SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bartels, D. 2008: Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making. Cognition, 108, 381417.
  • Bartels, D. M. and Pizarro, D. A. 2011: The mismeasure of morals: Antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas. Cognition, 121, 15461.
  • Berker, S. 2009: The normative insignificance of neuroscience. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 37, 293329.
  • Ciaramelli, E., Muccioli, M., Ladavas, E. and di Pellegrino, G. 2007: Selective deficit in personal moral judgment following damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2, 8492.
  • Choe S. Y. and Min, K-H. 2011: Who makes utilitarian judgments? The influences of emotions on utilitarian judgments. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 58092.
  • Cushman, F., Young, L. and Hauser, M. 2006: The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17, 108289.
    Direct Link:
  • Cushman, F., Young, L. and Greene, J. D. 2010: Our multi-system moral psychology: towards a consensus view. In J. M. Doris (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Moral Psychology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Etkin, A., Egner, T., Peraza, D. M., Kandel, E. R. and Hirsch, J. 2006: Resolving emotional conflict: a role for the rostral anterior cingulate cortex in modulating activity in the amygdala. Neuron, 51, 87182.
  • Evans, J. 2007: Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 25578.
  • Foot, P. 1978: The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect. In Foot, Virtues and Vices. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Green, S., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Moll, J., Stamatakis, E. A., Grafman, J. and Zhan, R. 2010: Selective functional integration between anterior temporal and distinct fronto-mesolimbic regions during guilt and indignation. Neuroimage, 54, 172026.
  • Greene J. D. 2008: The secret joke of Kant's soul. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology: The Neuroscience of Morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 3579.
  • Greene, J. D. 2009: Dual-process morality and the personal/impersonal distinction: a reply to McGuire, Langdon, Coltheart, and Mackenzie. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 58184.
  • Greene, J. D. and Haidt, J. 2002: How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 51723.
  • Greene, J. D., Cushman, F. A., Stewart. L. E., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E. and Cohen, J. D. 2009: Pushing moral buttons: the interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment. Cognition, 111, 36471.
  • Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E. and Cohen, J. D. 2008: Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107, 114454.
  • Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M. and Cohen, J. D. 2004: The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44, 389400.
  • Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M. and Cohen, J. D. 2001: An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 21057.
  • Haidt, J. 2001: The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 81434.
  • Haidt, J. 2007: The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 9981002.
  • Haidt, J. 2012: The Righteous Mind. New York: Pantheon.
  • Huebner, B., Dwyer, S. and Hauser, M. 2009: The role of emotion in moral psychology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 16.
  • Huebner, B. Hauser M. and Pettit, P. 2011: How the source, inevitability, and means of bringing about harm interact in folk-moral judgments. Mind & Language, 26, 21033.
  • James, W. 1891: The moral philosopher and the moral life. International Journal of Ethics, 1, 33054.
  • Kahane, G. and Shackel, N. 2008: Do abnormal responses show utilitarian bias? Nature, 452, E5.
  • Kahane, G. and Shackel, N. 2010: Methodological issues in the neuroscience of moral judgment. Mind & Language, 25, 56182.
  • Kahane, G., Wiech, K., Shackel, N., Farias, M., Savalescu, J. and Tracey, I. 2012: The neural basis of intuitive and counter-intuitive moral judgement. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 393402.
  • Kamm, F. M. 2010: Neuroscience and moral reasoning: a note on recent research. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 37, 4, 33045.
  • Kant, I. 1797/1966: On a supposed right to lie from philanthropy. In M. J. Gregor (ed.), Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 6115.
  • Koenigs, M., Young, L., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Cushman, F., Hauser, M. and Damasio, A. 2007: Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. Nature, 446, 90811.
  • Kurzban, R., DeScioli, P. and Fein, D. 2012: Hamilton vs. Kant: pitting adaptations for altruism against adaptations for moral judgment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 32333.
  • McGuire, J., Langdon, R., Coltheart, M. and Mackenzie, C. 2009: A reanalysis of the personal/impersonal distinction in moral psychology research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 57780.
  • Mendez M. F., Anderson E. and Shapira J. S. 2005: An investigation of moral judgement in frontotemporal dementia. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 18, 1937.
  • Moll J. and de Oliveira-Souza R., 2007: Moral judgments, emotions and the utilitarian brain. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 31921.
  • Moore, A. B., Clark, B. A. and Kane, M. J. 2008: Who shalt not kill? Individual differences in working memory capacity, executive control, and moral judgment. Psychological Science, 19, 54957.
    Direct Link:
  • Moretto G., Ladavas E., Mattioli F. and di Pellegrino G. 2009: A psychophysiological investigation of moral judgment after ventromedial prefrontal damage. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 188899.
  • Nichols, S. and Mallon, R. 2005: Moral dilemmas and moral rules. Cognition, 100, 53042.
  • Paxton J. M. and Greene J. D., 2010: Moral reasoning: hints and allegations. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 51127.
  • Paxton, J. M., Ungar, L. and Greene, J. D. 2012: Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 36, 16377.
  • Ross, W. D. 1930/2002: The Right and the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Schaich Borg, J., Hynes, C., Van Horn, J., Grafton, S. and Sinnott-Armstrong, W. 2006: Consequences, action, and intention as factors in moral judgments: an fMRI investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 80317.
  • Scheffler, S. 1994: The Rejection of Consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Shenhav, A. and Greene, J. D. 2010: Moral judgments recruit domain-general valuation mechanisms to integrate representations of probability and magnitude. Neuron, 76, 66777.
  • Singer, P. 2005: Ethics and intuitions. Journal of Ethics, 9, 33152.
  • Stanovich, K. 1999: Who is Rational? Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Stanovich, K. E. 2009: Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: is it time for a tri-process theory? In J. Evans and K. Frankish (eds), In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 5588.
  • Schwitzgebel, E. and Cushman, F. 2012: Expertise in moral reasoning? Order effects on moral judgment in professional philosophers and non-philosophers. Mind & Language, 27, 13553.
  • Tassy S., Oullier O., Duclos Y., Coulon O., Mancini J., Deruelle C., Attarian S., Felician O. and Wicker B. 2012: Disrupting the right prefrontal cortex alters moral judgement. Social, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 28288.
  • Thomson, J. J. 1985: The trolley problem. Yale Law Journal, 94, 13951415.
  • Williams, B. A. O. 1966: Consistency and realism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supp.), 40, 122.
  • Williams, B. A. O. 1973: A critique of utilitarianism. In J. J. C. Smart and B.A.O Williams (eds), Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zahn, R., Moll, J., Paiva, M., Garrido, G., Krueger, F., Huey, E. D. and Grafman, J. 2009a: The neural basis of human social values: evidence from functional MRI. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 27683.
  • Zahn, R., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Bramati, I., Garrido, G. and Moll, J. (2009b). Subgenual cingulate activity reflects individual differences in empathic concern. Neuroscience Letters, 457(2), 10710.