SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Ringsted C, Hodges B, Scherpbier A. ‘The research compass’: an introduction to research in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 56. Med Teach2011;33 (9):695709.
  • 2
    Reeves S, Lewin S, Zwarenstein M. Using qualitative interviews within medical education research: why we must raise the ‘quality bar’. Med Educ2006;40 (4):2912.
  • 3
    Kuper A, Reeves S, Levinson W. An introduction to reading and appraising qualitative research. BMJ2008;337:4047.
  • 4
    Marton F. Phenomenography – describing conceptions of the world around us. Instr Sci1981;10:177200.
  • 5
    Pope C, Mays N. Critical reflections on the rise of qualitative research. BMJ2009;339:7379.
  • 6
    Bunniss S, Kelly DR. Research paradigms in medical education research. Med Educ2010;44 (4):35866.
  • 7
    Carter S, Little M. Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research. Qual Health Res2007;17:131628.
  • 8
    Larsson S. A pluralist view of generalisation in qualitative research. Int J Res Method Educ2009;32 (1):2538.
  • 9
    Marton F. Phenomenography –a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. In: Sherman R, Webb R, eds. Qualitative Research in Education: Focus and Methods. Basingstoke: Falmer Press 1988;14460.
  • 10
    Marton F, Booth S. Learning and Awareness. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1998.
  • 11
    Marton F, Pang MF. On some necessary conditions of learning. J Learn Sci2009;15 (2):193220.
  • 12
    Marton F. Phenomenography – a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. J Thought1986;21 (3):2849.
  • 13
    Svensson L. Theoretical foundations of phenomenography. High Educ Res Dev1997;16 (2):15971.
  • 14
    Giorgi A. A phenomenological perspective on certain qualitative research methods. J Phenomenolog Psychol1994;25 (2):190220.
  • 15
    Larsson J, Holmström I. Phenomenographic or phenomenological analysis: does it matter? Examples from a study on anaesthesiologists’ workInt J Qual Stud Health Well-being2007;2 (1):5564.
  • 16
    Creswell JW ed. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 2nd edn. London: Sage Publications 2006;1131.
  • 17
    Kennedy TJT, Lingard LA. Making sense of grounded theory in medical education. Med Educ2006;40 (2):1018.
  • 18
    Richardson JTE. The concepts and methods of phenomenographic research. Rev Educ Res1999;69 (1):5382.
  • 19
    Wilhelmsson N, Dahlgren LO, Hult H, Scheja M, Lonka K, Josephson A. The anatomy of learning anatomy. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract2010;15 (2):15365.
  • 20
    Trigwell K, Prosser M, Waterhouse F. Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. High Educ1999;37 (1):5770.
  • 21
    Fyrenius A, Wirell S, Silén C. Student approaches to achieving understanding – approaches to learning revisited. Stud High Educ2007;32 (2):14965.
  • 22
    Dahlgren MA. Learning physiotherapy: students’ ways of experiencing the patient encounter. Physiother Res Int1998;3 (4):25773.
  • 23
    Trigwell K, Prosser M. Changing approaches to teaching: a relational perspective. Stud High Educ1996;21:27584.
  • 24
    Stenfors-Hayes T, Hult H, Dahlgren LO. What does it mean to be a good teacher and clinical supervisor in medical education?Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract2011;16 (2):197210.
  • 25
    Stenfors-Hayes T, Hult H, Dahlgren LO. What does it mean to be a mentor in medical education?Med Teach2011;33 (8):4238.
  • 26
    Stenfors-Hayes T. Being and Becoming a Teacher in Medical Education. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet 2011.
  • 27
    Marton F, Säljö R. On qualitative differences in learning – 1: outcome and process. Br J Educ Psychol1976;46:411.
  • 28
    Webb G. Deconstructing deep and surface : towards a critique of phenomenography. High Educ1997;33:195212.
  • 29
    Entwistle N. Reconstituting approaches to learning: a response to Webb. High Educ1997;33 (2):2138.
  • 30
    Heiwe S, Clyne N, Dahlgren MA. Living with chronic renal failure: patients’ experiences of their physical and functional capacity. Physiother Res Int2003;8 (4):16777.
  • 31
    Stålsby Lundborg C, Wahlström R, Dall’Alba G. Ways of experiencing asthma management: variations among general practitioners in Sweden. Scand J Prim Health1999;17 (4):22631.
  • 32
    Holmström I, Halford C, Rosenqvist U. Swedish health care professionals’ diverse understandings of diabetes care. Patient Educ Couns2003;51 (1):538.
  • 33
    Bendz M. The first year of rehabilitation after a stroke – from two perspectives. Scand J Caring Sci2003;17 (3):21522.
  • 34
    Barnard A, McCosker H, Gerber R. Phenomenography: a qualitative research approach for exploring understanding in health care. Qual Health Res1999;9 (2):21226.
  • 35
    Dall’Alba G. Understanding professional practice: investigations before and after an educational programme. Stud High Educ2004;29 (6):67992.
  • 36
    Trigwell K, Prosser M. Towards an understanding of individual acts of teaching and learning. High Educ Res Dev1997;16 (2):24152.
  • 37
    Åkerlind G. A new dimension to understanding university teaching. Teach High Educ2004;9 (3):36375.
  • 38
    Wood K. The experience of learning to teach: changing student teachers’ ways of understanding teaching. J Curriculum Stud2000;32 (1):7593.
  • 39
    Åkerlind G. Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. High Educ Res Dev2005;24 (4):32134.
  • 40
    Dall’Alba G. Understanding medical practice: different outcomes of a pre-medical program. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract2002;7 (3):16377.
  • 41
    MacDougall J, Drummond MJ. The development of medical teachers: an enquiry into the learning histories of 10 experienced medical teachers. Med Educ2005;39 (12):121320.
  • 42
    Knight LV, Bligh J. Physicians’ perceptions of clinical teaching: a qualitative analysis in the context of change. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract2006;11:22134.
  • 43
    Bowden J. Reflections on the phenomenographic team research process. In: Green P, Bowden JA, eds. Doing Developmental Phenomenography. Melbourne, Vic: RMIT Publishing 2005;1131.
  • 44
    Abrandt M. Learning Physiotherapy: The impact of formal education and professional experience. Linköping Studies in Education and Psychology No. 50. 1997.
  • 45
    Booth S. On phenomenography, learning and teaching. High Educ Res Dev1997;16 (2):13558.
  • 46
    Sjöström B, Dahlgren LO. Applying phenomenography in nursing research. J Adv Nurs2002;40 (3):33945.
  • 47
    Entwistle N. Introduction: phenomenography in higher education. High Educ Res Dev1997;16 (2):12734.
  • 48
    Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 2009.
  • 49
    Ashworth P, Lucas U. Achieving empathy and engagement: a practical approach to the design, conduct and reporting of phenomenographic research. Stud High Educ2000;25 (3):295308.
  • 50
    Marton F. Phenomenography. In: Husén T, Postlethwaite N, eds. The International Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford: Pergamon Press 1994;44249.
  • 51
    Sandbergh J. Are phenomenographic results reliable?High Educ Res Dev1997;16 (2):20312.
  • 52
    Bowden JA. The nature of phenomenographic research. In: Bowden JA, Walsh E, eds. Phenomenographic Research: Variations in Method. Melbourne, Vic.: Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology 1994.
  • 53
    Dahlgren LO, Fallsberg M. Phenomenography as a qualitative approach in social pharmacy research. J Soc Adm Pharm1991;8 (4):1506.
  • 54
    Walsh E. Phenomenographic analysis of interview transcripts. In: Bowden JA, Walsh E, eds. Phenomenographic Research: Variations in Method. Melbourne, Vic.: Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology 1994;1730.
  • 55
    Wahlström R, Beermann B, Dahlgren LO, Diwan V. Changing primary care doctors’ conceptions – a qualitative approach to evaluating an intervention. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract1997;2:22136.
  • 56
    Bowden JA. Experience of phenomenographic research: a personal account. In: Bowden JA, Walsh E, eds. Phenomenographic Research: Variations in Methods. Melbourne, Vic.: Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology 1994;4455.
  • 57
    Prosser M. Some experiences of using phenomenographic research methodology in the context of research in teaching and learning. In: Bowden JA, Walsh E, eds. Phenomenographic Research: Variations in Method. Melbourne, Vic: Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology 1994;3143.
  • 58
    Åkerlind G. Learning about phenomenography: interviewing, data analysis and the qualitative research paradigm. In: Bowden JA, Green P, eds. Doing Developmental Phenomenography. Melbourne, Vic.: RMIT Publishing 2005;6373.
  • 59
    Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet2001;358 (9280):4838.
  • 60
    Kuper A, Lingard L, Levinson W. Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ2008;337:6879.
  • 61
    Giacomini MK, Cook DJ. User’s guides to the medical literature xxiii. Qualitative research in health care a. Are the results of the study valid?. JAMA2000;284 (3):35762.
  • 62
    Cote L, Turgeon J. Appraising qualitative research articles in medicine and medical education. Med Teach2005;27 (1):715.
  • 63
    Inui TS, Frankel RM. Evaluating the quality of qualitative research: a proposal pro tem. J Gen Intern Med1991;6 (5):4856.
  • 64
    Mays N, Pope C. Assessing quality in qualitative research. Qual Res2000;320:502.
  • 65
    Mays N, Pope C. Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ1995;311:10912.
  • 66
    Greenhalgh T, Taylor R. Papers that go beyond numbers. BMJ1998;1 (4):223.
  • 67
    Devers KJ. How will we know ‘good’ qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services researchHealth Serv Res1999;34 (5 Pt 2):115388.
  • 68
    Giacomini MK, Cook D. Users’ guide to the medical literature xxiii. Qualitative research in health care b. What are the results and how do they help me care for my patients?JAMA2000;284 (4):47882.
  • 69
    Guba EG. Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educ Technol Res Dev1981;29 (2):7591.
  • 70
    Wahlström R, Dahlgren LO, Tomson G, Diwan VK, Beermann B. Changing primary care doctors’ conceptions – a qualitative approach to evaluating an intervention. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract1997;2 (3):22136.
  • 71
    Sandbergh J. Are phenomenographic results reliable?High Educ1997;16:20312.
  • 72
    Koch T. Establishing rigour in qualitative research: the decision trail. J Adv Nurs1994;19:97686.
  • 73
    Sin S. Considerations of quality in phenomenographic research. Int J Qual Methods2010;9:30519.
  • 74
    Uljens M. On the philosophical foundations of phenomenography. In: Dall’Alba G, Hasselgren B, eds. Reflections on Phenomenography: Toward a Methodology? Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis 1996;10328.
  • 75
    Cherry N. Phenomenography as seen by an action researcher. In: Bowden JA, Green P, eds. Doing Developmental Phenomenography. Melbourne, Vic.: RMIT Publishing 2005;5663.
  • 76
    Säljö R. Talk as data and practice – a critical look at phenomenographic inquiry and the appeal to experience. High Educ Res Dev1997;16 (2):17390.
  • 77
    Dall’Alba G, Hasselgren B eds. Reflections on Phenomenography. Toward a Methodology? Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis 1996.
  • 78
    Bowden JA, Green P, eds. Doing developmental phenomenography. Melbourne, Vic: RMIT Publishing; 2005.
  • 79
    Green P. A rigorous journey into phenomenography: from a naturalistic inquirer viewpoint. In: Bowden JA, Green P, eds. Doing Developmental Phenomenography. Melbourne, Vic.: RMIT Publishing 2005;3247.
  • 80
    Richardson J. Students’ approaches to learning and teachers’ approaches to teaching in higher education. Educ Psychol2005;25 (6):67380.
  • 81
    Kember D, Kwan KP. Lecturers’ approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instr Sci2000;28:46990.
  • 82
    Prebble T, Hargraves H, Leach L, Naidoo K, Suddaby G, Zepke N. Impact of student support services and academic development programmes on student outcomes in undergraduate tertiary study: a synthesis of the research. [Technical Report] Wellington: Ministry of Education, New Zealand 2004.