Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interests.
Prospective Nonrandomized Trial
Modulation of Cold Pain Perception by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Healthy Individuals
Version of Record online: 14 DEC 2012
© 2012 International Neuromodulation Society
Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface
Volume 16, Issue 4, pages 345–348, July/August 2013
How to Cite
Zandieh, A., Parhizgar, S. E., Fakhri, M., Taghvaei, M., Miri, S., Shahbabaie, A., Esteghamati, S. and Ekhtiari, H. (2013), Modulation of Cold Pain Perception by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Healthy Individuals. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 16: 345–348. doi: 10.1111/ner.12009
For more information on author guidelines, an explanation of our peer review process, and conflict of interest informed consent policies, please go to http://www.wiley.com/bw/submit.asp?ref=1094-7159&site=1
- Issue online: 5 AUG 2013
- Version of Record online: 14 DEC 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 31 OCT 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 10 OCT 2012
- Manuscript Received: 11 JUN 2012
- Institute for Cognitive Science Studies (ICSS)
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS)
- Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS)
- Healthy subjects;
- primary motor cortex;
- transcranial direct current stimulation
The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cold pain perception in healthy individuals.
Anodal, cathodal (2 mA), or sham tDCSs were applied on the primary motor cortex of 22 healthy subjects in a random order. A cold pressor test was performed ten minutes after initiation of stimulation. Pain threshold and tolerance were defined as time latencies to the onset of pain perception and to the withdrawal from cold stimulus, respectively. Furthermore, pain intensity (on a scale from 0 to 10) was rated at tolerance.
Time latencies to pain threshold and tolerance were altered by the type of stimulation (p < 0.05). Pairwise post hoc analysis revealed that anodal tDCS led to increment in pain threshold and tolerance compared with sham stimulation (13.3 ± 7.4 vs. 10.9 ± 6.0 sec for the comparison of pain threshold and 54.6 ± 26.0 vs. 45.3 ± 17.9 for the comparison of pain tolerance following anodal and sham stimulations, respectively, p < 0.05 for both comparisons). However, cathodal stimulation did not alter pain perception in comparison to anodal and sham stimulations (p > 0.05). Furthermore, pain intensity score at tolerance was not significantly affected by the type of stimulation (p > 0.05).
Anodal stimulation of the primary motor area can be utilized to alleviate cold pain perception in healthy individuals.