SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Concise Oxford English Dictionary, 12th edn. Soanes C, Stevenson A, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
  • 2
    Thorne S, Jensen L, Kearney MH, Noblit G, Sandelowski M. Qualitative metasynthesis: reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda. Qual Health Res2004;14 (10):134265.
  • 3
    Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Reviews. Oxford: Cochrane Collaboration 2012. http://www.cochrane.org/cochrane-reviews . [Accessed 1 June 2012.]
  • 4
    Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist review – a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy2005;10 (Suppl 1):2134.
  • 5
    Pope C, Mays N, Popay J. Synthesizing Qualitative and Quantitative Health Evidence. Maidenhead: Open University Press 2007;78.
  • 6
    Ring N, Ritchie K, Mandava L, Jepson R. A Guide to Synthesising Qualitative Research for Researchers Undertaking Health Technology Assessments and Systematic Reviews. National Health Service Quality Improvement Scotland 2010. http://www.nhshealthquality.org/nhsqis/8837.html. [Accessed 23 December 2012.]
  • 7
    Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B, Sutton A. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy2005;10 (1):4553.
  • 8
    Barnett-Page E, Thomas J. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol2009;9:59.
  • 9
    Cooper HM. Scientific guidelines for conducting integrative research reviews. Rev Educ Res1982;52 (2):291302.
  • 10
    Denzin NK. The elephant in the living room: or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence. Qual Res2009;9 (2):13960.
  • 11
    Dixon-Woods M, Bonas S, Booth A, Jones DR, Miller T, Sutton AJ, Shaw RL, Smith JA, Young B. How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qual Res2006;6 (1):2744.
  • 12
    Colliver JA, Kucera K, Verhulst SJ. Meta-analysis of quasi-experimental research: are systematic narrative reviews indicated?Med Educ2008;42 (9):85865.
  • 13
    Eva KW. On the limits of systematicity. Med Educ2008;42 (9):8523.
  • 14
    Suri H, Clarke D. Advancements in research synthesis methods: from a methodologically inclusive perspective. Rev Educ Res2009;79 (1):395430.
  • 15
    Maclure M. Clarity bordering on stupidity: where’s the quality in systematic review?J Educ Pol2005;20 (4):393416.
  • 16
    Bearman M, Smith C, Carbone A, Slade S, Baik C, Hughes-Warrington M, Neumann DLSystematic review methodology in higher education. High Educ Res Dev2012;31 (5):625–40.
  • 17
    Pring R. The ‘false dualism’ of educational research. J Philos Educ2000;34 (2):24760.
    Direct Link:
  • 18
    Badley G. The crisis in educational research: a pragmatic approach. Eur Educ Res J2003;2 (2):296308.
  • 19
    Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Pawson R. Internet-based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances. BMC Med Educ2010;10:12.
  • 20
    Noblit G, Hare R. Meta-ethnography: Synthesising Qualitative Studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Sage 1988.
  • 21
    Mann K, Gordon J, MacLeod A. Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract2009;14 (4):595621.
  • 22
    Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach2005;27 (1):1028.
  • 23
    Cook DA, Erwin PJ, Triola MM. Computerised virtual patients in health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med2010;85 (10):1589602.
  • 24
    Savin-Baden M, Major C. Using interpretative meta-ethnography to explore the relationship between innovative approaches to learning and their influence on faculty understanding of teaching. High Educ2007;54 (6):83352.
  • 25
    Harris J, Kearley K, Heneghan C, Meats E, Roberts N, Perera R, Kearley-Shiers K. Are journal clubs effective in supporting evidence-based decision making? A systematic review. BEME Guide No. 16. Med Teach2011;33 (1):923.
  • 26
    Wearne S, Dornan T, Teunissen PW, Skinner T. Family practitioners as supervisors in postgraduate clinical education: an integrative review. Med Educ2012;46:1161–73.
  • 27
    Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy2005;10 (Suppl):620.
  • 28
    Patton M. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 2001;41
  • 29
    Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol2008;8:45.
  • 30
    Carroll C, Booth A, Cooper K. A worked example of ‘best fit’ framework synthesis: a systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents. BMC Med Res Methodol2011;11:29.