This work was supported by European Commission grant NEST-029088(ANALOGY), MRC grant G0300188, ESRC grant RES-062-23-2721, and a Leverhulme Study Abroad Fellowship to MT.
Is the Mystery of Thought Demystified by Context-Dependent Categorisation? Towards a New Relation Between Language and Thought†
Article first published online: 29 OCT 2012
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Mind & Language
Volume 27, Issue 5, pages 595–618, November 2012
How to Cite
Thomas, M. S. C., Purser, H. R. M. and Mareschal, D. (2012), Is the Mystery of Thought Demystified by Context-Dependent Categorisation? Towards a New Relation Between Language and Thought. Mind & Language, 27: 595–618. doi: 10.1111/mila.12004
- Issue published online: 29 OCT 2012
- Article first published online: 29 OCT 2012
We argue that are no such things as literal categories in human cognition. Instead, we argue that there are merely temporary coalescences of dimensions of similarity, which are brought together by context in order to create the similarity structure in mental representations appropriate for the task at hand. Fodor (2000) contends that context-sensitive cognition cannot be realised by current computational theories of mind. We address this challenge by describing a simple computational implementation that exhibits internal knowledge representations whose similarity structure alters fluidly depending on context. We explicate the processing properties that support this function and illustrate with two more complex models, one applied to the development of semantic knowledge (Rogers and McClelland, 2004), the second to the processing of simple metaphorical comparisons (Thomas and Mareschal, 2001). The models firstly demonstrate how phenomena that seem problematic for literal categorisation (such as the ‘non-literal’ comparisons involved in metaphor and analogy) resolve to particular cases of the contextual modulation of mental representations; and secondly prompt a new perspective on the relation between language and thought: language affords the strategic control of context on semantic knowledge, allowing information to be brought to bear in a given situation that might otherwise not be available to influence processing. This may explain one way in which human thought is creative, and distinctive from animal cognition.