holmboe, Jocelyn M Lockyer, Elaine Loney, Karen V Mann and Cees P M van der Vleuten

      Version of Record online: 12 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03888.x

  10. Letters to the Editor

    1. Top of page
    2. In this issue
    3. Commentaries
    4. Medical Education in Review
    5. Assessment
    6. Professionalism
    7. Sexual Harassment
    8. Gender in Medicine
    9. Critical Thinking
    10. Informed Self-Assessment
    11. Letters to the Editor
    1. The influence of language family on academic performance: response to Azer (page 648)

      Benedict J Canny, Collette Mann, Jennifer Lindley and Ramesh Rajan

      Version of Record online: 12 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.03947.x

    2. Digital storytelling to facilitate reflective learning in medical students (page 649)

      John Sandars and Christopher Murray

      Version of Record online: 12 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.03991.x

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION